BC Plane Crash - Nakusp

Topics related to accidents, incidents & over due aircraft should be placed in this forum.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, North Shore

cptn2016
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 155
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 12:15 pm

BC Plane Crash - Nakusp

Post by cptn2016 »

http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/dead+ ... story.html

One dead and one taken to hospital. Condolences to the families.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Last edited by cptn2016 on Wed Aug 24, 2011 1:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
kevind
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 304
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 1:09 pm

Re: BC Plane Crash - Kakusp

Post by kevind »

Kakusp? Did they mean Nakusp? Did the media get it wrong again?
---------- ADS -----------
 
kevind
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 304
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 1:09 pm

Re: BC Plane Crash - Kakusp

Post by kevind »

At least the local paper knows where they are

http://www.bclocalnews.com/kootenay_roc ... 32123.html
---------- ADS -----------
 
crazy_aviator
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 917
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 10:13 am

Re: BC Plane Crash - Nakusp

Post by crazy_aviator »

Unfortunately, it looks like a glassy water landing. With a lake that large, you need to basically do an instrument approach from 200 feet, 250-300 fpm down, perfect attitude and adjust power to maintain descent rate, at touchdown , power off and controls back a known amount for the A/C. Its an easy procedure once learned.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Cat Driver
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 18921
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:31 pm

Re: BC Plane Crash - Nakusp

Post by Cat Driver »

I wonder how many float plane pilots there are out there who never saw glassy water doing their sea plane rating?
---------- ADS -----------
 
The hardest thing about flying is knowing when to say no


After over a half a century of flying no one ever died because of my decision not to fly.
WileyCoyote
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 122
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 9:29 pm
Location: Between a rock and a grain field...

Re: BC Plane Crash - Nakusp

Post by WileyCoyote »

I was lucky I guess, the only thing I wasn't able to do was sailing during my 7 hour...
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
MUSICMAAN
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 176
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 7:26 pm
Location: Dark side of the moon

Re: BC Plane Crash - Nakusp

Post by MUSICMAAN »

crazy_aviator wrote:Unfortunately, it looks like a glassy water landing. With a lake that large, you need to basically do an instrument approach from 200 feet, 250-300 fpm down, perfect attitude and adjust power to maintain descent rate, at touchdown , power off and controls back a known amount for the A/C. Its an easy procedure once learned.

If I may speak up only for the purpose ofconstructive criticizim, you really don't want any more than 150 fpm descent rate for a glassy water approach

MM
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Nordo
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 85
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 1:47 pm

Re: BC Plane Crash - Nakusp

Post by Nordo »

Cat Driver wrote:I wonder how many float plane pilots there are out there who never saw glassy water doing their sea plane rating?
I would imagine there are a ton of guys out there who have not seen glass. I would even bet there are a few who have maybe even seen a season without seeing it. I did mine in two days and never saw glass once. The first time I saw glass was working. I had a lake the size of Detroit and I followed the shore as long as I could then set up and waited. It was tense, I remember that. I dropped off my cargo and when my boss flew in after me in the second plane, I told him I was going out to do circuits, and I did four or five more. Thats how I learned......not ideal. But I have to dissagree with crazy; 300 fpm is way too fast for glass. 150 is ideal and 200 is max.

My condolences to the family and the friends for the sudden loss.
---------- ADS -----------
 
I fly because it releases my mind from the tyrony of petty things.
robertsailor1
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 643
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 6:05 pm

Re: BC Plane Crash - Nakusp

Post by robertsailor1 »

If you have an engine failure at lower altitude I can understand how a pilot could lose it. With no engine its not so easy to set up 150-200 fpm decent when your low. I've done many glassy water landings and its not that hard with power but I never tried one with a simulated engine failure from low altitude...don't think that bit of practice would be that high on my to do list.
---------- ADS -----------
 
PanEuropean
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 390
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 3:03 pm
Location: Toronto, Canada

Re: BC Plane Crash - Nakusp

Post by PanEuropean »

Is a radar altimeter (in good working order) a dependable source of height above the water for the purpose of making a glassy water landing?

