Winnipeg Jets - coming back?

This forum is for non aviation related topics, political debate, random thoughts, and everything else that just doesn't seem to fit in the normal forums. ALL FORUM RULES STILL APPLY.

Moderators: Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia

ikilledemilia
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 9:39 pm

Winnipeg Jets - coming back?

Post by ikilledemilia »

Looks like emotions are starting to stir with the debate...?
---------- ADS -----------
 
rigpiggy
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2964
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 7:17 pm
Location: west to east and west again

Re: Winnipeg Jets - coming back?

Post by rigpiggy »

to paraphrase gary bettman 'small case letters on purpose'

CANADA GO F@CK YOURSELVES
---------- ADS -----------
 
sky's the limit
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 4614
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 11:38 am
Location: Now where's the starter button on this thing???

Re: Winnipeg Jets - coming back?

Post by sky's the limit »

STEPHEN BRUNT
Bettman has no Plan B for Phoenix
STEPHEN BRUNT
Globe and Mail Update
Published Tuesday, Mar. 08, 2011 9:56PM EST


Hard to imagine that was really worth the airfare from New York to Phoenix.

Last night, NHL commissioner Gary Bettman, accompanied by his right-hand man, Bill Daly, completed what must have been a long and tiring day, addressing the press at the Jobing.com Arena in advance of the Phoenix Coyotes game against the Vancouver Canucks.

It is a safe bet that far more people were hanging on his words in Winnipeg – where they watched via a live Internet feed, at least until it crashed – than in the Valley of the Sun, where the Coyotes’ death throes have caught the imagination only of the team’s modest number of hardcore supporters, and of those who make a fetish of monitoring government waste.

The latter group, under the banner of the Goldwater Institute, received virtually all of the commissioner’s attention Tuesday.

In effect, he called them out. He said it was all their fault that the City of Glendale’s $116-million (U.S.) municipal bond issue, designed to underwrite the purchase of the Coyotes by Matthew Hulsizer, has so far been a miserable failure.

He implied in veiled fashion that the Institute’s motives might be less than pure. He came close to suggesting a conspiracy. He asked that it step away and stop messing around forthwith – and if it didn’t, well then the gloves will really come off, but only after the Coyotes are long gone.

For a group of ideologues and zealots, heretofore obscure to even many Arizonans, what a day, what a glorious day.

A commissioner comes almost the entire way across the country to single them out, to declare war, even as they are standing on what they firmly believe is a point of principle and a point of law.

And at the same time, that commissioner acknowledges there is nothing he can do to thaw the bond market, that there is no plan B, no alternate strategy. If Goldwater Institute simply holds its ground and stays the course – maybe for days, maybe for weeks, at most for a couple of months – it can kill the deal without even filing a lawsuit, because soon enough either Hulsizer (who certainly seemed to be losing his nerve Tuesday) or the NHL, or both, is going to have to fish or cut bait.

Now what would possibly compel the GWI to do otherwise – given it refused even to meet with Bettman, unless he agreed to a session open to the press and public? (… And wouldn’t that be something.)

A sudden loss of nerve? If it backed down now in the face of Glendale’s threatened lawsuit, the group might as well turn out the lights and turn Senator Barry’s picture to the wall.

A sudden change of heart? Did we mention that these are ideologues?

It would seem they have not much to lose here and plenty to gain in terms of their self-styled mission as the righteous enemies of big government.

Bettman looked weak Tuesday. He looked like someone who was playing his last card, trying to save face, trying to set up a future speech in which he can claim he did everything he could to keep the Coyotes right where they were.

But it isn’t public relations that ought to be his concern right now. The NHL’s loyal fans won’t suffer any angst if the Coyotes do indeed move back to Manitoba. A significant portion – surely a majority, given how the game’s popularity is strongest in traditional markets – would see it as the righting of a historical wrong.

