When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Discuss topics relating to Air Canada.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

Loon-A-Tic
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 367
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2020 12:51 pm

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by Loon-A-Tic »

In my opinion and it’s just that “work to rule” gets more attention from all than a strike. The travel public understand what a strike means, no flying. How ever they soon become cranky with travelling to the airport only to discover their flight was cancelled at the last minute due to a “known” wok to rule clause.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Protonpilot
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 34
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2022 10:06 am

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by Protonpilot »

Fanblade wrote: Sat Oct 29, 2022 9:38 am
The SC ruling trumps anything from a lower court. Federal, Provincial. It doesn’t matter.

You'd think that... until a provincial government legislates a union back to work and invokes the notwithstanding clause. Ontario did it today with education workers after CUPE gave strike notice. Section 33 of the constitution gives a provincial or federal government a five year get out of jail free card.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ ... -1.6634686

What's more worrying is the peanuts offer from the province that goes along with that legislation:

"CUPE is looking for annual salary increases of 11.7% and the government in response has offered raises of two per cent a year for workers making less than $40,000 and 1.25 per cent for all others."
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by Protonpilot on Mon Oct 31, 2022 2:16 pm, edited 2 times in total.
DanWEC
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2321
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 1:05 pm
Location: 404

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by DanWEC »

This is exactly what I'm talking about.
---------- ADS -----------
 
kiaszceski
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 369
Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2019 10:29 am

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by kiaszceski »

Shhh this is democracy. Do not let people strike, ever.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Fanblade
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1701
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:50 pm

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by Fanblade »

Protonpilot wrote: Mon Oct 31, 2022 6:49 am
Fanblade wrote: Sat Oct 29, 2022 9:38 am
The SC ruling trumps anything from a lower court. Federal, Provincial. It doesn’t matter.

You'd think that... until a provincial government legislates a union back to work and invokes the notwithstanding clause. Ontario did it today with education workers after CUPE gave strike notice. Section 33 of the constitution gives a provincial or federal government a five year get out of jail free card.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ ... -1.6634686

What's more worrying is the peanuts offer from the province that goes along with that legislation:

"CUPE is looking for annual salary increases of 11.7% and the government in response has offered raises of two per cent a year for workers making less than $40,000 and 1.25 per cent for all others."
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ ... -1.6635275

Ontario education workers will walk off the job Friday despite anti-strike legislation, CUPE says


Ontario Teachers have taken the all out work stoppage (strike) and this was the governments response.

The point of my comments were you don’t have to go the full blown strike route.

But the wage increases Ford is offering are insulting. They amount to pay cuts. Legislated pay cuts.
---------- ADS -----------
 
fish4life
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2411
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 6:32 am

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by fish4life »

Also provincial governments don’t have any legislation they can inact or oversight over airlines since they are federally regulated
---------- ADS -----------
 
Cavalier44
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 205
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 6:32 am

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by Cavalier44 »

CUPE is advising its members to walk off the job Friday regardless of Ontario's proposed anti-strike legislation, which came into effect on Monday and invokes the notwithstanding clause to block job action by the union.

I wonder if ACPA, or even ALPA, would have the courage to advise its members to do the same if we found ourselves confronted with the same situation in 2024. A strike action may be the only way in which the pilot group is able to exercise its leverage over the company in order to force them to come to the bargaining table, or else risk losing profit via major flight disruptions/cancellations.

Any legislation that inhibits our ability to conduct a strike action effectively cripples our ability to collectively bargain for improved working conditions, and therefore must be disregarded even if such an action were to be deemed illegal. I'd like to see our representation publicly commit to the possibility of strike action regardless of any existing back-to-work legislation that may be in place prior to contract negotiations in 2024.
---------- ADS -----------
 
alkaseltzer
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 313
Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2018 6:16 pm

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by alkaseltzer »

https://m.dailykos.com/stories/2022/10/ ... g-in-court


Anyone know how high the bar was set by Delta’s ALPA? Sounds like it was her own resources, not the union.

