Oopsies...maybe that YKF-YVR red-eye isn't the best idea

Discuss topics related to Flair Airlines.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

thepoors
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 187
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2022 8:27 am

Oopsies...maybe that YKF-YVR red-eye isn't the best idea

Post by thepoors »

---------- ADS -----------
 
averageatbest
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 306
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2022 10:13 am

Re: Oopsies...maybe that YKF-YVR red-eye isn't the best idea

Post by averageatbest »

Why? If you are properly rested, red-eyes are perfectly easy and legal.
---------- ADS -----------
 
ZBBYLW
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 571
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 11:28 am

Re: Oopsies...maybe that YKF-YVR red-eye isn't the best idea

Post by ZBBYLW »

Perfect easy? Not a chance. At best with proper rest (6+hour nap) they are tolerable.

Now consider instead of resting prior to their YVR-YKF they were operating a YKF-YVR leg leaving around dinner time in YKF it shows the new F&D rules don't help out enough.

I'd say the vast majority of pilots doing a dinner time YKF-YVR-YKF would be absolutely shattered on arrival 12 hours later. JMO.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
BTD
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1506
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 8:53 pm

Re: Oopsies...maybe that YKF-YVR red-eye isn't the best idea

Post by BTD »

ZBBYLW wrote: Sat Nov 26, 2022 7:00 am Perfect easy? Not a chance. At best with proper rest (6+hour nap) they are tolerable.

Now consider instead of resting prior to their YVR-YKF they were operating a YKF-YVR leg leaving around dinner time in YKF it shows the new F&D rules don't help out enough.

I'd say the vast majority of pilots doing a dinner time YKF-YVR-YKF would be absolutely shattered on arrival 12 hours later. JMO.
Tolerable is a good way to describe it. I’m a bit of a night owl, so I can tolerate the flight. But the drive home after is brutal. I’ve pulled over for a 10 min nap more than once.
---------- ADS -----------
 
rudder
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3857
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 12:10 pm

Re: Oopsies...maybe that YKF-YVR red-eye isn't the best idea

Post by rudder »

averageatbest wrote: Sat Nov 26, 2022 6:43 am
Why? If you are properly rested, red-eyes are perfectly easy and legal.
A red eye is 1 sector, not a round trip of 4114 nm.
---------- ADS -----------
 
ogopogo
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 301
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 7:28 am

Re: Oopsies...maybe that YKF-YVR red-eye isn't the best idea

Post by ogopogo »

Aren’t west coast turns done all the time?
OK, maybe the return leg was a redeye, but so what?....assuming you were well rested because you knew the sked ahead of time.
Why is this even a discussion?
---------- ADS -----------
 
AirportCoffee
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2019 12:40 pm

Re: Oopsies...maybe that YKF-YVR red-eye isn't the best idea

Post by AirportCoffee »

OK, maybe the return leg was a redeye, but so what?....assuming you were well rested because you knew the sked ahead of time.
Why is this even a discussion?
Exactly this. Airlines and cargo operators have been doing this for decades and continue to do so safely.
---------- ADS -----------
 
altiplano
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5382
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 2:24 pm

Re: Oopsies...maybe that YKF-YVR red-eye isn't the best idea

Post by altiplano »

ogopogo wrote: Sat Nov 26, 2022 7:04 pm Aren’t west coast turns done all the time?
OK, maybe the return leg was a redeye, but so what?....assuming you were well rested because you knew the sked ahead of time.
Why is this even a discussion?
"but so what"

A transcon turn is a long day and tiring at the best of times.

A single transcon red-eye leg is difficult and fatiguing at the best of times.

Were these guys well rested? Were they acclimatized to WOCL flying? What was their roster?

Scheduling transcon red-eye turns is a recipe for trouble.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Crewbunk
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 205
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2020 8:46 am

Re: Oopsies...maybe that YKF-YVR red-eye isn't the best idea

Post by Crewbunk »

AirportCoffee wrote: Sat Nov 26, 2022 8:46 pm
OK, maybe the return leg was a redeye, but so what?....assuming you were well rested because you knew the sked ahead of time.
Why is this even a discussion?
Exactly this. Airlines and cargo operators have been doing this for decades and continue to do so safely.
Air Canada does not do red-eye turns. Any west coast to eastern Canada red-eye must begin and end with a layover. (Or start or end of duty).
---------- ADS -----------
 
ZBBYLW
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 571
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 11:28 am

Re: Oopsies...maybe that YKF-YVR red-eye isn't the best idea

Post by ZBBYLW »

Crewbunk wrote: Sun Nov 27, 2022 7:34 am
AirportCoffee wrote: Sat Nov 26, 2022 8:46 pm
OK, maybe the return leg was a redeye, but so what?....assuming you were well rested because you knew the sked ahead of time.
Why is this even a discussion?
Exactly this. Airlines and cargo operators have been doing this for decades and continue to do so safely.
Air Canada does not do red-eye turns. Any west coast to eastern Canada red-eye must begin and end with a layover. (Or start or end of duty).
On occasion AC will have a WB do a red eye turn and depending on the length of the pairing will have 3 or 4 pilots and a bunk.