The folks Bettman will have sway with his great powers of persuasion are his employers, the owners. He needs to come up with a story to explain how, following the Coyotes bankruptcy, the Jim Balsillie incursion, the season of league ownership, the accumulation of losses, and the revelation of Hulsizer as saviour thanks to that remarkably generous offer from Glendale, the whole thing could hit the rocks because a small band of true believers sent out a few letters and press releases, filed some access to information requests, wouldn’t promise not to sue, and refused to be bullied off their position.

It still looks like Winnipeg’s gain in the end, even if the governors will return there with gritted teeth.

But the whole thing, the whole process … it just doesn’t seem very big league, does it?
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Darkwing Duck
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 430
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:30 am

Re: Winnipeg Jets - coming back?

Post by Darkwing Duck »

My question is how come Brandon does not get an NHL team?

Because Winnipeg would want one too....
---------- ADS -----------
 
Kowalski: Sir, we may be out of fuel.
Skipper: What makes you think that?
Kowalski: We've lost engine one, and engine two is no longer on fire.
User avatar
I WAS Birddog
Rank Moderator
Rank Moderator
Posts: 378
Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 6:38 am
Location: dude...I just walk the earth.
Contact:

Re: Winnipeg Jets - coming back?

Post by I WAS Birddog »

Like everything in life...too much commodity. It's all watered down.
There are too many hockey teams in the NHL. The only glorious thing about Bettman's expansion program was Anahiem when they won the cup years ago. That's it.

Nashville, Columbus, Atlanta, Phoenix: FAIL

It figures being a Jets fan all my life and being cheerless for the last 13+ years before becoming a HABS fan...the possibility of the Jets flying again in Winnipeg has left me confused like Tom Hanks wife to be in the movie CAST AWAY where she remarried another after thinking he was dead.

;-)

GO JETS GO!!!
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by I WAS Birddog on Wed Mar 09, 2011 8:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
Before you plot your revenge on someone, make sure to dig two graveyard plots.
http://twitter.com/@iwasbirddog
Doc
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 9241
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 6:28 am

Re: Winnipeg Jets - coming back?

Post by Doc »

Gawd forbid that the NHL would actually place a franchise in a city where some fans might actually show up to games?
Some of you remember when the NHL had SIX teams. Now, let your imagination take you to a modern NHL with only the original 6. Think of the quality of the hockey when only 1 out of 6 players in today's league could even get a job i a 6 team league? Now that would be something to see. Every game would have the speed and quality of a 7th game of a Cup final. Teams couldn't afford to take fighting penalties, because they would be scored upon every time. Ah, REAL hockey!
Winnipeg could realistically support a franchise. So could Quebec City. So could Hamilton. Hockey doesn't belong where palm trees grow. It belongs in the land of ice and snow!
Don't even get me started on fighting in hockey. Street gangs on skates. Pure, simple and disgusting.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
The Old Fogducker
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1784
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 5:13 pm

Re: Winnipeg Jets - coming back?

Post by The Old Fogducker »

"Jets" return to YWG?

Well, maybe, but keep that cash sucking vacuum cleaner nozzle out of my personal pocketbook. I pay too much in the way of taxes already.

The Jets failed financially in YWG the first time around, so tell me why would this time would be any different?

When they were playing in Winnipeg, I seem to recall attendance was dismal, and people would say they didn't attend games because the arena wasn't nice enough .... as if the seats were made of concrete and had railroad spikes protruding through the seat backs. They wanted government to build them a new arena with tax money to support a private business.

Why should they do that?

The Old Curmudgeon ... errr, I mean ... The Old Fogducker
---------- ADS -----------
 
Doc
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 9241
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 6:28 am

Re: Winnipeg Jets - coming back?

Post by Doc »

The Old Fogducker wrote: tax money to support a private business.
Pretty much the same principal in reverse that allows ORNGE to operate. Using TAX dollars to COMPETE with private business!
---------- ADS -----------
 
Inverted2
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3937
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 7:46 am

Re: Winnipeg Jets - coming back?