Anyone have the deets?

Anyone? Anyone? Bueller?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Alkasultzer
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2022 5:09 pm

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by Alkasultzer »

All I know is Delta pilots are definitely envious of acpa and all of its accomplishments

I mean, look at that contract & pay. Simply world class
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
schnitzel2k3
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1456
Joined: Sun May 15, 2011 11:17 pm

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by schnitzel2k3 »

Cavalier44 wrote: Tue Nov 01, 2022 9:54 am CUPE is advising its members to walk off the job Friday regardless of Ontario's proposed anti-strike legislation, which came into effect on Monday and invokes the notwithstanding clause to block job action by the union.

I wonder if ACPA, or even ALPA, would have the courage to advise its members to do the same if we found ourselves confronted with the same situation in 2024. A strike action may be the only way in which the pilot group is able to exercise its leverage over the company in order to force them to come to the bargaining table, or else risk losing profit via major flight disruptions/cancellations.

Any legislation that inhibits our ability to conduct a strike action effectively cripples our ability to collectively bargain for improved working conditions, and therefore must be disregarded even if such an action were to be deemed illegal. I'd like to see our representation publicly commit to the possibility of strike action regardless of any existing back-to-work legislation that may be in place prior to contract negotiations in 2024.
It sounds like the better option is work-to-rule with rotating picket lines, eliminating the operational flexibility that management relies upon. This would cause major headaches, but no official shutdown, so the government can't take action.

Both the federal and provincial governments at different times have shown their hands regarding their stances on job action and 2024 is too important for the industry to get shutout again.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
disco
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 172
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 11:38 am
Location: On a need-to-know basis

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by disco »

[/quote]


The Protecting Air Service Act is a Federal statute, currently in force.
https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/ann ... lText.html


[/quote]

This is incorrect. The Protecting Air Service Act is not currently in force. The Act is "spent".
---------- ADS -----------
 
Protonpilot
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 34
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2022 10:06 am

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by Protonpilot »

disco wrote: Thu Nov 03, 2022 12:24 am

This is incorrect. The Protecting Air Service Act is not currently in force. The Act is "spent".
It is most definitely spent.

The feds would have to enact a new law. The Liberals don't have a majority so would require the support of at least one other party, especially for something that would require invoking the notwithstanding clause. Hard to see that happening, but you never know. People get annoyed pretty fast when their summer vacation is threatened.

If such a bill were to pass, it would be called something else, "Protecting the Supply Chain Act", "Protecting the Economy Act" etc.
---------- ADS -----------
 
altiplano
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5382
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 2:24 pm

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by altiplano »

Trudeau is on record this week saying he supports collective bargaining and circumventing it with legislation and the notwithstanding clause is inappropriate.

Of course he's playing politics with the Ford government pushing CUPE to keep the schools open, but I doubt even Trudeau is hypocritical enough to flip flop here, particularly with NDP propping his gov up.

PASA is dead and in the past, AC pilots absolutely have the right to and should use job action pressure when the time is appropriate.
---------- ADS -----------
 
JHR
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 362
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2021 11:21 am

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by JHR »

Start now...no more overtime. Don't answer the phone on days off. No more favours!
---------- ADS -----------
 
TheAlcalde
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 51
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2021 4:09 am

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by TheAlcalde »

JHR wrote: Thu Nov 03, 2022 3:26 pm Start now...no more overtime. Don't answer the phone on days off. No more favours!
Too many boats and ex-wives
---------- ADS -----------
 
cdnavater
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1351
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2021 11:25 am

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by cdnavater »

FelixGustof wrote: Fri Oct 28, 2022 7:48 pm
cdnavater wrote: Fri Oct 28, 2022 7:04 pm
FelixGustof wrote: Fri Oct 28, 2022 6:26 pm

Lol...

