You clearly haven't been here long enough to fully investigate and understand the complete capitulatory, colluding "$hitshow" that is ACPA. Tell us all just exactly how long you have been paying attention as an employee. Over two decades I've earned my right to an opinion and don't need to be "corrected" by you.Protonpilot wrote: ↑Mon Jan 16, 2023 12:04 pmSome of us are worried that you're also willing to "set alight" our $50M, handing it over to ALPA Washington without due diligence, as long as we throw ACPA in the dumpster as soon as possible.RippleRock wrote: ↑Mon Jan 16, 2023 8:14 am Some of us are very eager to see the yellow, colluding, capitulating mess that is ACPA thrown hard into a dumpster and set alight.
Can't happen quickly enough in my world. Any "initiative" otherwise seems a waste of resources and time.
There's a process that needs to be followed here. It's not a waste of resources and time.
First and foremost, this is a negotiation with ALPA, about what we pay, what representation we get, what resources we get, and what happens to a very big sum of funds that have been accumulated over decades. Think 'prenup' when one party is entering into a marriage with a lot of assets.
You're breaking rule number 1 of negotiations. Announcing that you're willing to sign a merger deal no matter what.
I've been watching WACON get decimated and pieced out for 22 years. We could not possibly do worse. Every time we go into negots, we take in a horse to trade, and come back with a damn donkey. No snap-backs. All losses permanent. The term "snap-back" doesn't even exist in the ACPA volcabulary.
Yes, I am willing to do a "sight unseen" signing. Show me where. The faster ACPA is incinerated the better.