Is AC considered a Legacy Airline anymore?

Discuss topics relating to Air Canada.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

ameliapilote
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2023 2:58 pm

Is AC considered a Legacy Airline anymore?

Post by ameliapilote »

Given the pay in comparison to North American legacy carriers, is AC even considered a legacy airline anymore?

The pilots look and dress like Delta, American and United but the new hire pay is less than Canadian regionals or Ultra Low Cost Carriers

AC Widebody pilots are the lowest paid on the globe

US ULCCs flying 320s pay more than mighty 777 Captains

This doesn't even include the 3rd world working conditions

Is there a better term to describe AC now?


Low Cost Legacy: All the perks without the pay

Bush League Legacy: You get the hat of a legacy carrier with a contract that rivals the bush
---------- ADS -----------
 
Tbayer2021
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 485
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2021 7:18 am

Re: Is AC considered a Legacy Airline anymore?

Post by Tbayer2021 »

Lol someone's trying to ruffle up some feathers. You don't even have to compare to American ULCCs. Some Q400 operators in the US are paying more than 777 captain at AC.

In terms of name, you'll be happy to hear that AC pilots are referred to as "The pirates of the North Atlantic", by our American brethren.
---------- ADS -----------
 
CaptDukeNukem
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1146
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2022 9:33 am

Re: Is AC considered a Legacy Airline anymore?

Post by CaptDukeNukem »

ameliapilote wrote: Wed Apr 05, 2023 5:55 am Given the pay in comparison to North American legacy carriers, is AC even considered a legacy airline anymore?

The pilots look and dress like Delta, American and United but the new hire pay is less than Canadian regionals or Ultra Low Cost Carriers

AC Widebody pilots are the lowest paid on the globe

US ULCCs flying 320s pay more than mighty 777 Captains

This doesn't even include the 3rd world working conditions

Is there a better term to describe AC now?


Low Cost Legacy: All the perks without the pay

Bush League Legacy: You get the hat of a legacy carrier with a contract that rivals the bush
Second post?

You definitely are trying to stir the pot. I like it! Keep up the good work.
---------- ADS -----------
 
bradleyscotts
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2023 9:35 am

Re: Is AC considered a Legacy Airline anymore?

Post by bradleyscotts »

ameliapilote wrote: Wed Apr 05, 2023 5:55 am Given the pay in comparison to North American legacy carriers, is AC even considered a legacy airline anymore?

The pilots look and dress like Delta, American and United but the new hire pay is less than Canadian regionals or Ultra Low Cost Carriers

AC Widebody pilots are the lowest paid on the globe

US ULCCs flying 320s pay more than mighty 777 Captains

This doesn't even include the 3rd world working conditions

Is there a better term to describe AC now?


Low Cost Legacy: All the perks without the pay

Bush League Legacy: You get the hat of a legacy carrier with a contract that rivals the bush
Legacy Airline is a US term for carriers that existed before the Airline Deregulation Act in 1978 and were affected by it. Air Canada falls within that description because it is the only current carrier that was around in 1978. Pilot pay has nothing to do with being a legacy carrier.
AC Widebody pilots are the lowest paid on the globe
They are underpaid when compared to US Carriers. They are not making less than pilots at LAN, Air Mexico, Avianca, just to name a few in our side of the world.
This doesn't even include the 3rd world working conditions
You think working conditions for pilots at AC are 3rd world? come on now. They are not the greatest no argument there, but to compare it to the 3rd world tells me 2 things. You don't work at AC and have no idea what 3rd world conditions are. This statement is nothing more than hyperbole.
Is there a better term to describe AC now?
I would describe AC as the best 705 carrier in Canada. However, is up to each of us as individuals to decide if its best for us. Are you young and wanna see the world? Noone else in Canada will provide you with as much variety and overall compensation. If you are older and have financial responsibilities others don't its certainly not the best place for you.

