BBC reports WTC 7's collapse before the event took place.

swede · Post by **swede** » Wed Feb 28, 2007 4:57 pm

The smoking guns continue to rear their ugly heads. This one is quite interesting and points towards a pre planned demo of WTC 7, a demo planned well before Sept. 11.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/fe ... estamp.htm

The following clip is a bit long, but the implications from it go to the heart of the greatest conspiracy theory of all time, namely the official version of what happened on 911. If you have the time to watch this, you will hear two on duty policeman swear on their lives that the Kean commission report on the Pentagon crash are both erroneous, and staged.

http://www.thepentacon.com/googlesmokinggun.htm

grimey · Post by **grimey** » Wed Feb 28, 2007 5:09 pm

It collapsed at 5:20 daylight time, not standard time. The clock is likely GMT. Awesome research by the source...

According to FEMA, WTC 7 collapsed at 5:20pm on the afternoon of 9/11. Since British Summer Time is five hours ahead of Eastern Standard Time, the BBC reported the collapse of Building 7 at 4:54PM EST, a full 26 minutes before it collapsed.

swede · Post by **swede** » Wed Feb 28, 2007 5:47 pm

If there was any remaining doubt that the BBC reported the collapse of Building 7 over 20 minutes before it fell then it has now evaporated with the discovery of footage from the BBC's News 24 channel that shows the time stamp at 21:54 (4:54PM EST) when news of the Salomon Brothers Building is first broadcast, a full 26 minutes in advance of its collapse.

Not gmt, nice try tho..

grimey · Post by **grimey** » Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:20 pm

4:54 EST is 34 minutes after the collapse, swede. September 11 is still in daylight savings time. Nice of your source to debunk itself.

swede · Post by **swede** » Wed Feb 28, 2007 7:40 pm

Looks like I stand corrected, I guess Jones is into disinfo or cannot account for savings time. As I see it, wtc 7 collapsed at 1720 EDT/2120 GMT. I believe the second link may be a little harder to refute. The final couple of seconds of flight 77 path do not square with the commission report.

Mac · Post by **Mac** » Thu Mar 01, 2007 5:54 am

I believe the time stamp is for the London time which is also one hour ahead of GMT for DST. Anyway, the building is standing right behind her during the feed.

Dust Devil · Post by **Dust Devil** » Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:10 am

If the rest of the world would use their brain and ditch this DST crap you would not get this confusion.

Floats · Post by **Floats** » Thu Mar 01, 2007 10:09 am

I find it impossible to fathom, that so many buy into this crap. For the 911 conspiracy to hold up, think of the logistics of planning, timing, and cost of pulling this off and covering it up. The claim that Bush and company actually pulled this off, is the same Bush and company that is bungling things up in Iraq. Give me break

spartacus · Post by **spartacus** » Thu Mar 01, 2007 11:18 am

Floats wrote:I find it impossible to fathom, that so many buy into this crap.

I find it unbelievable that people out there still think the government had nothing to do with it. So there.

Mr. North · Post by **Mr. North** » Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:38 pm

Floats wrote:...is the same Bush and company that is bungling things up in Iraq. Give me break

I'm skeptical of the 9/11 conspiracy myself but to say that Bush & Co. aren't bungling things in Iraq makes you look like a retard and your post irrelevant.

Go read a newspaper.

grimey · Post by **grimey** » Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:44 pm

Mr. North wrote:
Floats wrote:...is the same Bush and company that is bungling things up in Iraq. Give me break
I'm skeptical of the 9/11 conspiracy myself but to say that Bush & Co. aren't bungling things in Iraq makes you look like a retard and your post irrelevant.

So does reading incomprehension.

Or can you blame a guy for that when grammar goes out the window?

He was saying he can't believe that the same crowd that is responsible for the clusterfuck in Iraq pulled off a massive conspiracy without anyone leaking word of it.

Dash-Ate · Post by **Dash-Ate** » Thu Mar 01, 2007 5:54 pm

Here is a massive close up pic of the scene. DO not click if you have dialup!

jetA did this?

http://cdn-90.liveleak.com/liveleak/6/a ... cphoto.jpg

desksgo · Post by **desksgo** » Thu Mar 01, 2007 6:51 pm

No, two gigantic buildings imploding did that. I don't see that as so unbelievable.

