Dear HR Departments:
Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako
Dear HR Departments:
Spamming AVCANADA with the same job postings won’t get you any more candidates for your positions than the mass carpet bombing inboxes increases prospects for applicants.
If your positions are going unfilled, they don’t pay enough.
End of story.
If your positions are going unfilled, they don’t pay enough.
End of story.
- schnitzel2k3
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1456
- Joined: Sun May 15, 2011 11:17 pm
- CL-Skadoo!
- Rank 8
- Posts: 819
- Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 6:41 pm
- Location: Intensity in Ten Cities.
-
- Rank 1
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2019 2:58 pm
Re: Dear HR Departments:
Bob is making some strong points here. We like Bob.
Re: Dear HR Departments:
Can we add: post the pay rate. If it says competitive compensation it isn’t. Why are you hiding it?
Re: Dear HR Departments:


Last edited by chapfo on Tue Jun 07, 2022 12:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- CL-Skadoo!
- Rank 8
- Posts: 819
- Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 6:41 pm
- Location: Intensity in Ten Cities.
Re: Dear HR Departments:
Our company has one of the best pay rates in the country and I am forbidden to share it. Go figure.
Re: Dear HR Departments:
Can you tell us where you work?CL-Skadoo! wrote: ↑Thu Mar 24, 2022 4:56 pmOur company has one of the best pay rates in the country and I am forbidden to share it. Go figure.

As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
-
- Rank 4
- Posts: 296
- Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2013 8:54 am
Re: Dear HR Departments:
‘Bob’ needs to work for my union. May it be a lesson for all operators who post ads on repeat: inflation alone is the reason to pay more; the pilots deserve it.
- PeterParker
- Rank 3
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2020 4:40 pm
Re: Dear HR Departments:
Probably an impossible ask but maybe we should get the admin to not allow posts without pay scales in the jobs forum? One can dream!
+1 to OP. It’s not a dearth of jobs. It is a dearth of jobs that pay a liveable wage.
+1 to OP. It’s not a dearth of jobs. It is a dearth of jobs that pay a liveable wage.
-
- Rank 0
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2017 3:41 pm
Re: Dear HR Departments:
One of the most recent ads doesn’t even include a way to apply
. No email or anything. Along with no location, no company name, no expected schedule, and no pay range. And doesn’t list the airplane types either. 

How can people even apply when there’s no application information provided? Not that I’m interested…
How can people even apply when there’s no application information provided? Not that I’m interested…
-
- Rank Moderator
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 3:47 pm
- Location: Straight outta Dundarave...
Re: Dear HR Departments:
But, but, but,....."Nobody wants to work anymore!"PeterParker wrote: ↑Thu Mar 24, 2022 10:18 pm Probably an impossible ask but maybe we should get the admin to not allow posts without pay scales in the jobs forum? One can dream!
+1 to OP. It’s not a dearth of jobs. It is a dearth of jobs that pay a liveable wage.
Say, what's that mountain goat doing up here in the mist?
Happiness is V1 at Thompson!
Ass, Licence, Job. In that order.
Happiness is V1 at Thompson!
Ass, Licence, Job. In that order.
- PeterParker
- Rank 3
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2020 4:40 pm
Re: Dear HR Departments:
Man, this forum needs a like button!North Shore wrote: ↑Wed Apr 27, 2022 7:21 pmBut, but, but,....."Nobody wants to work anymore!"PeterParker wrote: ↑Thu Mar 24, 2022 10:18 pm Probably an impossible ask but maybe we should get the admin to not allow posts without pay scales in the jobs forum? One can dream!
+1 to OP. It’s not a dearth of jobs. It is a dearth of jobs that pay a liveable wage.
Re: Dear HR Departments:
Let me understand this.
You want to see the pay scale so you can decide if you want to apply.
Demand AvCan to require it.
Is that what is referred to as entitlement?
Of course employers should post that. And none of the 200 hour wonders who think they should be starting at $100 k with 12 duty days a month will comment or criticize.
To be serious for a moment.
If you are qualified, and interested , apply. I am sure that working conditions and pay will be discussed.
I think the most important thing for an employer is to have a pay grid. The whole ‘we will pay you want we can negotiate’, is the fastest way for an employer to cause dissent.
Nothing likeLuke the Lazy making 50% more a month then harry hard worker.
Particularly small companies where the owners sometimes think that you are taking money right out their pockets….not putting it in.
In any event. No sane employer will listen to the demands of the entitled
You want to see the pay scale so you can decide if you want to apply.