The one thing we all have to do is leave every place we work at much better than when were first hired. Demographics at AC are changing, and while some can be extreme you can see this huge ship is starting to turn. We must put an end to concessionary bargaining. We must also stop the mentality that "we don't negotiate for pilots not on property" and finally the "I went through it as well so stop complaining" to justify the inadequacies of our contract.

WS pilots are in a position to lead the pilot profession in Canada out of the gutter. We must all support them in their fight for better wages and working conditions. Realize that they are fighting for all of us not just them.
---------- ADS -----------
 
noreasterYHZ
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2022 5:59 am

Re: Is AC considered a Legacy Airline anymore?

Post by noreasterYHZ »

bradleyscotts wrote: Wed Apr 05, 2023 6:35 am
ameliapilote wrote: Wed Apr 05, 2023 5:55 am Given the pay in comparison to North American legacy carriers, is AC even considered a legacy airline anymore?

The pilots look and dress like Delta, American and United but the new hire pay is less than Canadian regionals or Ultra Low Cost Carriers

AC Widebody pilots are the lowest paid on the globe

US ULCCs flying 320s pay more than mighty 777 Captains

This doesn't even include the 3rd world working conditions

Is there a better term to describe AC now?


Low Cost Legacy: All the perks without the pay

Bush League Legacy: You get the hat of a legacy carrier with a contract that rivals the bush
Legacy Airline is a US term for carriers that existed before the Airline Deregulation Act in 1978 and were affected by it. Air Canada falls within that description because it is the only current carrier that was around in 1978. Pilot pay has nothing to do with being a legacy carrier.
AC Widebody pilots are the lowest paid on the globe
They are underpaid when compared to US Carriers. They are not making less than pilots at LAN, Air Mexico, Avianca, just to name a few in our side of the world.
This doesn't even include the 3rd world working conditions
You think working conditions for pilots at AC are 3rd world? come on now. They are not the greatest no argument there, but to compare it to the 3rd world tells me 2 things. You don't work at AC and have no idea what 3rd world conditions are. This statement is nothing more than hyperbole.
Is there a better term to describe AC now?
I would describe AC as the best 705 carrier in Canada. However, is up to each of us as individuals to decide if its best for us. Are you young and wanna see the world? Noone else in Canada will provide you with as much variety and overall compensation. If you are older and have financial responsibilities others don't its certainly not the best place for you.

The one thing we all have to do is leave every place we work at much better than when were first hired. Demographics at AC are changing, and while some can be extreme you can see this huge ship is starting to turn. We must put an end to concessionary bargaining. We must also stop the mentality that "we don't negotiate for pilots not on property" and finally the "I went through it as well so stop complaining" to justify the inadequacies of our contract.

WS pilots are in a position to lead the pilot profession in Canada out of the gutter.We must all support them in their fight for better wagesand working conditions. Realize that they are fighting for all of us not just them.
That should pretty much sums up the state of this "legacy carrier"

A year 1995 founded Low Cost Carrier is the company that has to lead the profession out of the gutter

AC is very much a Bush League operation mentality that operates like a global airline
---------- ADS -----------
 
Montroyal
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 62
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2021 2:29 pm

Re: Is AC considered a Legacy Airline anymore?

Post by Montroyal »

bradleyscotts wrote: Wed Apr 05, 2023 6:35 am
ameliapilote wrote: Wed Apr 05, 2023 5:55 am Given the pay in comparison to North American legacy carriers, is AC even considered a legacy airline anymore?

The pilots look and dress like Delta, American and United but the new hire pay is less than Canadian regionals or Ultra Low Cost Carriers

AC Widebody pilots are the lowest paid on the globe

US ULCCs flying 320s pay more than mighty 777 Captains

This doesn't even include the 3rd world working conditions

Is there a better term to describe AC now?