Post by Inverted2 »

Once they get rid of that shyster of a commisioner Bettman, I could see some more Canadian teams coming back. 8)
---------- ADS -----------
 
DEI = Didn’t Earn It
User avatar
Nark
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2967
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: LA

Re: Winnipeg Jets - coming back?

Post by Nark »

Doc,
The quality of the game has evolved quite a bit since the Stompin Tom Conners days. I'd even wager that Gretzky wouldn't have the same amount of points, simply because today's game is different from the the mid 80/90's.

While I love to see the Canadian teams doing well, especially in the West, I don't think Canada can afford another team. Winnipeg doesn't have the population to support a team. It has plenty of cheer-leading, but no capital.

I love the cheap seats I got when I was in San Diego (Anaheim) and now in my new midwest city. Comparable seats in Columbus vs GM place are 4 times cheaper. I can afford to go to Canucks road games as a starving FO, but not their home games.

As a seriously devout fan, I can't afford to pay $100 for a nosebleed ticket just to put a team where otherwise it can't survive.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
Semper Fidelis
“De inimico non loquaris male, sed cogites"-
Do not wish death for your enemy, plan it.
Just another canuck
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2083
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 6:21 am
Location: The Lake.

Re: Winnipeg Jets - coming back?

Post by Just another canuck »

The Old Fogducker wrote:The Jets failed financially in YWG the first time around, so tell me why would this time would be any different?
The Minnesota North Stars failed the first time around too... and now they've been sold out for nearly a decade since their return.

And Winnipeg DID get a brand new arena... the Manitoba Moose play there. It was also built so that it could easily be upgraded to hold the amount of fans needed at the NHL level as well.

Winnipeg, IMO, could support a team... the city would be so happy with its return that it would never let it go again, just like what's happened in Minneapolis. I would also think Quebec City could get away with a return of the Nordiques too.

I can't believe anyone would look at this as a bad thing... another Canadian in the big show would be great in my books. :smt023
---------- ADS -----------
 
Twenty years from now you'll be more disappointed by the things you didn't do than by the things you did do.
So throw off the bowlines.
Sail away from the safe harbor.
Catch the trade winds in your sails.
Explore. Dream. Discover.
rigpiggy
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2964
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 7:17 pm
Location: west to east and west again

Re: Winnipeg Jets - coming back?

Post by rigpiggy »

kind of like threatening yeg to build them a new arena, yet edmonton is presently about tenth in attendance. my brother is in phoenix, hae says that the coyotes are more like a AAA baseball team inhow the games run with kids contests, tshirt cannon etc.... and he gets tix for about 17$/seat
---------- ADS -----------
 
Slats
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 478
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 7:35 pm

Re: Winnipeg Jets - coming back?

Post by Slats »

Nark wrote:Doc,
The quality of the game has evolved quite a bit since the Stompin Tom Conners days. I'd even wager that Gretzky wouldn't have the same amount of points, simply because today's game is different from the the mid 80/90's.
I agree 100%. Just don't tell the self-righteous nostalgic crowd that. They still believe old-timey hockey involved more skill, less violence and no fights. :roll:
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Beefitarian
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 6610
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 10:53 am
Location: A couple of meters away from others.

Re: Winnipeg Jets - coming back?

Post by Beefitarian »

Eddie Shore?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Doc
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 9241
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 6:28 am

Re: Winnipeg Jets - coming back?