Floats · Post by **Floats** » Thu Mar 01, 2007 6:51 pm

Mr North, go @#$! yourself, understand that one

my point was, given the Bush administration handling of things overseas, there is no way they could possibly pull off a conspircy and cover up of that magnitude

Floats

Floats · Post by **Floats** » Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:12 pm

I always ask those who believe that an airplane did not crash into the pentagon, where’s the plane then? If the Americans shot it down somewhere? why not say they did? I would have to think the public would understand, given that 2 airplanes crashed into the WTC . Why then fire a missile into the Pentagon? That doesn’t make any sense.

I don’t have a problem with people questioning the report, who knows, there quite possibly was things left off in order to safe some bureaucrats ass. Who cares. bottem line, 4 airplanes were hijacked by terrorists, 4 airplanes are now missing. Good thing there is ample footage of 2 of them flying into the WTC, or you nutbars would be refuting that happened

floats

swede · Post by **swede** » Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:33 pm

Back to WTC 7, regardless of time discrepancies, the collapse of that building could not have been anything but pre planned.

http://infowars.net/articles/march2007/ ... C_WTC7.htm

Floats · Post by **Floats** » Thu Mar 01, 2007 9:43 pm

wow, you've convinced me! citing infowars.net you should check out Suckers.com

Pilot_adam · Post by **Pilot_adam** » Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:32 am

Floats wrote:I always ask those who believe that an airplane did not crash into the pentagon, where’s the plane then? If the Americans shot it down somewhere? why not say they did? I would have to think the public would understand, given that 2 airplanes crashed into the WTC . Why then fire a missile into the Pentagon? That doesn’t make any sense.

I don’t have a problem with people questioning the report, who knows, there quite possibly was things left off in order to safe some bureaucrats ass. Who cares. bottem line, 4 airplanes were hijacked by terrorists, 4 airplanes are now missing. Good thing there is ample footage of 2 of them flying into the WTC, or you nutbars would be refuting that happened

floats

Ok 4 airplanes where hijacked

1- Two where seen on footage and eye witnesses crashing into the WTC.

2- One is supposed to have crashed into the pentagon.

3- WHERE IS THE FOURTH ONE ??!!!!

All emergency crews said they never seen a plane ,just a hole in the ground (How can an airplane disappear that quick).

No disrespect floats but something is fishy here

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... ose+change

Cheers
Adam

desksgo · Post by **desksgo** » Fri Mar 02, 2007 5:55 am

No disrespect floats but something is fishy here

Is your girlfriend nearby?

goates · Post by **goates** » Fri Mar 02, 2007 7:55 am

desksgo wrote:

No disrespect floats but something is fishy here

Is your girlfriend nearby?

Would this be a good time for a "Yo momma" joke??

2R · Post by 2R » Fri Mar 02, 2007 8:18 am

Smells like fish tastes like chicken

Or who was it that said cabbage

Pilot_adam · Post by **Pilot_adam** » Fri Mar 02, 2007 8:37 am

desksgo wrote:

No disrespect floats but something is fishy here

Is your girlfriend nearby?

I guess I'm busted !!!

Expat · Post by **Expat** » Sun Mar 04, 2007 12:55 am

Based on my observations of what goes on in the world, it is highly improbable that AQ planned these attacks. They cannot even plan suicide bomb attacks properly.
Only one organization has in the past conducted such a precise operation. The Israeli government at Entebbe.

looproll · Post by **looproll** » Sun Mar 04, 2007 1:44 am

the time stamp on my camera tells me it's 1994

Expat · Post by **Expat** » Sun Mar 04, 2007 4:43 am

looproll wrote:the time stamp on my camera tells me it's 1994

It is time you changed your roll of film...it is probably expired...

BBC reports WTC 7's collapse before the event took place.

BBC reports WTC 7's collapse before the event took place.

conspiricy junkies

Re: conspiricy junkies

Re: conspiricy junkies

Re: conspiricy junkies