Low Cost Legacy: All the perks without the pay

Bush League Legacy: You get the hat of a legacy carrier with a contract that rivals the bush
Legacy Airline is a US term for carriers that existed before the Airline Deregulation Act in 1978 and were affected by it. Air Canada falls within that description because it is the only current carrier that was around in 1978. Pilot pay has nothing to do with being a legacy carrier.
AC Widebody pilots are the lowest paid on the globe
They are underpaid when compared to US Carriers. They are not making less than pilots at LAN, Air Mexico, Avianca, just to name a few in our side of the world.
This doesn't even include the 3rd world working conditions
You think working conditions for pilots at AC are 3rd world? come on now. They are not the greatest no argument there, but to compare it to the 3rd world tells me 2 things. You don't work at AC and have no idea what 3rd world conditions are. This statement is nothing more than hyperbole.
Is there a better term to describe AC now?
I would describe AC as the best 705 carrier in Canada. However, is up to each of us as individuals to decide if its best for us. Are you young and wanna see the world? Noone else in Canada will provide you with as much variety and overall compensation. If you are older and have financial responsibilities others don't its certainly not the best place for you.

The one thing we all have to do is leave every place we work at much better than when were first hired. Demographics at AC are changing, and while some can be extreme you can see this huge ship is starting to turn. We must put an end to concessionary bargaining. We must also stop the mentality that "we don't negotiate for pilots not on property" and finally the "I went through it as well so stop complaining" to justify the inadequacies of our contract.

WS pilots are in a position to lead the pilot profession in Canada out of the gutter. We must all support them in their fight for better wages and working conditions. Realize that they are fighting for all of us not just them.
Lol!!!

Air Mexico 787 FOs make $55k per year??

Please tell me you actually know something about anything

Always amazed on the ignorance of Air Canada Pilots

At least we make more than Kalitta Air!

Actually...you don't
---------- ADS -----------
 
dumpsterfire
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2021 5:58 pm

Re: Is AC considered a Legacy Airline anymore?

Post by dumpsterfire »

Calin used to compare AC to North American Legacy carriers

Then the data got so bad the narrative had to change

We went from comparing ourselves to Delta, to alternative US companies to now having to look at 3rd world countries
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by dumpsterfire on Wed Apr 05, 2023 9:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
cdnavater
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1351
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2021 11:25 am

Re: Is AC considered a Legacy Airline anymore?

Post by cdnavater »

noreasterYHZ wrote: Wed Apr 05, 2023 8:47 am
bradleyscotts wrote: Wed Apr 05, 2023 6:35 am
ameliapilote wrote: Wed Apr 05, 2023 5:55 am Given the pay in comparison to North American legacy carriers, is AC even considered a legacy airline anymore?

The pilots look and dress like Delta, American and United but the new hire pay is less than Canadian regionals or Ultra Low Cost Carriers

AC Widebody pilots are the lowest paid on the globe

US ULCCs flying 320s pay more than mighty 777 Captains

This doesn't even include the 3rd world working conditions

Is there a better term to describe AC now?


Low Cost Legacy: All the perks without the pay

Bush League Legacy: You get the hat of a legacy carrier with a contract that rivals the bush
Legacy Airline is a US term for carriers that existed before the Airline Deregulation Act in 1978 and were affected by it. Air Canada falls within that description because it is the only current carrier that was around in 1978. Pilot pay has nothing to do with being a legacy carrier.
AC Widebody pilots are the lowest paid on the globe
They are underpaid when compared to US Carriers. They are not making less than pilots at LAN, Air Mexico, Avianca, just to name a few in our side of the world.
This doesn't even include the 3rd world working conditions
You think working conditions for pilots at AC are 3rd world? come on now. They are not the greatest no argument there, but to compare it to the 3rd world tells me 2 things. You don't work at AC and have no idea what 3rd world conditions are. This statement is nothing more than hyperbole.
Is there a better term to describe AC now?
I would describe AC as the best 705 carrier in Canada. However, is up to each of us as individuals to decide if its best for us. Are you young and wanna see the world? Noone else in Canada will provide you with as much variety and overall compensation. If you are older and have financial responsibilities others don't its certainly not the best place for you.

