Porter vs AC
Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, I WAS Birddog
-
- Rank 3
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2021 9:56 pm
Porter vs AC
50 percent up the porter master seniority list, 28 years old YTZ based FO, 1900 flight hours.
Still most people I talk to recommend I go to AC for my career, especially older guys. Thats it's simply the best place to be even if you'll be more junior, and even if I've mostly missed this hiring wave.
Whats people take on this? Need advice please and thanks.
Still most people I talk to recommend I go to AC for my career, especially older guys. Thats it's simply the best place to be even if you'll be more junior, and even if I've mostly missed this hiring wave.
Whats people take on this? Need advice please and thanks.
-
- Rank 0
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2024 2:52 pm
Re: Porter vs AC
A friend’s son joined at 26, was assigned 330 F/O, now at age 28 is a new 320 CA. He did join with jet time from corporate.
-
- Rank 3
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2021 4:01 pm
Re: Porter vs AC
Nah brah I don’t think you have missed any hiring wave
At 28… that’s like 37 years of service if you want it
I heard Air Canada will hire lots of guys in the coming years, especially if they expand… I think you would be just fine
At 28… that’s like 37 years of service if you want it
I heard Air Canada will hire lots of guys in the coming years, especially if they expand… I think you would be just fine
-
- Rank 0
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2023 7:37 am
Re: Porter vs AC
How are you at 50% of the master seniority list with 1900 hrs?
-
- Rank 3
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2021 9:56 pm
Re: Porter vs AC
Was hired right before we started getting the E2 jets, and we've doubled our pilot group in those 1.5 years. In 2 years with even more hiring and jets I should be roughly 20 percent master seniority. If I stay here i should hold off Christmas my whole career I'd figure.Kennythegreat wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 6:51 am How are you at 50% of the master seniority list with 1900 hrs?
Re: Porter vs AC
Never an easy choice to make.pitottubey wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 7:22 amWas hired right before we started getting the E2 jets, and we've doubled our pilot group in those 1.5 years. In 2 years with even more hiring and jets I should be roughly 20 percent master seniority. If I stay here i should hold off Christmas my whole career I'd figure.Kennythegreat wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 6:51 am How are you at 50% of the master seniority list with 1900 hrs?
I guess it boils down to do you think Porter will stick around in the coming years. Amazing lifestyle if you have a fulfilling career there do you have seniority projections there? Will you be number 1 system wide before retirement?
-
- Rank 5
- Posts: 353
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2022 4:51 pm
Re: Porter vs AC
It's a difficult position to be in for sure. Personally, I'm willing to "let it ride" on Porter since I think the expansion will sink or establish us in the next couple years and the payoff of enjoying that seniority for the next 3 decades seems worth it. Worst case Porter folds and we go to the next thing like many people have had to do. Basically in my opinion, the upside of staying and it working out outweigh the downside of it not working out and having to start over.pitottubey wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 7:22 amWas hired right before we started getting the E2 jets, and we've doubled our pilot group in those 1.5 years. In 2 years with even more hiring and jets I should be roughly 20 percent master seniority. If I stay here i should hold off Christmas my whole career I'd figure.Kennythegreat wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 6:51 am How are you at 50% of the master seniority list with 1900 hrs?
-
- Rank 3
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2021 9:56 pm
Re: Porter vs AC
Who knows. If they can survive the next 5 years or so the path is def more clear. But I should make my decision before that obviously, I have to decide ideally now if I want to go to AC or not, and get my number asap. If I stayed at porter I'm sure Id have incredibly high seniority before retirement (assuming we don't go under) but not number 1 system wide.Flyboy736 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 9:08 amNever an easy choice to make.pitottubey wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 7:22 amWas hired right before we started getting the E2 jets, and we've doubled our pilot group in those 1.5 years. In 2 years with even more hiring and jets I should be roughly 20 percent master seniority. If I stay here i should hold off Christmas my whole career I'd figure.Kennythegreat wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 6:51 am How are you at 50% of the master seniority list with 1900 hrs?
I guess it boils down to do you think Porter will stick around in the coming years. Amazing lifestyle if you have a fulfilling career there do you have seniority projections there? Will you be number 1 system wide before retirement?