Post by Doc »

Slats wrote:
Nark wrote:Doc,
The quality of the game has evolved quite a bit since the Stompin Tom Conners days. I'd even wager that Gretzky wouldn't have the same amount of points, simply because today's game is different from the the mid 80/90's.
I agree 100%. Just don't tell the self-righteous nostalgic crowd that. They still believe old-timey hockey involved more skill, less violence and no fights. :roll:
That was kind of my point. Imagine all that talent, in only SIX teams? An average team of today could literally slaughter the 1967 Stanley Cup winning Leafs! It's a different game. DUH! Bode Miller could wipe Jean Claude Killy's ass in a ski race! Not because Killy is damn near 80, but today's training and conditioning is heads and shoulders superior to what it was 40 years ago. Look at tennis. Most of the top women (of today) could beat the Rod Lavers, and Stan Smiths of the '60's! Hell, Serena Williams could BENCH PRESS Rod Laver.
---------- ADS -----------
 
rigpiggy
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2964
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 7:17 pm
Location: west to east and west again

Re: Winnipeg Jets - coming back?

Post by rigpiggy »

Toronto won the Cup? Not in living Memory.
---------- ADS -----------
 
ikilledemilia
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 9:39 pm

Re: Winnipeg Jets - coming back?

Post by ikilledemilia »

The Old Fogducker wrote:"Jets" return to YWG?

Well, maybe, but keep that cash sucking vacuum cleaner nozzle out of my personal pocketbook. I pay too much in the way of taxes already.

The Jets failed financially in YWG the first time around, so tell me why would this time would be any different?

There's a Facebook page recently created for that: "Winnipeg Jets, But Without Government Subsidies".
---------- ADS -----------
 
Moose47
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1348
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2008 2:45 pm
Location: Home of Canada's Air Defence

Re: Winnipeg Jets - coming back?

Post by Moose47 »

Test
---------- ADS -----------
 
ScudRunner
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3239
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 11:58 am

Re: Winnipeg Jets - coming back?

Post by ScudRunner »

Simple fact is Winnipeg and Manitoba for that matter are a quasi socialist state that live off the government teet. Manitoba has a very limited pool of corporate business that would support a National Hockey League Team. The population is not large enough or prosperous enough to keep a team in that city even with a decent sized stadium it would be doomed to fail.

I recall last year the premier of Manitoba spouting off about how the province had weathered the economic storm and was not effected by the world economic downturn. I ask what economy was there to ruin, go and look at all the high rises in Winnipeg they are all federal government building and MTS ? Sorry Winnipeg best of luck.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Sheila
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 486
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 4:56 pm

Re: Winnipeg Jets - coming back?

Post by Sheila »

Not anymore !

Darn rights the Winnipeg JETs are coming back. Why did they say tonight, " They have to make an announcement in the next couple of weeks.?"
---------- ADS -----------
 
Rowdy
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5166
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:26 pm
Location: On Borrowed Wings

Re: Winnipeg Jets - coming back?

Post by Rowdy »

bahahahahahahahaha

Winnipeg with a TEAM of any kind? you're joking right???
---------- ADS -----------
 
ScudRunner
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3239
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 11:58 am

Re: Winnipeg Jets - coming back?

Post by ScudRunner »

what idiot billionaire would do that when there are far better markets to put a team in.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Sheila
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 486
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 4:56 pm

Re: Winnipeg Jets - coming back?

Post by Sheila »

Winnipeg is supposed to get an nhl team because there is a market. It's Phoenix that is the dipshit market. Another hint for the corporations, was when they took that picture in downtown Winnipeg where tons of hockey fans filled the street, during the Olympics, and the Globe and Mail put it in the paper. When Canada won, I heard some guys tore off their shirts and ran in the snow banks, yelling and jumping.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by Sheila on Wed Apr 20, 2011 5:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ScudRunner
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3239
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 11:58 am

Re: Winnipeg Jets - coming back?

Post by ScudRunner »

Well if that guy who jumped in the snowbank would buy every corporate suite then your in luck!!
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by ScudRunner on Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
iflyforpie
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 8132
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:25 pm
Location: Winterfell...

Re: Winnipeg Jets - coming back?

Post by iflyforpie »

When I read this I thought maybe Bristol Aerospace was getting the F-35 maintenance contract. Seemed less far fetched to me... :?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Geez did I say that....? Or just think it....?
Locked

Return to “The Water Cooler”