The one thing we all have to do is leave every place we work at much better than when were first hired. Demographics at AC are changing, and while some can be extreme you can see this huge ship is starting to turn. We must put an end to concessionary bargaining. We must also stop the mentality that "we don't negotiate for pilots not on property" and finally the "I went through it as well so stop complaining" to justify the inadequacies of our contract.

WS pilots are in a position to lead the pilot profession in Canada out of the gutter.We must all support them in their fight for better wagesand working conditions. Realize that they are fighting for all of us not just them.
That should pretty much sums up the state of this "legacy carrier"

A year 1995 founded Low Cost Carrier is the company that has to lead the profession out of the gutter

AC is very much a Bush League operation mentality that operates like a global airline
I didn’t understand what bradleyscotts was saying the way you did, the fact of the matter is, that low cost founded in 1995 put downward pressure on the industry, however they are now first up to bat with an expired contract and a strike vote.
If they settle for 10% over three years, what chance does anyone else have when it’s their turn.
As for AC, you could almost look at them as two airlines, a NA carrier and an international carrier, which is where negotiations should go. The narrow body should be compared to any narrow body that operates into and out of Canada and the widebody should be compared to the same operations into and out of Canada, those would be paying the same fees, so apples to apples.
---------- ADS -----------
 
rudder
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3857
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 12:10 pm

Re: Is AC considered a Legacy Airline anymore?

Post by rudder »

cdnavater wrote: Wed Apr 05, 2023 9:08 am
I didn’t understand what bradleyscotts was saying the way you did, the fact of the matter is, that low cost founded in 1995 put downward pressure on the industry, however they are now first up to bat with an expired contract and a strike vote.
If they settle for 10% over three years, what chance does anyone else have when it’s their turn.
As for AC, you could almost look at them as two airlines, a NA carrier and an international carrier, which is where negotiations should go. The narrow body should be compared to any narrow body that operates into and out of Canada and the widebody should be compared to the same operations into and out of Canada, those would be paying the same fees, so apples to apples.
On a currency adjusted basis, AC is winning the lottery in terms of the pilot labour cost component of CASM. Throw in pay rates and benefit expense, and that advantage grows even larger.

AC is not and never will be an LCC or ULCC. Any cost comparisons to that segment are meaningless.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Tbayer2021
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 485
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2021 7:18 am

Re: Is AC considered a Legacy Airline anymore?

Post by Tbayer2021 »

Imagine comparing yourself to 3rd world country airlines to justify your position. Even then you're probably still wrong. Man that kool-aid they serve must be real strong. Is that what new hires are told these days? That they get paid better than Mexican and Colombian pilots? I guess they must have switched from the NHL of airlines to the Copa America of airlines.
---------- ADS -----------
 
RochVoisine
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2023 6:47 pm

Re: Is AC considered a Legacy Airline anymore?

Post by RochVoisine »

I'm surprised some people on here aren't using Air Tajikistan, Kenya Airways and Air Cubana as comparables and saying if you don't like it, just be happy you don't fly for Air Afghanistan
---------- ADS -----------
 
eurotrash
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2022 7:22 am

Re: Is AC considered a Legacy Airline anymore?

Post by eurotrash »

RochVoisine wrote: Wed Apr 05, 2023 9:39 am I'm surprised some people on here aren't using Air Tajikistan, Kenya Airways and Air Cubana as comparables and saying if you don't like it, just be happy you don't fly for Air Afghanistan
The Former YVR Base Chair who knew better than the recall results told me that he thinks we should be comparing ourselves to Air China

True Story
---------- ADS -----------
 
Tavpi
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2023 8:34 pm

Re: Is AC considered a Legacy Airline anymore?

