The million dollar questions...

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, I WAS Birddog

loopa
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1500
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 11:57 am

The million dollar questions...

Post by loopa »

Why is it that so many pilots, especially low timers, have such sense of entitlement to start out with a flying job? What makes our job so different than others? Why is it that beginners in a different career field have to pay their dues, but yet for some reason, pilot's don't? What exactly is going through the mind of a 250 hour pilot thinking that working a non-airside job to prove work ethic is a disgrace to his/her status in the industry? the list of questions goes on....

Million Dollar Question: where is this general attitude developed from?

Is it from the flight schools? Is it from the lack of research by the students? Why is it that such attitudes are so broad across most college and "professional" schools, in comparison to a more humble, and down to earth environment such as a flying school/club?

Two Million Dollar Question: how does one go about promoting an industry where such attitudes aren't developed?

I'd like to get your thoughts on this one, make sure you don't bash your ego's now ... lol :lol:


Thanks in advance 8)
---------- ADS -----------
 
Randleman
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 317
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 8:01 pm

Re: The million dollar questions...

Post by Randleman »

For one million dollars:

I will start by saying I think just about every pilot has ego, so I am not stereotyping any groups here. But I think the ego really begins in flight school. I don't think flight schools necessarily promote egoistic attitudes, but I think it naturally happens. The truth is, aviation is, in my mind, one of the greatest career paths possible (now, the aviation industry is a completely different story, but let's not go there :P). So when I went to flight school, as I came through my private training, especially being as young as I was, I developed an attitude of "I can do this, and most others can't!" And thus, ego was created. Of course, entering the real world, and beginning to work in the industry changes your attitude completely. I am not going to blame a flight school for this, as they did nothing to promote having "attitude", but they also don't tell you not to. I think that's where it begins, whether promoted or not, in flight school. This will lead into my next poin...

For two million dollars:

Of course, the question becomes "how do we teach pilots not to have this ego?" I think that it's not possible to "teach" them this, but rather to model it and lead by example. I don't think you can "force" answers to issues like this on people, bur rather inspire others by being an example-look at people like Ghandi for example.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Randleman
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 317
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 8:01 pm

Re: The million dollar questions...

Post by Randleman »

P.S. great post Loopa! If you are ever in YWG, I'll buy you a beer! :partyman:
---------- ADS -----------
 
moocow
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 697
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 10:36 pm

Re: The million dollar questions...

Post by moocow »

OK I'll take a stab at this.

1. Ego. Let's face it, pilots do have some kind of ego since OMFGBBQ we know how to fly. Also, no one wants to work at worst than minimum wage after throwing a large amount of money in their flight training.

2. Questionable industry practice. We all know someone that got screwed by "dangler" type company. Sorry but loyalty and ethics goes both ways. Kind of difficult to work hard when the company shows no intention of promoting you. Don't think so? Go read some research paper on Organization Behaviours and Human Resource. Just because the owner or management work their way through the industry doesn't mean they know how to motivate and/or manage people.

3. Low correlation between entry position and eventual position. Working as rampie do not add experience toward operating an aircraft. Even with 250 hours, one should know how weight and balance work. Knowledge exchange shouldn't solely rely on mentoring from flight crews alone. Rampie is not an apprenticeship in piloting.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Randleman
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 317
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 8:01 pm

Re: The million dollar questions...

Post by Randleman »

moocow wrote:OK I'll take a stab at this.

1. Ego. Let's face it, pilots do have some kind of ego since OMFGBBQ we know how to fly. Also, no one wants to work at worst than minimum wage after throwing a large amount of money in their flight training.
No, but tell me how many pilots (other than some flight instructors) make less than someone who makes minimum wage? A minimum wage is 16 000 dollars a year pal! I know VERY FEW pilots in Canada who make less than 16 000 dollars a year. This "pilots make less than minimum wage/flipping burgers" s*** is getting very old and ridiculous. Yes, pilots may not make the most money, but they certainly make more than minimum wage. Get over yourself people!
moocow wrote: Rampie is not an apprenticeship in piloting.
Well no, you are right in that aspect, but ramp-ing is more about filling a position while waiting for a flight position...what else are you going to do if no pilot positions are available? It's better than nothing!
---------- ADS -----------
 
loopa
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1500
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 11:57 am

Re: The million dollar questions...