Demand AvCan to require it.
Is that what is referred to as entitlement?
Of course employers should post that. And none of the 200 hour wonders who think they should be starting at $100 k with 12 duty days a month will comment or criticize.
To be serious for a moment.
If you are qualified, and interested , apply. I am sure that working conditions and pay will be discussed.
I think the most important thing for an employer is to have a pay grid. The whole ‘we will pay you want we can negotiate’, is the fastest way for an employer to cause dissent.
Nothing likeLuke the Lazy making 50% more a month then harry hard worker.
Particularly small companies where the owners sometimes think that you are taking money right out their pockets….not putting it in.
In any event. No sane employer will listen to the demands of the entitled
Accident speculation:
Those that post don’t know. Those that know don’t post
Those that post don’t know. Those that know don’t post
Re: Dear HR Departments:
Goes both ways in this market.
You expect me to leave my high paying job up north (because nobody else meets your experience requirements) but you don't even want to mention your salary range in the ad? You want me to take time out of my day and share all my personal info for a job that likely won't pay enough to interest me anyway?
Talk about entitlement
I honestly don't get why employers don't share a salary range. It would save both parties so much time.
You expect me to leave my high paying job up north (because nobody else meets your experience requirements) but you don't even want to mention your salary range in the ad? You want me to take time out of my day and share all my personal info for a job that likely won't pay enough to interest me anyway?
Talk about entitlement

I honestly don't get why employers don't share a salary range. It would save both parties so much time.
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
Re: Dear HR Departments:
It’s entirely correct and reasonable not to post the pay scale. No company wants their competitors to know what they pay, any more than they would advertise how much they pay to rent their hangar, their fuel contract price or any other commercially sensitive information.
Second reason: anyone who is encouraged to leave a job only because they see another has a higher salary is not the kind of employee any employer wants. Yes, every employer understands the desire to better one’s self, but if it’s true on the way in it’s true on the way out, too. So if what is not said in a job ad discourages the wrong sort of candidate from applying - it’s a good ad.
If you want to work somewhere, apply, and discuss salary terms.
Second reason: anyone who is encouraged to leave a job only because they see another has a higher salary is not the kind of employee any employer wants. Yes, every employer understands the desire to better one’s self, but if it’s true on the way in it’s true on the way out, too. So if what is not said in a job ad discourages the wrong sort of candidate from applying - it’s a good ad.
If you want to work somewhere, apply, and discuss salary terms.
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
-
- Rank 3
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:46 pm
-
- Rank 3
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 5:46 pm
Re: Dear HR Departments:
normal industries / job ads DO share a salary range !
digits_ wrote: ↑Wed Apr 27, 2022 9:39 pm Goes both ways in this market.
You expect me to leave my high paying job up north (because nobody else meets your experience requirements) but you don't even want to mention your salary range in the ad? You want me to take time out of my day and share all my personal info for a job that likely won't pay enough to interest me anyway?
Talk about entitlement
I honestly don't get why employers don't share a salary range. It would save both parties so much time.
Re: Dear HR Departments:
The irony is that companies likely know very well what other companies are paying.photofly wrote: ↑Thu Apr 28, 2022 4:21 am It’s entirely correct and reasonable not to post the pay scale. No company wants their competitors to know what they pay, any more than they would advertise how much they pay to rent their hangar, their fuel contract price or any other commercially sensitive information.
Pilots usually also think they know what a company pays, based on information on avcanada. But that info is likely years old, and might be completely wrong. But it might still deter people from applying.
A good example of that were the Missinippi ads. If anyone would have asked me if they were a good company to work for, then I would have told them the pay wasn't the greatest, based on my info that was a few years old. Now they posted a job ad with a 100k - 130k salary, which puts them at the top in their region. If anyone now asks about Missinippi, the answer will be 'they seemed to have really improved their salary, might be worth to check it out'. It's likely other pilots have the same experiences.
How would delaying your salary reveal attract or discourage people who are only in it for the money? All you are doing is hiding a piece of information necessary to make a decision. I find it unlikely it would significantly affect a decision to work anywhere.photofly wrote: ↑Thu Apr 28, 2022 4:21 am Second reason: anyone who is encouraged to leave a job only because they see another has a higher salary is not the kind of employee any employer wants. Yes, every employer understands the desire to better one’s self, but if it’s true on the way in it’s true on the way out, too. So if what is not said in a job ad discourages the wrong sort of candidate from applying - it’s a good ad.
