Personal Callsigns

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, I WAS Birddog

User avatar
sigmet77
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 335
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 6:28 am

Re: Personal Callsigns

Post by sigmet77 »

I've had a tonne and they were all given to me, not picked by me. Ruby, Sigment, Radar, Oreo, Horse, Shithead #2, and Brettsky.
---------- ADS -----------
 
fleet16b
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1195
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 11:49 am
Location: aerodrome of democracy

Re: Personal Callsigns

Post by fleet16b »

Hedley wrote:airplane :wink:

I am one of the most modest airshow pilots you will ever
meet. Stop laughing. Rather than put my name of the side
of the Pitts that I fly - which every other airshow pilot in
the world does - I am humble enough to put the airplane's
name on the side of it:

http://www.pittspecials.com/images/eric.jpg

"Pale Horse" - you can figure out what that means, all by
yourself. ,
From the bible :?: Goes something like this

"Behold the Pale Horse , for the rider is death and hell rides with him"
---------- ADS -----------
 
...isn't he the best pilot you've ever seen?....Yeah he is ....except when I'm shaving.........
User avatar
sigmet77
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 335
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 6:28 am

Re: Personal Callsigns

Post by sigmet77 »

Image

Or

Image
---------- ADS -----------
 
pelmet
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 7173
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 2:48 pm

Re: Personal Callsigns

Post by pelmet »

Anybody know the fighter pilot name that was used in the RCAF that was in the news today.
---------- ADS -----------
 
kbanner
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 5:23 pm
Location: earth

Re: Personal Callsigns

Post by kbanner »

I hope they are not spending a shit load of my tax dollars
dealing with this NON EVENT
---------- ADS -----------
 
pelmet
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 7173
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 2:48 pm

Re: Personal Callsigns

Post by pelmet »

---------- ADS -----------
 
Inverted2
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3704
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 7:46 am
Location: Turdistan

Re: Personal Callsigns

Post by Inverted2 »

The only acceptable call signs will be “Rainbow” or “Cupcake” now. Back in WWII they painted naked ladies on the nose. Wokeism has infected everything. Military is no exception.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Let’s Go Brandon
User avatar
Bede
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4433
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:52 am

Re: Personal Callsigns

Post by Bede »

The woke brigade seems to forget that the military's primary role is to kill people when needed. As long as they're being PC while doing it U guess....
---------- ADS -----------
 
mijbil
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 117
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 8:06 pm
Location: Rain Coast

Re: Personal Callsigns

Post by mijbil »

pelmet wrote: Mon Nov 28, 2022 1:28 pm Anybody know the fighter pilot name that was used in the RCAF that was in the news today.
FAWG = Fucked A Woman Gay.

Some of my other favourites were
"Custer" - = lost a bar fight to some Indians in Cold Lake
"BUG" = he had a really really ugly girlfriend. She had a Bent Up Grill.
"Guns" = she had no tits.

The others tend to be tamer.
---------- ADS -----------
 
DanWEC
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2324
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 1:05 pm
Location: 404

Re: Personal Callsigns

Post by DanWEC »

mijbil wrote: Mon Nov 28, 2022 8:59 pm FAWG = Fucked A Woman Gay.

Some of my other favourites were
"Custer" - = lost a bar fight to some Indians in Cold Lake
"BUG" = he had a really really ugly girlfriend. She had a Bent Up Grill.
"Guns" = she had no tits.

The others tend to be tamer.
Your callsign is something embarassing and sticks. It's tradition.
However, what I was told first hand was it was something about piss and that's was all, nothing about gender.

Either way, it's just terrific that our military officers can be defeated by feelings. They're supposed to be a special type of person that can do a job not many people can, in an regime that involves a unique skillset in order to keep the rest of us protected. The things that apply to your average citizen aren't supposed to apply to the military. That's the entire point. If they do, it doesn't work. Can't call HR because you're being shot at.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Liftdump
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 325
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 9:34 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Personal Callsigns

Post by Liftdump »

FLAPS
---------- ADS -----------
 
digits_
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5970
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:26 am

Re: Personal Callsigns

Post by digits_ »

DanWEC wrote: Mon Nov 28, 2022 9:11 pm
mijbil wrote: Mon Nov 28, 2022 8:59 pm FAWG = Fucked A Woman Gay.

Some of my other favourites were
"Custer" - = lost a bar fight to some Indians in Cold Lake
"BUG" = he had a really really ugly girlfriend. She had a Bent Up Grill.
"Guns" = she had no tits.

The others tend to be tamer.
Your callsign is something embarassing and sticks. It's tradition.
However, what I was told first hand was it was something about piss and that's was all, nothing about gender.

Either way, it's just terrific that our military officers can be defeated by feelings. They're supposed to be a special type of person that can do a job not many people can, in an regime that involves a unique skillset in order to keep the rest of us protected. The things that apply to your average citizen aren't supposed to apply to the military. That's the entire point. If they do, it doesn't work. Can't call HR because you're being shot at.
Right. Because the military does not care about public appearances or public opinion, nor about the current political climate...