Post by loopa »

I actually think that there's quite a lot of things to be learned on the ramp that can apply to one's future as a successful pilot. There's a saying where we learn by doing. As much as a student may have learned by reading about operational handling of aircraft, doing the handling itself is a different story. So I can't quite exactly agree with you when you say that working the ramp has no benefits to the pilot's future. I think that it does because it amazes me how many people there are out there that call them selves pilot's, who if given a credit card and instructions to fuel a plane, would have 20 beats added to their hearts, a sense of nervousness, and in ability to properly fuel their planes. Oh, and as a alert, operational handling of the aircraft doesn't stop as soon as you step into that turbo prop job. In fact, flying for most 703/704 operators, you will on occasion fly into airports where the handling of the aircraft is solely the responsibility of you, the pilot.

I think almost every rampie will agree that being on the ramp has taught them so much, and built them so much respect for the people who service the aircraft, because only somebody who has experienced it truly knows how tough of a job it really can be.

My question to you moocow, when an accountant is hired right from university, is he or she put straight into a role in controlling major corporate taxes? Most definitely not. They are started as a bookkeeper, and on occasion income tax duties. How will such duties help them with the so called "big-boy" duties? Like anything, it will build the basic foundation for taxation, number adjustments, and an insight of the whole business. Gradually as experience in acquired, they move to higher, and higher posts. Same thing with flying, you work the ground, learn heck of a lot, apply it to your flying one by one. You will quickly come to learn the uniqueness of many aircraft such as what a real walk around really consists of, or how much de-icing is necessary for the removal of ice, snow, frost, or what a certain aircraft is famous for, the list goes on... When you're up there flying the flight levels, you'll have all this experience under your belt, not just in flying, but also in operational awareness which is something that operators are always looking for. You want somebody flying your planes who cares about the airplane and knows how to handle it.

Obviously if you can score a flying job, take it, but especially for all the low timers, don't turn down jobs because you're going to work the ground for a period of time. It will teach you things you never thought were possible.

I just think that the term "true pilot" has more traits to it than the basic flight training syllabus that students are faced with. I personally think that the million dollar answer is that people in this day and age, have a huge lack of curiosity in what they do. It seems that more and more, people settle for the bare minimums, and don't get out there to explore their curiosity. How many of you students in flight training have actually taken 1 hour out of your 200 hour commercial course, to go to the AME's office, and have a chat with them? or hang out with the fueling guy at the airport and have him take you out on a few fuelings? or show interest in the rampie's job and have him teach you a thing or two about his job? See it's traits like this that will provide you with a humbling experience, get you out of that egoistic mindset, and set's you apart from that other 250 hour guy applying for the same job that you're trying to call your first. Try to learn all there is in your field, even the duties that will get your hands dirty. It will pay off! If you think that every guy sitting there controlling the MCP at 400 feet just got there with the chance of luck, you need a big reality check! While some are lucky, most that are up there flying you from Vancouver to Toronto have had their hands dirty, and they know a thing or two more than their flying duties.

I have a hard time believing that companies are looking for a know-it-all, because if they can find somebody who truly has a great character, a good attitude, curiosity in what they do, and endure a humbling attitude, the company can train that pilot into becoming what ever type of pilot they need him/her to be - making all the know-it-all wannabe's questioning them selves, why is it that this company won't hire me... I got the time... or I have the degree... or I have the PPC... or I have this... I have that... you get the picture. A very good friend of mine probably has every type rating in the book, flown for most of the carriers there are out there, and has 18 000 hours of PIC time alone. When you talk to him, you feel no difference than talking to a 250 hour pilot... in fact, he's more humble than some of the noobs I've seen out there. If you need to fuel the airplane, he's ahead of you, on his way to the self serve tanks to do it. Tell me something, would you respect this guy or what? I know I would. Try to be that guy who after so many years of flying, is still excited to do the dirty work cause as long as there are class acts like him around, there will be the so-called, know it alls questioning their progress which eventually leads to their bitterness and resignation from the industry. What ever happened to that dream you had when you were 5, where you were soaring the skies? Don't get lost in your own ego people!