Post by Tavpi »

eurotrash wrote: Wed Apr 05, 2023 1:00 pm
RochVoisine wrote: Wed Apr 05, 2023 9:39 am I'm surprised some people on here aren't using Air Tajikistan, Kenya Airways and Air Cubana as comparables and saying if you don't like it, just be happy you don't fly for Air Afghanistan
The Former YVR Base Chair who knew better than the recall results told me that he thinks we should be comparing ourselves to Air China

True Story
I mean, as a nation we are heading that way, so he ain't wrong.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Winnikegger
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 24
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2022 10:48 am

Re: Is AC considered a Legacy Airline anymore?

Post by Winnikegger »

Tavpi wrote: Wed Apr 05, 2023 2:52 pm
eurotrash wrote: Wed Apr 05, 2023 1:00 pm
RochVoisine wrote: Wed Apr 05, 2023 9:39 am I'm surprised some people on here aren't using Air Tajikistan, Kenya Airways and Air Cubana as comparables and saying if you don't like it, just be happy you don't fly for Air Afghanistan
The Former YVR Base Chair who knew better than the recall results told me that he thinks we should be comparing ourselves to Air China

True Story
I mean, as a nation we are heading that way, so he ain't wrong.
Lol...well the Winnipeg base chair RW doesn't even show up to his base events anymore. He didn't even show up to yesterday's ALPA presentation & social in Winnipeg

No time to show up when he is fully displaced. Lots of time to do voluntary overtime though

The old guard could not exit stage left soon enough
---------- ADS -----------
 
Dronepiper
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 243
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2020 10:22 pm

Re: Is AC considered a Legacy Airline anymore?

Post by Dronepiper »

Does anyone have the aeromexico payscale? What about Qantas (Australia)?

Australia is probably the closest comparison to Canada. They actually have less airplanes and a smaller population, but I guarantee their widebody FO’s don’t make 54k a year.
---------- ADS -----------
 
GeoffPilot
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2022 2:06 pm

Re: Is AC considered a Legacy Airline anymore?

Post by GeoffPilot »

Dronepiper wrote: Wed Apr 05, 2023 5:16 pm Does anyone have the aeromexico payscale? What about Qantas (Australia)?

Australia is probably the closest comparison to Canada. They actually have less airplanes and a smaller population, but I guarantee their widebody FO’s don’t make 54k a year.
Australia competes on transborder with US airlines and tries to steal their passengers through 6th Freedom of air?

And no widebody FOs in the world make $54k per year besides the pilots at Air Canada
---------- ADS -----------
 
Crewbunk
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 205
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2020 8:46 am

Re: Is AC considered a Legacy Airline anymore?

Post by Crewbunk »

GeoffPilot wrote: Wed Apr 05, 2023 5:38 pm
Dronepiper wrote: Wed Apr 05, 2023 5:16 pm Does anyone have the aeromexico payscale? What about Qantas (Australia)?

Australia is probably the closest comparison to Canada. They actually have less airplanes and a smaller population, but I guarantee their widebody FO’s don’t make 54k a year.
Australia competes on transborder with US airlines and tries to steal their passengers through 6th Freedom of air?

And no widebody FOs in the world make $54k per year besides the pilots at Air Canada
Does Qantas have new hires flying WideBody right seat? Serious question, as that really is the issue.

First year flat pay is $58,522. Whether one is Triple F/O, A220 F/O or 787 R/P, etc. Year 5 Triple F/O at AC makes $164,750, 12 year Triple F/O makes $207,162. 80 hour month, 2023 rates. No draft. No VO.
---------- ADS -----------
 
aeronauticaldisaster
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 40
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2021 1:18 pm

Re: Is AC considered a Legacy Airline anymore?