Re: Porter vs AC
At this point, REALLY think it over. If you are willing to give up lifestyle for a few years while you're young - there's that.pitottubey wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 6:42 pmWho knows. If they can survive the next 5 years or so the path is def more clear. But I should make my decision before that obviously, I have to decide ideally now if I want to go to AC or not, and get my number asap. If I stayed at porter I'm sure Id have incredibly high seniority before retirement (assuming we don't go under) but not number 1 system wide.Flyboy736 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 9:08 amNever an easy choice to make.pitottubey wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 7:22 am
Was hired right before we started getting the E2 jets, and we've doubled our pilot group in those 1.5 years. In 2 years with even more hiring and jets I should be roughly 20 percent master seniority. If I stay here i should hold off Christmas my whole career I'd figure.
I guess it boils down to do you think Porter will stick around in the coming years. Amazing lifestyle if you have a fulfilling career there do you have seniority projections there? Will you be number 1 system wide before retirement?
-
- Rank 3
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2021 9:56 pm
Re: Porter vs AC
I'd be willing to have a shit schedule for 2 or 3 years ya, that seems more than worth it. Then delay the capt upgrade another 2 years for lifestyle. I'm not really sure what to expect timeline wise.
-
- Rank 2
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2019 9:23 am
Re: Porter vs AC
You seem to keep defending a stance at ac and opposing some people's opinion about staying at porter. Maybe unknowingly you have already made the decision just not realized it.pitottubey wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 8:03 pm I'd be willing to have a shit schedule for 2 or 3 years ya, that seems more than worth it. Then delay the capt upgrade another 2 years for lifestyle. I'm not really sure what to expect timeline wise.
-
- Rank 10
- Posts: 2376
- Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:24 am
Re: Porter vs AC
Will you need to commute for AC, but living at your base for Porter?
Commuting sucks. Even more when junior.
Commuting sucks. Even more when junior.
-
- Rank 3
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2021 9:56 pm
Re: Porter vs AC
Pearson is the closest base for me, so either way I want YYZ.goingnowherefast wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2024 4:20 am Will you need to commute for AC, but living at your base for Porter?
Commuting sucks. Even more when junior.
Re: Porter vs AC
OP I don't mean to be pessimistic but if you are basing AC on 3 years before you can upgrade you have a possibility of being disappointed. I'd be basing my decision to jump over with a more pessimistic view and be pleasantly surprised if proved wrong702pipeliner wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 8:33 pmYou seem to keep defending a stance at ac and opposing some people's opinion about staying at porter. Maybe unknowingly you have already made the decision just not realized it.pitottubey wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 8:03 pm I'd be willing to have a shit schedule for 2 or 3 years ya, that seems more than worth it. Then delay the capt upgrade another 2 years for lifestyle. I'm not really sure what to expect timeline wise.
Re: Porter vs AC
AC salary will go up this year, and flat pay will be 2 years at most, maybe 1 or none.
Porter will aggressively bump as well, but at the end of the day a pilot is generally paid by size, and you'll be making a lot more at AC.
Question is, 10 years down the road is a high seniority schedule at Porter better than 100k a year difference? Is there any schedule difference at all?
Porter will aggressively bump as well, but at the end of the day a pilot is generally paid by size, and you'll be making a lot more at AC.
Question is, 10 years down the road is a high seniority schedule at Porter better than 100k a year difference? Is there any schedule difference at all?
Re: Porter vs AC
Porter currently builds more growth in their salaries over a 12 year period. Yes, eventually you'll be on a 777/87, and yes if you're lucky enough to attain widebody, you will be paid decently well. But widebody flying should generally be reserved for young bodies. Guys flying overnight, across 19 timezones for 36 hours, then coming all the way back are going to be broken by the time they hit 65.Core wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2024 8:41 am AC salary will go up this year, and flat pay will be 2 years at most, maybe 1 or none.
Porter will aggressively bump as well, but at the end of the day a pilot is generally paid by size, and you'll be making a lot more at AC.
Question is, 10 years down the road is a high seniority schedule at Porter better than 100k a year difference? Is there any schedule difference at all?
-
- Rank 3
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2021 9:56 pm
Re: Porter vs AC
It's easy to build growth into the payscales when everyone is year 2 or less on the E2 payscales. Why not just put year 12 at 300,000! Doesn't matter anyways no ones on year 12.cjp wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2024 5:13 pmPorter currently builds more growth in their salaries over a 12 year period. Yes, eventually you'll be on a 777/87, and yes if you're lucky enough to attain widebody, you will be paid decently well. But widebody flying should generally be reserved for young bodies. Guys flying overnight, across 19 timezones for 36 hours, then coming all the way back are going to be broken by the time they hit 65.Core wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2024 8:41 am AC salary will go up this year, and flat pay will be 2 years at most, maybe 1 or none.