But what do I know right? Cause I'm still a low timer... still learning ... still excited every time I go to work. This post is just an insight that I'm experiencing based on many so-to-speak, "aviators" that I run into on a daily basis. Some true aviators, some, who are in for a rough road.

But to each his/her own ... Good luck to everybody looking for that first flying job!

Good Night 8)
---------- ADS -----------
 
moocow
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 697
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 10:36 pm

Re: The million dollar questions...

Post by moocow »

Thanks for pointing out about working in 703/704 operation. I think most people, including myself, do not make that connection at first.
---------- ADS -----------
 
niss
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 6745
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 8:54 pm
Location: I'm a CPL trapped in a PPL's Body.
Contact:

Re: The million dollar questions...

Post by niss »

I think it has to do with the fact that that Pilots young and old can't get their head out of the 50s and 60s mentality when flying was not the norm, it was a luxury, and no FA would dare call it sexual assault, it was a privilege.

We still view ourselves as Gods among men as we are officially sanctioned by the government to do what every boy dreamed of up until he got his first boner and girls were no longer icky.

Collectively we are mentally stuck in the golden age of aviation when it took 3 middle aged men in order to not kill 80 people using an aircraft that less technology that is in my ipod and my cell phone (I don't have an iPhone).

No matter what we fly or how long we have been doing it we all use that as a yard stick, and we all mentally compare ourselves to that situation. Those guys were pilots, and I am a pilot, therefor, I do what those guys did.

What we do is magical and amazing, the problem is, it is generally in our own minds and not really in the rest of society.

That is why no one will compare this to any other job. Because paying dues is for schmucks like Doctors and Lawyers. Those guys only shape society and save lives. We get people and stuff from point A to point B, and if point B happens to be our actual destination and no one dies, all the much better.

That is why it is insulting to ask a pilot sling luggage, or fill airplanes, because that suitcase he just threw through the air? That should be an aircraft at his hands, that filler neck he just stuck the gas pump into, that should be a flight attendant at his............you know.

Pilots........doing in the air what people have been doing on the ground for thousands of years, since 1903.
---------- ADS -----------
 
She’s built like a Steakhouse, but she handles like a Bistro.

Let's kick the tires, and light the fires.... SHIT! FIRE! EMERGENCY CHECKLIST!
User avatar
modi13
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 394
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 12:49 pm

Re: The million dollar questions...

Post by modi13 »

I think a big part of the problem is the approach of those who are trying to entice new pilots to join the industry, whether that be flight schools, journalists, etc. Their methodology is usually to highlight the benefits, lifestyle and wages of the top echelon of pilots, as well as the "pilot shortage", which creates the idea that immediately after flight school we all go straight to a major. I don't think it's being intentionally dishonest, just leaving out the part in the middle that requires years of hard work, long hours and low pay, whether that's ramping, instructing, or flying a 185 for a lodge. Take AMEs for instance: no one who becomes a mechanic is under the impression that they'll be able to bypass their apprenticeship. We just need to educated commercial candidates on the reality of the industry, preferably before they drop any cash on training, so they know what to expect before they finish their licence. Those with egos and an inherent sense of entitlement will still believe enty-level jobs are beneath them, but that's how it is in any industry; everyone else will have a realistic sense of the industry and the process required to work their way up the ladder.
---------- ADS -----------
 
. ._
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 7374
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 5:50 pm
Location: Cowering in my little room because the Water Cooler is locked.
Contact:

Re: The million dollar questions...

Post by . ._ »

Maverick never worked on the ramp. Neither should I.

Image

-istp :P
---------- ADS -----------
 
niss
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 6745
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 8:54 pm
Location: I'm a CPL trapped in a PPL's Body.
Contact:

Re: The million dollar questions...

