Stumper. Or maybe not.

This forum has been developed to discuss flight instruction/University and College programs.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, Right Seat Captain, lilfssister, North Shore

Post Reply
AFC
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:04 pm

Stumper. Or maybe not.

Post by AFC »

Maybe one of you has the answer to this one.

When looking on the LO charts, specifically LO 4, on V300 between Gros Cap and Thunder Bay VORs, near the midway point there is an MEA GAP. Another appears on V36 between Wawa and Thunder Bay with MEA GAP 6 NM.

We can't figure out what the GAP means. We've looked on the legend and it's not there neither is it in the instrument procedures manual. Over to you.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
4Stroke
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 164
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 8:35 am

Re: Stumper. Or maybe not.

Post by 4Stroke »

It means that the reception of the required nav-aids (i.e. VOR-VOR or VOR-NDB, etc.) may not be guaranteed in that 'gap'....it is beyond line-of sight range for that little bit, IF you are flying AT the MEA.

Instead of raising the entire MEA along that route, it's just stated as a 'gap'. Obstacle clearance (MOCA) is unchanged.

nowadays with GPS/FMS navigation, an MEA gap is inconsequential. Mostly, anyway.

Hope that helps.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
SplitS
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 392
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2004 11:36 am
Location: Inverted

Re: Stumper. Or maybe not.

Post by SplitS »

Didnt the "GAP" used to mean Saskatchewan? :mrgreen:
---------- ADS -----------
 
Keep flying till the noise stops.
Sasky
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 41
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 7:03 pm

Re: Stumper. Or maybe not.

Post by Sasky »

Didnt the "GAP" used to mean Saskatchewan?
Jerk :smt014
---------- ADS -----------
 
When the F*CK did we get ice cream?

Thats the way she goes boys.

Lets sacrifice him to the crops
Post Reply

Return to “Flight Training”