When Rouge started up they had planned on doing red eye turns to for example LAS and then ACPA and AC sat down and decided it would be unsafe to do so. 10+ years ago also did red eye turns to YYC/YEG/YMM but over time stopped doing them (scheduled anyhow not sure about reserve) while legal they weren't safe enough.
---------- ADS -----------
 
bcflyer
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1305
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:35 am
Location: Canada

Re: Oopsies...maybe that YKF-YVR red-eye isn't the best idea

Post by bcflyer »

ogopogo wrote: Sat Nov 26, 2022 7:04 pm Aren’t west coast turns done all the time?
OK, maybe the return leg was a redeye, but so what?....assuming you were well rested because you knew the sked ahead of time.
Why is this even a discussion?
This way of thinking is one of the reasons Canada is so far behind the rest of the world in duty regs. Unless your entire schedule consists of strictly 12hr all nighters, your body will not adjust and you will be fatigued. You may think you are on your game but your reaction times and decision making process are not.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Crewbunk
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 205
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2020 8:46 am

Re: Oopsies...maybe that YKF-YVR red-eye isn't the best idea

Post by Crewbunk »

ZBBYLW wrote: Sun Nov 27, 2022 8:31 am
Crewbunk wrote: Sun Nov 27, 2022 7:34 am
AirportCoffee wrote: Sat Nov 26, 2022 8:46 pm

Exactly this. Airlines and cargo operators have been doing this for decades and continue to do so safely.
Air Canada does not do red-eye turns. Any west coast to eastern Canada red-eye must begin and end with a layover. (Or start or end of duty).
On occasion AC will have a WB do a red eye turn and depending on the length of the pairing will have 3 or 4 pilots and a bunk.

When Rouge started up they had planned on doing red eye turns to for example LAS and then ACPA and AC sat down and decided it would be unsafe to do so. 10+ years ago also did red eye turns to YYC/YEG/YMM but over time stopped doing them (scheduled anyhow not sure about reserve) while legal they weren't safe enough.
Yes. Air Canada has a very active Fatigue Management Committee. It is staffed by both sides of the fence, ACPA/Air Canada. When an onerous leg arises, (through multiple fatigue reports), both sides try to find a way to do it safely.

In my last 30+ years at Air Canada, I’ve seen just about every permutation and combination of ways to do it. I’ve seen DH’s in and out, three pilot ops in a NB, (with a J seat blocked), etc. all that culminated with the present scheduling rule …. off duty at either end of the red-eye.

If today, a red-eye turn is flown, it’s an IRROP. The pilots have the option of not flying if they feel fatigue is an issue.

As you know, Rouge, IS Air Canada. Fatigue Management is done by ACPA/AC. As you correctly state, unless an IRROP, a red-eye turn is not flown. And honestly, most IRROPS are just cancelled, or planned delayed at the turn point for crew rest.

Yes, this is an expensive way to operate. Safety is expensive. I feel for this Flair crew. Landing onto a short contaminated runway after 12 hours duty overnight can’t have been easy. Let’s face it, if their last landing had been a CAT III at YYZ, they would have watched Boeing’s finest land for them.
---------- ADS -----------
 
averageatbest
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 306
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2022 10:13 am

Re: Oopsies...maybe that YKF-YVR red-eye isn't the best idea

Post by averageatbest »

bcflyer wrote: Sun Nov 27, 2022 8:35 am
This way of thinking is one of the reasons Canada is so far behind the rest of the world in duty regs. Unless your entire schedule consists of strictly 12hr all nighters, your body will not adjust and you will be fatigued. You may think you are on your game but your reaction times and decision making process are not.
Let's implement a 1500 hour minimum requirement for all airline pilots. That'll solve the problem.
---------- ADS -----------
 
8895
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 102
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2018 8:32 am

Re: Oopsies...maybe that YKF-YVR red-eye isn't the best idea

Post by 8895 »

averageatbest wrote: Sun Nov 27, 2022 9:52 am
bcflyer wrote: Sun Nov 27, 2022 8:35 am
This way of thinking is one of the reasons Canada is so far behind the rest of the world in duty regs. Unless your entire schedule consists of strictly 12hr all nighters, your body will not adjust and you will be fatigued. You may think you are on your game but your reaction times and decision making process are not.
Let's implement a 1500 hour minimum requirement for all airline pilots. That'll solve the problem.
If that was sarcasm (which I hope it is) that was poorly executed lol
---------- ADS -----------
 