Post by niss »

Exactly,

If perhaps they re release Top Gun where Kelly McGillis:
Image

F***s this guy:

Image

Things might change.
---------- ADS -----------
 
She’s built like a Steakhouse, but she handles like a Bistro.

Let's kick the tires, and light the fires.... SHIT! FIRE! EMERGENCY CHECKLIST!
ywgflyboy
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 440
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 7:48 am

Re: The million dollar questions...

Post by ywgflyboy »

I hope my odds at this are better than my failure to nab a lotto max win the last two weeks......

1) The flight schools. It is quite evident how good of a job they do convincing people of the glory of aviation considering all the schools I am familiar with continues to thrive through the recession. Now if that doesn't make red lights go off in perspective students brains, then the fault lays on them. I can not honestly say at any point I thought this would be a good industry for jobs. "Shortage of pilots" blah blah blah. Explain to me how someone can believe this with thousands of laid off pilots in every country around the world. Add that too the fact we keep pumping out more "Commercial Pilots". Ultimately, if you make it through all of your training and haven't caught on that it is nearly impossible to land a flying job out of training, you are walking with your eyes closed.

Of course, we also get fancy diagrams that help to point us in the right direction after our introductory flight... Image (source: Harv's Air)

2) I think there is enough promoting as there can be. We have this wonderful thing called Google that provides a world of information to everyone. I am not sure about everyone else, but I would like to know the industry before I drop 45k on training that I should know gets me nothing right away.

To clarify. I am not bitter towards the industry. I (along with someone else in this thread) have just finished my training, have nabbed a job at reputable regional airline working on the ground where I have learned huge amounts of essential ops information that I would have not known without this experience. Movement is fast now and I have nothing to complain about.

Chief pilots/hr departments get tremendous amounts of emails/pop ins every day they show up for work by people with their new CPL wanting a job. Put yourself in their shoes. I'd be pulling my hair out.

This is all about building relationships and connections. If you don't want to instruct or are on bad terms with your CFI, get a job working with an airline and get to know everyone and move on up from there. You will stand out a million times more than those 50 others who dropped in yesterday with their resume and cheap Moores suite.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Meatservo
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2578
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 11:07 pm
Location: Negative sequencial vortex

Re: The million dollar questions...

Post by Meatservo »

I haven't noticed a lot of "attitude" with the guys at my job. I suppose I have a bit of an "attitude". For some people it appears when they finally get sick of being taken advantage of and start to push back. Not so much an "I'm the greatest" attitude as a "no, I think I'll have one day off this week, someone else can clean the goddamn seatbacks and nail tyres to the dock. I'm going home" attitude. This makes some employers angry and then they start barking about "attitude".
---------- ADS -----------
 
If I'd known I was going to live this long, I'd have taken better care of myself
TG
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2102
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2004 11:32 am
Location: Around

Re: The million dollar questions...

Post by TG »

loopa wrote:I actually think that there's quite a lot of things to be learned on the ramp that can apply to one's future as a successful pilot....
I think that it does because it amazes me how many people there are out there that call them selves pilot's, who if given a credit card and instructions to fuel a plane, would have 20 beats added to their hearts, a sense of nervousness, and in ability to properly fuel their planes.
It's called daily life in society.
The things you praise as being a ramp worker is stuff that you can learn doing all kind of summer jobs as a teenager or things that your mom and dad should have teach you.
If one cannot handle a credit card he still have a lot to learn outside aviation not mentioning the fact that every one should be able to fuel his aircraft with no issues right from the flying school.
And it's not only about rampies, same thing goes with dispatchers or someone working a check in counter, etc...
Don't call this apprenticeship but just a job waiting for things to open up.

For civilians, "apprenticeship" in piloting would be building hours flying skydiver doing fire patrol, traffic watch, tourist city tours, etc...
I don't know, fill the blank. In Europe they would call it "paying your QT, Qualification on type" Fortunately we are not there yet. Just don't add instructing into the list as that is where your problem really is.

Flying instruction...

I don't recall an industry were apprentices are used to "teach" all the ropes of a work!
---------- ADS -----------
 
Legacy
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 539
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 9:05 pm

Re: The million dollar questions...