The market is changing again. Might as well say 'if you want me to work at your company, tell me what the salary is so we don't waste each other's time'.
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
Re: Dear HR Departments:
How? It's one thing to have a rough idea, another to see it officially published online.
The entirety of your answer makes sense only from the perspective of someone who cares the most about money. I realize that describes most pilots, but it's still true.Pilots usually also think they know what a company pays, based on information on avcanada. But that info is likely years old, and might be completely wrong. But it might still deter people from applying
A good example of that were the Missinippi ads. If anyone would have asked me if they were a good company to work for, then I would have told them the pay wasn't the greatest, based on my info that was a few years old. Now they posted a job ad with a 100k - 130k salary, which puts them at the top in their region. If anyone now asks about Missinippi, the answer will be 'they seemed to have really improved their salary, might be worth to check it out'. It's likely other pilots have the same experiences.
..
Here it is, broken down:
But they didn't ask about the pay - they asked if they were a good company to work for, which you associate with pay.If anyone would have asked me if they were a good company to work for, then I would have told them the pay wasn't the greatest,
Which is the obvious answer by and for anyone for whom money is the most important thing.If anyone now asks about Missinippi, the answer will be 'they seemed to have really improved their salary
True, if salary is the first thing you use to decide whether you want a job or not. But it could be schedule, or location, or something else.Might as well say 'if you want me to work at your company, tell me what the salary is so we don't waste each other's time'.
Think about someone who cares about shiny metal. Their approach might be "I asked them if they were a good company to work for but .. no, they have old airplanes - or, yes, they have a great fleet.. Then, they might say tell me up front what airplanes you fly we don't waste each other's time.
And you think companies are bad, for their mercenary attitudes.The market is changing again. Might as well say 'if you want me to work at your company, tell me what the salary is so we don't waste each other's time'.
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
Re: Dear HR Departments:
Good point. It would be mainly rumours from ex employees or applicants. Althought in a way one could say that the widespread rumours have more effect on a company's salary and hiring than what the actual salary is.
True, but that information is factually available on the TC registry, and likely on the company's website. And often present in the job ad. Even if it is not advertised, you can find it. You don't need rumours for that.photofly wrote: ↑Thu Apr 28, 2022 8:39 am
Think about someone who cares about shiny metal. Their approach might be "I asked them if they were a good company to work for but .. no, they have old airplanes - or, yes, they have a great fleet.. Then, they might say tell me up front what airplanes you fly we don't waste each other's time.
Not really. There are flying jobs I would, realistically, never ever do again, not even if they paid double or tripple. Other people might if the money's good.The entirety of your answer makes sense only from the perspective of someone who cares the most about money. I realize that describes most pilots, but it's still true.
This turns it into a philosophical discussion a bit, but most people go to work every day to make money. I think we can agree salary is an important factor of any job. It's also the one factor that is missing from most job ads. Other factors such as airplane type are often mentioned. Bases and schedule are also frequently mentioned. Salary rarely is.
In my mind -which is a twisted place- I find many smilarities with companies advertising products without a price. If it's not advertised, it's likely overpriced.
If a job ad doesn't mention the pay, it's likely too low.
I don't think they are bad, I think they are being inefficient and I don't understand what they hope to accomplish by hiding the salary.
It gives the impression -to me- that they are very insecure about the salary they are offering.
Generally, if you want something that is hard to find (such as experienced float drivers or medevac pilots), you want to make your job ad as attractive as possible to attract as many candidates as possible. A salary posting would help a lot in that regards IMO.
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
Re: Dear HR Departments:
Almost all companies advertise products without a price. The ones that headline prices are competing on price, and looking for a particular class of customer. The ones that don't are competing on something else, and looking for a different class of customer.
Overpriced is simply a value judgement in the eye of the individual purchaser. I'm happy to pay a premium for lots of functionally equivalent products that are differentiated by factors important to me, but unimportant to others. Same with jobs.
Companies advertising their salaries in job ads are selecting against one class of candidate. They are excluding the entire class of candidates who say "if you don't tell me up front how much, I won't bother to apply", and that can be a deliberate and beneficial exclusion. The company may be such that if you're the sort of pilot who's first question about a job is "how much" - we don't want you to apply.
Advertising a service (or a job) is as much about discouraging contact from unsuitable customers (and candidates) as attracting the right ones. If you find yourself complaining that a job ad doesn't attract you - that might be a deliberate thing, from the employer's perspective. The ad might be perfect, and you might be the problem.
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.