skysix wrote:
Glad I don't fly with you - attitudes like that are dangerous.
Don't worry - you never will.
So you think it's dangerous? Based on your 3600hrs "in the back?" You, I'm afraid, are confusing several points, and I can assure you your perspective is one based on a very narrow cross-section of experiences. Your pilots' are not, nor are mine. That "dangerous" attitude has kept me and all of my customers safe for many years working in places I'm sure you would have some difficulty envisioning.
skysix wrote:
There is a difference between all three of what is legal, what is safe, and what you think can do because of your skill, education. experience and training.
Well, at least you seem to agree on one point - however I suspect your intent with that statement is somewhat different than mine reading it.
skysix wrote:
And before you ask, I've been medcrew since 1993, 3600+ hours 'in the back' in more than a dozen types and with many different operators in YT, NT, NU, BC, AB, SK, ON, PQ, WA, OR, ID, CA, NV, AZ, UT, CO, NM
I'm not asking, because quite frankly, it really doesn't matter.
That, is my point. I know everyone wants to be "involved" these days, and feel part of the team, but I'm afraid there's considerably more to it than that. If you don't have the confidence in your flight crews to make the proper decisions that won't "kill you," then I suggest you either choose another employer or look for a ground job. Pilots kills medics....?
You're welcome for all those flights you've taken in abject safety since 1993...
stl