Post by Legacy »

loopa wrote:Why is it that so many pilots, especially low timers, have such sense of entitlement to start out with a flying job? What makes our job so different than others? Why is it that beginners in a different career field have to pay their dues, but yet for some reason, pilot's don't?
Which jobs are you referring to when you say "pay their dues". Just to say "beginners in a different career field have to pay their dues" doesn't hold merit. For every job that "pays their dues" I can name 20 that don't. Besides why should ANY job out their have to pay their dues. It should be 1) you get trained for a job, then 2) you do the job you were trained to do. Not a tough concept.
---------- ADS -----------
 
whipline
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 616
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 9:40 am

Re: The million dollar questions...

Post by whipline »

Three million dollar question. Did anyone in here spent thousands on ratings plus several years of their life to load airplanes? Want a ramp person, hire a ramp person. Want a pilot, hire a pilot. How about stoping the practice of using fellow aviators?

The only attitude I see in this thread is a sense of entitlement, and its not coming from the 200hr crowd.
---------- ADS -----------
 
loopa
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1500
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 11:57 am

Re: The million dollar questions...

Post by loopa »

Which jobs are you referring to when you say "pay their dues". Just to say "beginners in a different career field have to pay their dues" doesn't hold merit. For every job that "pays their dues" I can name 20 that don't. Besides why should ANY job out their have to pay their dues. It should be 1) you get trained for a job, then 2) you do the job you were trained to do. Not a tough concept.
This is why :wink:
I just think that the term "true pilot" has more traits to it than the basic flight training syllabus that students are faced with. I personally think that the million dollar answer is that people in this day and age, have a huge lack of curiosity in what they do. It seems that more and more, people settle for the bare minimums, and don't get out there to explore their curiosity. How many of you students in flight training have actually taken 1 hour out of your 200 hour commercial course, to go to the AME's office, and have a chat with them? or hang out with the fueling guy at the airport and have him take you out on a few fuelings? or show interest in the rampie's job and have him teach you a thing or two about his job? See it's traits like this that will provide you with a humbling experience, get you out of that egoistic mindset, and set's you apart from that other 250 hour guy applying for the same job that you're trying to call your first. Try to learn all there is in your field, even the duties that will get your hands dirty. It will pay off! If you think that every guy sitting there controlling the MCP at 400 feet just got there with the chance of luck, you need a big reality check! While some are lucky, most that are up there flying you from Vancouver to Toronto have had their hands dirty, and they know a thing or two more than their flying duties.

I have a hard time believing that companies are looking for a know-it-all, because if they can find somebody who truly has a great character, a good attitude, curiosity in what they do, and endure a humbling attitude, the company can train that pilot into becoming what ever type of pilot they need him/her to be - making all the know-it-all wannabe's questioning them selves, why is it that this company won't hire me... I got the time... or I have the degree... or I have the PPC... or I have this... I have that... you get the picture. A very good friend of mine probably has every type rating in the book, flown for most of the carriers there are out there, and has 18 000 hours of PIC time alone. When you talk to him, you feel no difference than talking to a 250 hour pilot... in fact, he's more humble than some of the noobs I've seen out there. If you need to fuel the airplane, he's ahead of you, on his way to the self serve tanks to do it. Tell me something, would you respect this guy or what? I know I would. Try to be that guy who after so many years of flying, is still excited to do the dirty work cause as long as there are class acts like him around, there will be the so-called, know it alls questioning their progress which eventually leads to their bitterness and resignation from the industry. What ever happened to that dream you had when you were 5, where you were soaring the skies? Don't get lost in your own ego people!
Even if you don't work the ramp in your career, student's shouldn't be so ignorant about the other aviation related jobs. Because if this job is, as most of you say, the icing on top of the cake, as the commander of the "top" job, knowing a thing or two about those jobs will certainly develop a much better, understanding, humble, and relax attitude towards flying. Like the development of a pyramid - if you want the pyramid to last, build a strong base first. In fact, being familiar with the other aviation related jobs will make you appreciate your job that much more. That is if you're a Pilot. Same thing if you're pursuing an AME job. It will allow you to apply those skills to your problem solving abilities.