Nor do they have set of rigid rules governing appearances such as uniforms....

PR and propaganda is getting more and more important in a Twitter and Facebook society. A story about how commander Pisspot receives a medal for saving the lives of pilots Hitler and BJ69 just doesn't generate the desired PR. It would look great on some honorary plaque or embroidered piece of textile though!
---------- ADS -----------
 
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
DanWEC
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2324
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 1:05 pm
Location: 404

Re: Personal Callsigns

Post by DanWEC »

Liftdump wrote: Mon Nov 28, 2022 9:32 pmFLAPS

FLAPS... that was it.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Liftdump
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 325
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 9:34 pm
Location: Earth

Re: Personal Callsigns

Post by Liftdump »

Right?
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
complexintentions
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2183
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 3:49 pm
Location: of my pants is unknown.

Re: Personal Callsigns

Post by complexintentions »

or...


apocalyspehorseman.jpg
apocalyspehorseman.jpg (296.07 KiB) Viewed 973 times
---------- ADS -----------
 
I’m still waiting for my white male privilege membership card. Must have gotten lost in the mail.
photofly
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 11306
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:47 pm
Location: Hangry and crankypated

Re: Personal Callsigns

Post by photofly »

Bede wrote: Mon Nov 28, 2022 8:13 pm The woke brigade seems to forget that the military's primary role is to kill people when needed. As long as they're being PC while doing it U guess....
To be fair, the Canadian military is more likely to be peace-keeping than fighting, but if you can establish that it makes you more likely to shoot down enemy airplanes if you have an offensive name, have at it.
---------- ADS -----------
 
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
User avatar
Bede
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4433
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:52 am

Re: Personal Callsigns

Post by Bede »

photofly wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 4:02 am To be fair, the Canadian military is more likely to be peace-keeping than fighting...
Maybe a few decades ago, but we've dropped bombs in Afghanistan & Libya, done covert missions in Iraq and are likely training Ukrainian troops in Ukraine or a neighbouring country.
photofly wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 4:02 am ...but if you can establish that it makes you more likely to shoot down enemy airplanes if you have an offensive name, have at it.
Offensive to whom? Why should anyone outside their squadron get a say? If it's not offensive to the subject, who are we to judge?
This guy: https://skiesmag.com/news/meet-jameel-j ... est-pilot/ callsign was Chocolate. He's one of North America's most decorated test pilots. Does the public at large get to tell him that he should find his own call sign offensive?
As an aside, I find the doctrine of collateral damage far more offensive than even the most vulgar of slurs. Why are our most fiercely contested battles over language?
---------- ADS -----------
 
digits_
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5970
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:26 am

Re: Personal Callsigns

Post by digits_ »

Bede wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 9:58 am Does the public at large get to tell him that he should find his own call sign offensive?
The article states that the military police intervened, and that the hearing won't be open to the public.

So why are you assuming the public cared?

Bede wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 9:58 am
Offensive to whom? Why should anyone outside their squadron get a say? If it's not offensive to the subject, who are we to judge?
What if the squadron decides they all want to wear sweatpants and Hawaiian t-shirts instead of uniforms? If it's not offensive to them, who are we to judge?


It's not about what the public thinks, it's about what the higher-ups will think the public will think.
---------- ADS -----------
 
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
photofly
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 11306
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:47 pm
Location: Hangry and crankypated

Re: Personal Callsigns

Post by photofly »

Bede wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 9:58 am
photofly wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 4:02 am To be fair, the Canadian military is more likely to be peace-keeping than fighting...
Maybe a few decades ago, but we've dropped bombs in Afghanistan & Libya, done covert missions in Iraq and are likely training Ukrainian troops in Ukraine or a neighbouring country.
photofly wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 4:02 am ...but if you can establish that it makes you more likely to shoot down enemy airplanes if you have an offensive name, have at it.
Offensive to whom?
The “how will it look when presented in the worst possible light in the press” test is quite a helpful gauge. Some controversial things are worth the energy you’d have to expend defending them. Some aren’t. In which category does having your colleagues call you “Asswipe” over the radio fall? Is this a hill to die on? (No pun intended.) Does it help you shoot down more planes? I’m willing to be schooled that it does, but if so, please make a case. The connection doesn’t seem obvious, to me.
Why are our most fiercely contested battles over language?
Because we’re blessed by having nothing else to fight over. That doesn’t mean it’s not worth thinking about.

Here’s another uniformed service with problems about “light banter”:
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/202 ... re-brigade
---------- ADS -----------
 
DId you hear the one about the jurisprudence fetishist? He got off on a technicality.
User avatar
Bede
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4433
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:52 am

Re: Personal Callsigns

Post by Bede »

Fair argument.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”