Even my 18 yrs old ass knows that

You have a CONSTITUTIONAL right to strike

https://ehlaw.ca/supreme-court-constitu ... to-strike/

Gezus AC pilots are really a beaten down lot!
You were 7 or 8 so I’ll forgive your ignorance,

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/air-ca ... -1.1268054

“The back-to-work bill to send a pair of Air Canada labour disputes to binding arbitration passed the Senate on Thursday and was quickly given royal assent.

The legislation covers about 8,600 mechanics, baggage handlers and other ground crew at Air Canada and about 3,000 pilots.

Labour Minister Lisa Raitt had proposed the back-to-work legislation on Monday, saying a work stoppage at the airline would hurt the economy.”
Good thing is that in school these days they teach you about the importance of "dates"

Quoting crap from 2012 gets trumped by stuff written after and offers a new precedent moving forward

The Supreme Court ruled in 2015 that it is our CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT

Stay in school kids!

https://ropergreyell.com/resource/const ... ht-strike/

For years, governments have struggled to allow the voluntary resolution of collective bargaining disputes while at the same time protecting the public interest.

That challenge has become more complex now that the Supreme Court of Canada reversed a decades old precedent and concluded that the right to strike is protected as part of the fundamental freedom of association under section 2(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This is one of the latest developments in the Court’s application of section 2(d) to the right to participate in a process of meaningful collective bargaining.
It seems the Ontario Conservatives don’t give a flying fart about the supreme courts ruling, governments will do what they think is in the best interest of Canadians and face the courts later. Which by the way, the damage will already be done by the time it works it’s way through the system.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
schnitzel2k3
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1456
Joined: Sun May 15, 2011 11:17 pm

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by schnitzel2k3 »

TheAlcalde wrote: Thu Nov 03, 2022 7:59 pm
JHR wrote: Thu Nov 03, 2022 3:26 pm Start now...no more overtime. Don't answer the phone on days off. No more favours!
Too many boats and ex-wives
What's the saying, anything that floats, flies or f&cks, rent it?
---------- ADS -----------
 
firstofficer
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed May 09, 2018 2:22 pm

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by firstofficer »

Now GO transit workers are set to go on strike on Monday…..I believe it’s long overdue the union grow a pair and stand their ground by demanding better wages regardless of whatever criminal laws prevent such demonstrations or even strikes. Enough is enough. If we, as a collective can organize a day to walk out on the job. They’ll have no option but to listen and negotiate. The Canadian aviation industry generated a revenue of $4.1 billion in the first quarter, 166.8% increase. If the union still can’t cater to their members I think it’s probably best for a new union to take shape because this is simply absurd
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Bede
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4433
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:52 am

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by Bede »

firstofficer wrote: Sat Nov 05, 2022 2:55 pm Enough is enough. If we, as a collective can organize a day to walk out on the job. They’ll have no option but to listen and negotiate.
I’m always blown away with comments like this. We are dealing with people who’s life’s work is to make contingency plans. You will almost never find yourself in a situation where the other party has “no option” but to give you what you want. I’ve seen this line of thinking numerous times and watched as an employer executed plan B and someone besides the pilots reaped the rewards. This lack of long term strategic thinking is exactly why we find ourselves in the position that we’re in.
---------- ADS -----------
 
negroni
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 83
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2022 12:16 pm

Re: When ALPA says 'Where should we set our bar?'

Post by negroni »

Sorry, where exactly will the airlines find 5000+ atpl pilots overnight? And have them trained and ready to fly?

Your line of thinking is fearful and defeatist. I'm not at all saying we should all just walk off the job. But when the time comes for labor action this group of pilots in this country need to realize the immense power we hold.

We are where we are because of inept union leaders and a government that enforced illegal FOS. If we had balls back then and had taken the government to court (and not signed a new contract just a few years later essentially cementing all the FOS losses) we'd have won and be better off. But that would have taken smarts and unity, and a real union.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “Air Canada”