I woke up this morning and had 7 private messages, all very positive. One that stood out was a bombardier captain that flew a corporate jet to France, ended up having the lavatories not working. The problem was so severe that they had to fly out a bombardier mechanic to fix the issue. But, having experience with the same kind of issue from his ramp days, he knew exactly what to do, saved the company a ton of money from having to fly somebody out from Canada, and continued on with no problems. He got his hands dirty, now tell me, which of you 250 hour with a business degree in aviation administration would even volunteer to do such a thing? Wait, that may leave stains on your rayban's and ties. Haha jokes... I'm not attacking you guys. I have run into some very good guys from the college programs. But trying to make a point that was mentioned earlier. The problem has a lot to do with how some flight schools promote flying. They essentially confirm the idea that flying is still like 60 years ago where it's a luxurious privilege with all the nice assets attached to it. They pull people into flight training, and literally lure them into pursuing a goal that will open up so many jobs for them once their training is done. I don't blame the students at this point, because it seems that they have actually found a career that is quite "easy" to make it to the top without much work. Who wouldn't settle for that right?
---------- ADS -----------
 
ywgflyboy
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 440
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 7:48 am

Re: The million dollar questions...

Post by ywgflyboy »

whipline wrote:Three million dollar question. Did anyone in here spent thousands on ratings plus several years of their life to load airplanes? Want a ramp person, hire a ramp person. Want a pilot, hire a pilot. How about stoping the practice of using fellow aviators?
Our entire world is based on capitalism and supply vs demand. It sucks yes, but this can and will never change. You can not guarantee a job for everyone who walks out of their CPL exam with their new endorsement to fly for reward. You are faced with two options (1)continue just being a number with 200 hours applying pointlessly over and over again to a company who probably can not even insure you to be a pilot, or (2)prove your worth and suck it up for 6 months - 1 year and give yourself a name with someone. This isn't nursing or medicine where everyone who gets out is guaranteed a position, not to mention has proven themselves to earn their designation(sorry, I did actually learn to spin a plane all by myself in my CPL compared to the PPL).

Scenario. Would you hire an 18 year old who showed up at your doorstep with his CPL and 212 hours to fly your aircraft? I wouldn't.

As I have said in a previous post, you have absolutely no idea what commercial ops are like when you get your CPL.

This isn't a perfect world. Sure we would have all LOVED to get a job with 200 hours but the fact is, that is not realistic anymore and everyone who starts flying should do themselves a favor and look into it. None of us here have the power to change an entire industry unless you have billions of dollars and get to sleep around with John Baird.
---------- ADS -----------
 
iflyforpie
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 8132
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:25 pm
Location: Winterfell...

Re: The million dollar questions...

Post by iflyforpie »

In my other occupation (AME) I did have to pay my dues, but it was doing what AMEs do. In fact, it's a requirement to fill out 70% of your logbook of required tasks before you get a license. So sure, I got really friendly with a sealant gun, angle grinder, screw gun, and dozens of other menial tasks that licensed guys wouldn't touch with a ten-foot-pole when there are apprenti around, but I still got my logbook filled doing things like engine changes, gear swings, control rigging, and troubleshooting.

But here I am, the only AME at this AMO, and I have to do everything. Degreasing engines, cleaning spark plugs, greasing landing gear, sweeping the floor, ordering parts, fixing the lawnmower, on it goes. But I still maintain aircraft.

Here I am as a pilot too, washing planes, fueling planes, moving planes, scrubbing toilets, mowing grass. But I still fly.

I think the problems being a pilot are:

1) The huge number of pilots there are in comparison to the number of openings.

2) The huge hurry everybody is in to get to the 'coolest' flying there is available.

Number 1 creates the perfect opportunity for operators to acquire cheap labor. Number 2 is pilots creating problems for themselves and other pilots by forcing bonds allowing larger companies to 'dangle the carrot'.

To me, the industry needs to change in several ways. I think that a 200hr wonder should be able to fly low performance piston singles right out of flight school on revenue flights (my first job was on a Cherokee SIX with 200 and change). I don't think a 250 hour with an IATRA should be right seating it after six months to a year on the ramp with no Commercial PIC experience.