Post by aeronauticaldisaster »

Crewbunk wrote: Wed Apr 05, 2023 8:08 pm
GeoffPilot wrote: Wed Apr 05, 2023 5:38 pm
Dronepiper wrote: Wed Apr 05, 2023 5:16 pm Does anyone have the aeromexico payscale? What about Qantas (Australia)?

Australia is probably the closest comparison to Canada. They actually have less airplanes and a smaller population, but I guarantee their widebody FO’s don’t make 54k a year.
Australia competes on transborder with US airlines and tries to steal their passengers through 6th Freedom of air?

And no widebody FOs in the world make $54k per year besides the pilots at Air Canada
Does Qantas have new hires flying WideBody right seat? Serious question, as that really is the issue.

First year flat pay is $58,522. Whether one is Triple F/O, A220 F/O or 787 R/P, etc. Year 5 Triple F/O at AC makes $164,750, 12 year Triple F/O makes $207,162. 80 hour month, 2023 rates. No draft. No VO.
Hold on a sec...

You're saying 4 yrs of flat pay isn't an issue?

The geniuses at ACPA recommended this scheme in the 10 yrs deal that made 50% of pilots now on property indentured servants.

This needs to be killed once and for all
---------- ADS -----------
 
Crewbunk
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 205
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2020 8:46 am

Re: Is AC considered a Legacy Airline anymore?

Post by Crewbunk »

aeronauticaldisaster wrote: Thu Apr 06, 2023 6:35 am Hold on a sec...

You're saying 4 yrs of flat pay isn't an issue?

The geniuses at ACPA recommended this scheme in the 10 yrs deal that made 50% of pilots now on property indentured servants.

This needs to be killed once and for all
Hold on a sec …..

Where did I say flat pay wasn’t an issue? It’s a huge issue, well known among the ranks of Air Canada’s pilots. But, it is in the contract and will remain until the contract is renegotiated. Or …. until AC can no longer staff new hire classes, which doesn’t appear to be happening any time soon.

What the issue really is, is the turn of events that places a 1-4 year pilot in the right seat of a wide body. Things are moving so quickly, with hiring at an all time high, these anomalies pop up. I don’t think anyone foresaw a set of circumstances where with hiring as it is, retiring as it is and modest expansion that a quarter of the pilots would be on flat pay.

The last time I saw anything similar was about 25 years ago when new-hires were placed as 767 F/Os as no one bid the bottom, as the bottom was doing nothing but Rapidairs.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
jpilot77
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 684
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 5:11 pm
Location: North of YMX

Re: Is AC considered a Legacy Airline anymore?

Post by jpilot77 »

Crewbunk wrote: Thu Apr 06, 2023 7:17 am
aeronauticaldisaster wrote: Thu Apr 06, 2023 6:35 am Hold on a sec...

You're saying 4 yrs of flat pay isn't an issue?

The geniuses at ACPA recommended this scheme in the 10 yrs deal that made 50% of pilots now on property indentured servants.

This needs to be killed once and for all
Hold on a sec …..

Where did I say flat pay wasn’t an issue? It’s a huge issue, well known among the ranks of Air Canada’s pilots. But, it is in the contract and will remain until the contract is renegotiated. Or …. until AC can no longer staff new hire classes, which doesn’t appear to be happening any time soon.

What the issue really is, is the turn of events that places a 1-4 year pilot in the right seat of a wide body. Things are moving so quickly, with hiring at an all time high, these anomalies pop up. I don’t think anyone foresaw a set of circumstances where with hiring as it is, retiring as it is and modest expansion that a quarter of the pilots would be on flat pay.

The last time I saw anything similar was about 25 years ago when new-hires were placed as 767 F/Os as no one bid the bottom, as the bottom was doing nothing but Rapidairs.
They’ll never run out of candidates to fill new hire courses. But they are starting to worry about the experience going forward. The 4 years of flat pay is a problem for the company in attracting high experience pilots.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Welcome to Redneck Airlines. We might not get you there but we'll get you close!
Post Reply

Return to “Air Canada”