2112
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 151
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2017 2:33 pm

Re: Oopsies...maybe that YKF-YVR red-eye isn't the best idea

Post by 2112 »

8895 wrote: Sun Nov 27, 2022 10:53 am
averageatbest wrote: Sun Nov 27, 2022 9:52 am
bcflyer wrote: Sun Nov 27, 2022 8:35 am
This way of thinking is one of the reasons Canada is so far behind the rest of the world in duty regs. Unless your entire schedule consists of strictly 12hr all nighters, your body will not adjust and you will be fatigued. You may think you are on your game but your reaction times and decision making process are not.
Let's implement a 1500 hour minimum requirement for all airline pilots. That'll solve the problem.
If that was sarcasm (which I hope it is) that was poorly executed lol
Would definitely solve the pay problem, much to the ire of our flight-school grads but yeah safety is TC's utmost third priority with regards to fatigue.
---------- ADS -----------
 
averageatbest
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 306
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2022 10:13 am

Re: Oopsies...maybe that YKF-YVR red-eye isn't the best idea

Post by averageatbest »

8895 wrote: Sun Nov 27, 2022 10:53 am
averageatbest wrote: Sun Nov 27, 2022 9:52 am
bcflyer wrote: Sun Nov 27, 2022 8:35 am
This way of thinking is one of the reasons Canada is so far behind the rest of the world in duty regs. Unless your entire schedule consists of strictly 12hr all nighters, your body will not adjust and you will be fatigued. You may think you are on your game but your reaction times and decision making process are not.
Let's implement a 1500 hour minimum requirement for all airline pilots. That'll solve the problem.
If that was sarcasm (which I hope it is) that was poorly executed lol
Colgan 3407
---------- ADS -----------
 
Curiousflyer
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 159
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 7:13 pm

Re: Oopsies...maybe that YKF-YVR red-eye isn't the best idea

Post by Curiousflyer »

averageatbest wrote: Sun Nov 27, 2022 7:53 pm
8895 wrote: Sun Nov 27, 2022 10:53 am
averageatbest wrote: Sun Nov 27, 2022 9:52 am

Let's implement a 1500 hour minimum requirement for all airline pilots. That'll solve the problem.
If that was sarcasm (which I hope it is) that was poorly executed lol
Colgan 3407
Coltan resulted in better training, better rest, and better experience. 1500 hours was part of many new regulations that resulted in a safer industry, arguably its worked given the last 10 years of safety in the US. Meanwhile, we have less training, less rest, and less experience.
---------- ADS -----------
 
averageatbest
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 306
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2022 10:13 am

Re: Oopsies...maybe that YKF-YVR red-eye isn't the best idea

Post by averageatbest »

Curiousflyer wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 8:31 pm
averageatbest wrote: Sun Nov 27, 2022 7:53 pm
8895 wrote: Sun Nov 27, 2022 10:53 am

If that was sarcasm (which I hope it is) that was poorly executed lol
Colgan 3407
Coltan resulted in better training, better rest, and better experience. 1500 hours was part of many new regulations that resulted in a safer industry, arguably its worked given the last 10 years of safety in the US. Meanwhile, we have less training, less rest, and less experience.
"Arguably it's worked" is another way to say that you feel like it's worked but don't have proof.

I repeat, the 1500 hour rule would not have prevented the Colgan Air crash as both pilots had a lot more than that amount anyway. The crash had nothing to do with experience.
---------- ADS -----------
 
PostmasterGeneral
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 844
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 3:50 pm

Re: Oopsies...maybe that YKF-YVR red-eye isn't the best idea

Post by PostmasterGeneral »

averageatbest wrote: Wed Nov 30, 2022 2:13 am
Curiousflyer wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 8:31 pm
averageatbest wrote: Sun Nov 27, 2022 7:53 pm

Colgan 3407
Coltan resulted in better training, better rest, and better experience. 1500 hours was part of many new regulations that resulted in a safer industry, arguably its worked given the last 10 years of safety in the US. Meanwhile, we have less training, less rest, and less experience.
"Arguably it's worked" is another way to say that you feel like it's worked but don't have proof.

I repeat, the 1500 hour rule would not have prevented the Colgan Air crash as both pilots had a lot more than that amount anyway. The crash had nothing to do with experience.
Whether it applied to the Colgan crew or not, we need a 1500h rule here in canada as well. It’s done nothing but good in the USA.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Selcal
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2022 6:11 pm

Re: Oopsies...maybe that YKF-YVR red-eye isn't the best idea

Post by Selcal »

Does anyone know what the scheduled Flight Duty Period is for this pairing? Also, what is the max FDP?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “Flair Airlines”