I think that the expectation should be that after you get your licenses, you should be able to use them. To me this isn't an ego thing, it is a I-gave-up-two-years-and-$50K-of-my-cash-to-fly-for-a-living thing. Even if you do ground duties (which I totally agree with), you should be able to fly or at least have a guaranteed seat after a certain amount of time.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Geez did I say that....? Or just think it....?
User avatar
flying4dollars
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 8:56 am

Re: The million dollar questions...

Post by flying4dollars »

I don't have a problem with a guy working the ramp to gain some experience in a 703/704 operation before he gets into an airplane with the company who hires him. What I don't agree with is keeping him on the ramp for up to 2 and sometimes 3 years before letting him fly. Some companies advertise that this is to determine the candidates work ethic. Really, if you need 2-3 years to figure it out, then there's something flawed in your hiring department. Sure, I agree people for the most part come across as golden childs during the interview and the first month or so of employment. But Realistically, 6 months to a year MAX, then get the kid a seat. Even if its a flight or 2 a month to start, give him something. I've seen first hand, people spend up to 3 years patiently waiting on the ramp, only to get a seat and bomb the training because he was rusty and asked to leave because the company couldn't properly prep the guy for a ride on a pretty advanced machine (leaving names and companies out). These said people were good people and good pilots, so to say they were terrible to begin with is wrong. How fair is that?

When I first got out of school, I believed I could get right into a seat somewhere. Yeah I thought I had some sense of entitlement, not a lot. I did my best to be humble about it. I worked the ramp to gain some experience, I bugged some operators and tried to get to know them by making visits every now and then. What I wasn't prepared to do was to leave home and go north. Scary world for me at the time. It took a while to figure it out, and after feeling depressed about not finding what I thought was supposed to be mine, I packed my bags and drove north. Things happened fast for me, so the system worked.

For me, it did start in flight school. During school we did a few prep courses and had a few guest speakers, who were pilots from other companies, come talk to us. Not one person told us about this whole "ramp experience". We were told to go find operators with reasonable sized starting machines (Navajos, 206's and even B100's), and bug them til they hired us. I think if we were coached a little better on how aviation really is today, before we go eventually learn it ourselves the hard way, we'd all be in a better position and maybe check any ego or sense of entitlement at the door. I dunno, my thoughts anyways.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Captain Obvious
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 11:55 am

Re: The million dollar questions...

Post by Captain Obvious »

I don't see it as a sense of entitlement, but rather expectations.

If I go to school for 4 years to become an accountant, then I wouldn't be happy being a receptionist for a year "to learn the ropes" and have the business "evaluate my work ethic". It doesn't happen in other professions. You don't see doctors emptying the bed pans and giving sponge baths to the patients when they graduate from med school.

As someone else said, if you want a rampie, hire a rampie. If you want a pilot, then hire a pilot. Most student pilots are serious about their training and have a very professional attitude towards flying. Despite some of the elitist attitudes on this board, recent CPL graduates are skilled and proficient at flying. They certainly need to gain experience, but that shouldn't involve shlepping around the ramp loading bags and answering phones. I have no problem doing this to help out, in fact it should be expected, to a certain extent, but I think an "apprentice" pilot should be mentored by the more experienced pilots and should be actively flying under close supervision.

As I said, I don't think I have a sense of entitlement at all. I've been on both sides of the fence (as a professional pilot in my 20's and as a business man for the last decade) and I shake my head at some of the crap professional pilots have to put up with. I'm hard-pressed to think of another profession that has so little respect for itself within its own industry.
---------- ADS -----------
 
ditar
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 407
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 1:09 pm
Location: This pale blue dot

Re: The million dollar questions...

