I'm very well aware this is a summation of the whole contract. But we both know any sort of improvement that happened would be part of this presentation. I've gone through an ALPA presentation after a new contract before, and said presentation essentially has all the new positive aspects of the TA. Anything not mentioned is either because it is status quo, or a concession they're hoping you don't notice.Arnie Pye wrote: ↑Thu Dec 08, 2022 12:46 pmCompare Canada to Australia then. Roughly the same landmass. 10M smaller population base. I think you'll find their salaries well above Canadian wages.
No one has seen it. What you have seen is 15 powerpoint slides that attempt to summarize a 50 page document.Bacunayagua wrote: ↑Thu Dec 08, 2022 10:01 amGRK2 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 08, 2022 9:50 am Jeezuz you guys are exhausting. Have any of you actually seen the TA you so disparage so much? I don't think you have. In fact I KNOW you haven't. If you do indeed work for Flair why are you still there if it's so shitty? Settle down and wait for the details or you'll risk looking even more divisive than you are already. Forming an opinion without all the facts is simply idiotic.
I personally have seen it, and it sucks ass. But I do not work for Flair.
A little rough math: Everyone can do 10% more flying. Therefore, 10% less pilots required.crashpadcommute wrote: ↑Thu Dec 08, 2022 1:42 am With the increase of MMG to 85 hrs, how many positions are eliminated?
And how many captain spots are subsequently reduced?
What effect does that have on progression?
If the original plan was for 700 pilots, then that's 70 less pilots and probably 40 less Captains required.
If there are so many other positive aspects to the new contract as GRK2 claims, and maybe yourself? Then we both know they would have also been included in this presentation.
But I'm happy to be proven wrong. Please show us what other notable improvements were left out of this presentation.