Porter will aggressively bump as well, but at the end of the day a pilot is generally paid by size, and you'll be making a lot more at AC.
Question is, 10 years down the road is a high seniority schedule at Porter better than 100k a year difference? Is there any schedule difference at all?
Re: Porter vs AC
Some are year 4 and 5 with the Dash carry over. I'll be year 3 this fall. You could say that about every new company, why have a payscale at all...just pay year to year.pitottubey wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2024 6:38 pmIt's easy to build growth into the payscales when everyone is year 2 or less on the E2 payscales. Why not just put year 12 at 300,000! Doesn't matter anyways no ones on year 12.cjp wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2024 5:13 pmPorter currently builds more growth in their salaries over a 12 year period. Yes, eventually you'll be on a 777/87, and yes if you're lucky enough to attain widebody, you will be paid decently well. But widebody flying should generally be reserved for young bodies. Guys flying overnight, across 19 timezones for 36 hours, then coming all the way back are going to be broken by the time they hit 65.Core wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2024 8:41 am AC salary will go up this year, and flat pay will be 2 years at most, maybe 1 or none.
Porter will aggressively bump as well, but at the end of the day a pilot is generally paid by size, and you'll be making a lot more at AC.
Question is, 10 years down the road is a high seniority schedule at Porter better than 100k a year difference? Is there any schedule difference at all?
- flying4dollars
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1408
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 8:56 am
Re: Porter vs AC
Someone here already mentioned it but it seems as though you've made your mind up and you just don't fully realize it yet and are coming on here for validation. The information out there on both companies and lifestyles is out there (you work for one so that should make it easy). What suits YOU best? Do that...pitottubey wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2024 6:38 pmIt's easy to build growth into the payscales when everyone is year 2 or less on the E2 payscales. Why not just put year 12 at 300,000! Doesn't matter anyways no ones on year 12.cjp wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2024 5:13 pmPorter currently builds more growth in their salaries over a 12 year period. Yes, eventually you'll be on a 777/87, and yes if you're lucky enough to attain widebody, you will be paid decently well. But widebody flying should generally be reserved for young bodies. Guys flying overnight, across 19 timezones for 36 hours, then coming all the way back are going to be broken by the time they hit 65.Core wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2024 8:41 am AC salary will go up this year, and flat pay will be 2 years at most, maybe 1 or none.
Porter will aggressively bump as well, but at the end of the day a pilot is generally paid by size, and you'll be making a lot more at AC.
Question is, 10 years down the road is a high seniority schedule at Porter better than 100k a year difference? Is there any schedule difference at all?
-
- Rank 7
- Posts: 597
- Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2021 4:27 pm
Re: Porter vs AC
So there’s YOS when going from the Q to the E2? I was under the impression it was like going from Encore to WJ and you start from the bottom again for pay.cjp wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2024 8:06 pmSome are year 4 and 5 with the Dash carry over. I'll be year 3 this fall. You could say that about every new company, why have a payscale at all...just pay year to year.pitottubey wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2024 6:38 pmIt's easy to build growth into the payscales when everyone is year 2 or less on the E2 payscales. Why not just put year 12 at 300,000! Doesn't matter anyways no ones on year 12.cjp wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2024 5:13 pm
Porter currently builds more growth in their salaries over a 12 year period. Yes, eventually you'll be on a 777/87, and yes if you're lucky enough to attain widebody, you will be paid decently well. But widebody flying should generally be reserved for young bodies. Guys flying overnight, across 19 timezones for 36 hours, then coming all the way back are going to be broken by the time they hit 65.
-
- Rank 0
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2022 6:17 pm
Re: Porter vs AC
Nope, no YOS transfer, to some extent even when you upgrade on the same type. Need 10+ years as a Dash Captain to get E2 Capt. Y2. 4 Years as an FO to get Capt. Y2 when upgrading. And no FO-FO YOS transfer whatsoever.Canadaflyer46 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 7:29 amSo there’s YOS when going from the Q to the E2? I was under the impression it was like going from Encore to WJ and you start from the bottom again for pay.cjp wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2024 8:06 pmSome are year 4 and 5 with the Dash carry over. I'll be year 3 this fall. You could say that about every new company, why have a payscale at all...just pay year to year.pitottubey wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2024 6:38 pm
It's easy to build growth into the payscales when everyone is year 2 or less on the E2 payscales. Why not just put year 12 at 300,000! Doesn't matter anyways no ones on year 12.
