http://www.prostatecancer.ca/In-The-New ... aning.aspx
This illness has recently crept into my life on a personal level. We've see the strength of the Pink campaign in support of a worthy well organized cause by the womens movement in support of breast cancer research. However here is something that is not well known regarding prostate cancer;
Breast cancer and prostate cancer are the two most frequently diagnosed cancers in the United States and Canada. How do they fare in government supported cancer research funding? After doing some research while sitting in the hospital I found that in 1998 there were 184,500 new cases of breast cancer and 178,700 new cases of prostate cancer - almost identical.
Deaths in 1998 were 43,500 for breast cancer and 39,200 for prostate cancer - within 10% of each other. However, funding for the National Cancer Institute was vastly different - $433 million for breast cancer compared to $114 million for prostate cancer. I don't get it???
If my math is correct...and I think it is, this works out to about $10,000 per breast cancer death but only $2,900 for each prostate cancer death - a difference of 71%. On a per patient basis, the disparity is even greater; breast cancer received $2,400 per newly diagnosed patient while prostate cancer received only $600. That's 75% less.
Why the huge difference? Women involved in the breast cancer movement deserve much of the credit. For years they have worked tirelessly to increase awareness, not only on the part of the general public, but also on the part of our elected officials. Newly-diagnosed patients and survivors, along with their family and friends, are actively recruited not only to participate in awareness and fund raising activities, but also to telephone, fax, e-mail, and write their Federal MP's representatives.Their success is proof that political activism works.
To that end, the National Prostate Cancer Coalition (NPCC) was formed in 1996. Its goal was to start a grassroots movement that would get men as involved in the fight for increased funding for prostate cancer research as women are for breast cancer. How successful has this been?
In 1996 federal funding for prostate cancer research was $85 million. In 1998 it was $114 million. For fiscal year 1999, US Congress authorized $170 million. These are great strides, but still a far cry from the $433 million for breast cancer research. And unfortunately, the $170 million is part of an Omnibus Budget Bill and not specifically earmarked.
This maybe a part for 748 Ho...."Men, you have not raised your voices loudly enough!!!!! "
You, your families, and your friends need to write to your elected officials to DEMAND that the $170 million authorized be specifically allocated to prostate cancer research funding. You need to convince Ottawa to make prostate cancer research as high a priority as breast cancer research. You need create more awareness about prostate cancer. In order to be as successful as the women, you need to get out and work as hard as they have.
Given the $100 billion in economic loss each year due to cancer, research funding should be viewed not as a COST, but rather as an INVESTMENT in the future, which in the long run is bound to save not only lives, but also money.
In conclusion, I call upon ALL company leaders to support this cause by contributing by buying the Blue Tie from http://www.prostatecancer.ca AND/OR allowing your front line staff to use this Blue Tie as part of the unifom in some capacity. It's a blue tie AND it should match ALL aviation uniforms

http://www.prostatecancer.ca/In-The-New ... aning.aspx
http://www.prostatecancer.ca/Get-Involv ... ndise.aspx
Thanks for reading.
IABD