Post by ditar »

The problem is that any monkey these days can get a pilot license. It doesn't take much real skill or knowledge anymore. All it takes is a lot of money from daddy, who told everyone his kid is going to be a pilot. This is why there are hundreds (thousands?) of low timers on the market, many who shouldn't be there to begin with. I've seen flight test reports from some of them that were appalling, the comments box full of items that should have been blatant failures. Releasing the mediocre performers like this into the workforce cheapens what the others have worked hard to excel at. Another example was when somebody asked me to help them study for their ATPL exams. They told me they didn't really care about understanding the material, they just wanted to pass the tests. I told this person he was on his own. Someone like that with an ATPL is an insult to those who worked hard to acquire those credentials.

Working the ramp is a good way to demonstrate your work ethic and to at least get exposure to an air operation while waiting for a flying position to open up, if that's what one chooses to do. I'm not against it, but I don't think it should be a prerequisite. Companies take advantage of it because they know there are plenty of people out there who fit the description in the first paragraph. But to consider it "apprenticing" for a pilot job is analogous to the aforementioned accountant paying his dues in a paper mill.

The number of licenses issued each year needs to be regulated, where only the top percentage of candidates ever obtain one. Sure, this will ruin many a person's dream, but from what I've seen that wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing. We're constantly making comparisons to doctors and lawyers on here. Lots of people flunk out of those areas of study after spending thousands of dollars and probably working a lot harder. Why should aviation be any different?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by ditar on Tue Jun 15, 2010 1:16 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Captain Obvious
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 11:55 am

Re: The million dollar questions...

Post by Captain Obvious »

The problem is that any monkey these days can get a pilot license. It doesn't take much real skill or knowledge anymore. All it takes is a lot of money from daddy, who told everyone his kid is going to be a pilot. This is why there are hundreds (thousands?) of low timers on the market, many who shouldn't be there to begin with. I've seen flight test reports from some of them that were appalling, the comments box full of items that should have been blatant failures.
Wow! I had no idea the system is this bad! Fifteen years ago, when I was teaching, students failed their ride when they didn't succeed at demonstrating an acceptable level of proficiency and knowledge.

I understand that there are some "bad apples" out there, with little interest/love for flying, but I think the vast majority of recent grads are capable of being qualified commercial pilots. I don't think it takes any less "real" skill or knowledge now than it used to, nor do I think "any monkey" can get a pilot license. I find it very discouraging when posters make blanket statements that put down the less experienced pilots out there.
---------- ADS -----------
 
ditar
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 407
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 1:09 pm
Location: This pale blue dot

Re: The million dollar questions...

Post by ditar »

Captain Obvious wrote: I understand that there are some "bad apples" out there, with little interest/love for flying, but I think the vast majority of recent grads are capable of being qualified commercial pilots. I don't think it takes any less "real" skill or knowledge now than it used to, nor do I think "any monkey" can get a pilot license. I find it very discouraging when posters make blanket statements that put down the less experienced pilots out there.
I didn't mean to imply that all low time pilots are monkeys. That is far from true. Like you say, the majority of them that I've met are very keen and have worked hard. What I meant is that the system permits many of the weak ones to get through, which is a problem.
---------- ADS -----------
 
IanC
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 9:20 am

Re: The million dollar questions...

Post by IanC »

As a newcomer to the industry, and currently participating in a program (algonquin) some of these posts make me cringe. I am in my mid 20's and had no illusions about the airline industry before I chose this path. I knew it was going to be hard work not only to get my license, but also to land any sort of job related to flying afterwards. I also don't see any of my fellow classmates with a sense of entitlement for landing a job after gaining their CPL. Personally when I am done I strongly believe that I will be joining the Canadian Forces. I also just want to fly for a living because I love flying. Some may get lost along the way, that just demonstrates that they weren't in it for the right reason anyways. Maybe I am to naive and am romanticizing it by stating this, but isn't that why you all wanted to be pilots, for the joy of flying?

If I were stuck on a ramp for 2 to 3 years and getting extremely little time, I would quit. It would have nothing to do with entitlement and everything to do with wanting to fly. I wouldn't care if I were flying fisherman to lakes in the middle of nowhere, or flying A320's all over the place, as long as I'm flying. Some of you old timers need to get over yourselves, you remind me of the saying "When I walked to school, it was uphill BOTH ways!" :roll:
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”