Re: Porter vs AC
It wasn't full YOS - I think for some of the 10-15 year crews, they gave them YR 2 and 3 on the E2 for their loyalty. Not sure if they removed that or if anyone actually qualifies.Canadaflyer46 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 7:29 amSo there’s YOS when going from the Q to the E2? I was under the impression it was like going from Encore to WJ and you start from the bottom again for pay.cjp wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2024 8:06 pmSome are year 4 and 5 with the Dash carry over. I'll be year 3 this fall. You could say that about every new company, why have a payscale at all...just pay year to year.pitottubey wrote: ↑Sat Apr 13, 2024 6:38 pm
It's easy to build growth into the payscales when everyone is year 2 or less on the E2 payscales. Why not just put year 12 at 300,000! Doesn't matter anyways no ones on year 12.
-
- Rank 4
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2018 8:18 pm
Re: Porter vs AC
Speaking from experience, the appeal of flying a big shinny jet fades quite quickly and lifestyle is the thing you start chasing!
IMO, if I were in your shoes I’d be staying at Porter. AC management have made it abundantly clear that Porter is a major thorn in their side. It would NOT surprise me if AC acquired Porter in the next 5(ish) years. Might be a crazy thought, but with the business model Porter has it’s going to cause AC issues for years to come.
I wouldn’t base this decision solely on this idea, but “IF” this happens there’ll be some sort of seniority integration and you’ll be laughing.
If it doesn’t, enjoy making a great wage and living an amazing life with Christmas off. You likely won’t see that for a while.
Just my 2 cents.
Good luck in your decision. It’s not an easy one, but sounds like you’re going about it the right way!
IMO, if I were in your shoes I’d be staying at Porter. AC management have made it abundantly clear that Porter is a major thorn in their side. It would NOT surprise me if AC acquired Porter in the next 5(ish) years. Might be a crazy thought, but with the business model Porter has it’s going to cause AC issues for years to come.
I wouldn’t base this decision solely on this idea, but “IF” this happens there’ll be some sort of seniority integration and you’ll be laughing.
If it doesn’t, enjoy making a great wage and living an amazing life with Christmas off. You likely won’t see that for a while.
Just my 2 cents.
Good luck in your decision. It’s not an easy one, but sounds like you’re going about it the right way!
-
- Rank 5
- Posts: 326
- Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2018 6:16 pm
Re: Porter vs AC
Now that would be something. Ditch Jazz, and integrate with an operation that has real potential for growth. Align the Porter rewards programs, ease the pain of the 220 engine issues and voila!Transition9er2 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 15, 2024 6:32 pm Speaking from experience, the appeal of flying a big shinny jet fades quite quickly and lifestyle is the thing you start chasing!
IMO, if I were in your shoes I’d be staying at Porter. AC management have made it abundantly clear that Porter is a major thorn in their side. It would NOT surprise me if AC acquired Porter in the next 5(ish) years. Might be a crazy thought, but with the business model Porter has it’s going to cause AC issues for years to come.
I wouldn’t base this decision solely on this idea, but “IF” this happens there’ll be some sort of seniority integration and you’ll be laughing.
If it doesn’t, enjoy making a great wage and living an amazing life with Christmas off. You likely won’t see that for a while.
Just my 2 cents.
Good luck in your decision. It’s not an easy one, but sounds like you’re going about it the right way!
Cuz I’m sure that’s what the Deluce’s intended it to be.
Worth more than Transat any day now.
I’d be very concerned/curious about a seniority integration with Porter should it happen.
Re: Porter vs AC
With less than optimal load factors porter is not making enough money to keep the first fins past heavy check. Their aircraft orders are to ensure a revolving door of new fins to replace the older ones. Having AC buy them has been Deluce’s game plan since their inception. Won’t happen.
As for the engine issues on the 220, the e195 uses PW as well. There’s a reason AC stepped away from the EMJ. Not enough seats for the operating costs to make money.
As for the engine issues on the 220, the e195 uses PW as well. There’s a reason AC stepped away from the EMJ. Not enough seats for the operating costs to make money.