Twr vs Gnd vis

This forum has been developed to discuss ATS related topics.

Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako

Post Reply
Captain X
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 474
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 1:47 pm

Twr vs Gnd vis

Post by Captain X »

Question:

An awos station is reporting say 1 sm which in this case would impose an approach ban for the airport, however tower reported vis is 1 3/4 sm and would not impose an approach ban.

Can the Tower vis override the awos vis?
---------- ADS -----------
 
kevenv
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 695
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 6:19 am

Re: Twr vs Gnd vis

Post by kevenv »

Manops 314.2
If an IFR aircraft is conducting an approach to
land or requests taxi authorization while any
airport RVR or the ground visibility is less than
the highest runway visibility minimum for the
airport as specified in the CFS, take the
following actions: (N)(R)

A. ensure that the aircraft has received all
current RVR and ground visibility
information; (N)(R

B. issue landing clearance or taxi authorization
if traffic and airport conditions permit; and
(R)

C. unless the operation is conducted in
accordance with an RVOP or LVOP
complete an aviation occurrence report,
once the aircraft has departed or taxied to its
destination on the airport. (N)(R)

The note for A states:

314.2 A. Note:
Ground visibility may be the prevailing visibility as
included in the current weather sequence or as
observed by an airport controller.


This what you're looking for?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Captain X
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 474
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 1:47 pm

Re: Twr vs Gnd vis

Post by Captain X »

Yes I think so. I have been inbound to an airport and the vis drops below the app ban via an awos/atis however we call up tower and they say the tower reported vis is above the approach ban limits while the awos is still reporting below the limit of the approach ban. I just wanted to know if I am in violation if we try an approach. We opted to go to our alternate to play it on the safe side.
---------- ADS -----------
 
kevenv
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 695
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 6:19 am

Re: Twr vs Gnd vis

Post by kevenv »

Too bad they didn't tell you about that note.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Captain X
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 474
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 1:47 pm

Re: Twr vs Gnd vis

Post by Captain X »

I wanted to ask but figured its not he right time to do so... and it was busy, no harm no foul
---------- ADS -----------
 
SII
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 172
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 7:21 pm

Re: Twr vs Gnd vis

Post by SII »

what tower has an AWOS?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Winning
kevenv
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 695
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 6:19 am

Re: Twr vs Gnd vis

Post by kevenv »

SII wrote:what tower has an AWOS?
CYFC for one
---------- ADS -----------
 
Woxof38
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 217
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 2:58 am
Location: Saskatchewan

Re: Twr vs Gnd vis

Post by Woxof38 »

CYXD CYMM
---------- ADS -----------
 
DeuceEng
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 35
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 1:14 pm

Re: Twr vs Gnd vis

Post by DeuceEng »

CYKF CYTZ
---------- ADS -----------
 
FaStAeRo
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 5:16 pm

Re: Twr vs Gnd vis

Post by FaStAeRo »

CYHU
---------- ADS -----------
 
Woxof38
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 217
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 2:58 am
Location: Saskatchewan

Re: Twr vs Gnd vis

Post by Woxof38 »

I think CYXS
---------- ADS -----------
 
SII
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 172
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 7:21 pm

Re: Twr vs Gnd vis

Post by SII »

Sorry guys, I can't really respond to you without names of airdromes. As for YMM isn't that a fictishious tower that tried to kill a 1900 crew. I thought they were going to kibosh the YMM virtual tower after that incedent
---------- ADS -----------
 
Winning
wannabepilot
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 6:05 pm

Re: Twr vs Gnd vis

Post by wannabepilot »

SII: CYMM is a real tower, with real live controllers, not "fictishious" as you say. The virtual, or remote tower technology was researched, but found to be not ready for application; the decision to not use it had nothing to do with any incident. No one at CYMM FSS or Tower (and I would go so far as to say in all of Nav Canada, or Transport Canada back in the day) has ever, to the best of my knowledge, tried to kill anyone. I'm also sure that 99.9% of all pilots who've ever had an accident or incident never tried to kill anyone either. I realize it was an off the cuff remark, but I take offense at the notion that anyone on either side of the radio would be so careless with the lives and property they're entrusted with.
---------- ADS -----------
 
W0XOF
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 258
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 4:30 pm

Re: Twr vs Gnd vis

Post by W0XOF »

CYLW is another with AWOS

Also, good post by wannabepilot.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Read you 2 by 2. Too loud and too often!
Post Reply

Return to “ATS Question Forum”