Michael
---------- ADS -----------
 
snoopy
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1118
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 6:19 pm
Location: The Dog House

Re: BC Plane Crash - Nakusp

Post by snoopy »

Unless you have lots of altitude when the engine quits, the last thing you will be worried about is glassy water. When it happened to me in a C-185 I was in a base turn setting up for a long shallow glassy final approach. "Oh shit - I guess we're landing" is what I said to my passenger, after that you fly it down. Thankfully I got lucky and surprised myself with a smooth landing - I've often thought about the potential consequences if things hadn't turned out so well.

Does anyone know if this was a commercial flight?

Kirsten B.
---------- ADS -----------
 
“Never interrupt someone doing something you said couldn’t be done.” Amelia Earhart
robertsailor1
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 643
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 6:05 pm

Re: BC Plane Crash - Nakusp

Post by robertsailor1 »

Simple VSI works fine
---------- ADS -----------
 
cncpc
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1715
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 10:17 am

Re: BC Plane Crash - Nakusp

Post by cncpc »

snoopy wrote:Unless you have lots of altitude when the engine quits, the last thing you will be worried about is glassy water. When it happened to me in a C-185 I was in a base turn setting up for a long shallow glassy final approach. "Oh shit - I guess we're landing" is what I said to my passenger, after that you fly it down. Thankfully I got lucky and surprised myself with a smooth landing - I've often thought about the potential consequences if things hadn't turned out so well.

Does anyone know if this was a commercial flight?

Kirsten B.
No it wasn't, Kirsten. Something with square wingtips, square tail.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Good judgment comes from experience. Experience often comes from bad judgment.
crazy_aviator
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 917
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 10:13 am

Re: BC Plane Crash - Nakusp

Post by crazy_aviator »

Perhaps its been too long since i taught glassy water landings ! Sorry if i have led anyone astray. The descent rate that is picked should allow the plane to land within the confines of the lake while also providing a FIRM touchdown. Since ground effect will cushion the descent rate, you wont see 150 FPM as the plane enters ground effect, if you maintained 150 fpm on the approach.
---------- ADS -----------
 
cncpc
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1715
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 10:17 am

Re: BC Plane Crash - Nakusp

Post by cncpc »

---------- ADS -----------
 
Good judgment comes from experience. Experience often comes from bad judgment.
Indanao
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 439
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 4:25 pm

Re: BC Plane Crash - Nakusp

Post by Indanao »

I see he never mentioned engine failure. ( If it were, best glide range speed for flap setting - no flaps if high enough to remove them - giving minimum descent rate, wings level, try to touch slightly nose up, doors open, fly the dials, and take what you get? )
---------- ADS -----------
 
Indanao
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 439
Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 4:25 pm

Re: BC Plane Crash - Nakusp

Post by Indanao »

Nordo wrote:
Cat Driver wrote:I wonder how many float plane pilots there are out there who never saw glassy water doing their sea plane rating?
I would imagine there are a ton of guys out there who have not seen glass. I would even bet there are a few who have maybe even seen a season without seeing it. ..........
My condolences to the family and the friends for the sudden loss.

I doubt there is a float plane pilot in Canada who has never seen glassy water. If they have minimum time they may never have landed on it. All were taught during training, but conditions may not have been glassy.

This fellow had been doing it for forty years.
---------- ADS -----------
 
cncpc
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1715
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 10:17 am

Re: BC Plane Crash - Nakusp

Post by cncpc »

It wasn't engine failure. He was landing at Nakusp Marina to get his buddy a fishing license.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Good judgment comes from experience. Experience often comes from bad judgment.
User avatar
Cat Driver
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 18921
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 8:31 pm

Re: BC Plane Crash - Nakusp

Post by Cat Driver »

What do the front section of the floats in that picture tell you about the attitude at touch down?
---------- ADS -----------
 
The hardest thing about flying is knowing when to say no


After over a half a century of flying no one ever died because of my decision not to fly.
Hornblower
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 686
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 6:58 am

Re: BC Plane Crash - Nakusp

Post by Hornblower »

I guess I'll beat the TSB to the punch ... must have been the external load that caused it ... no way it was : pilot experience, pilot skill, water conditions, wind conditions, mechanical problems. Of course I could be wrong, they (the TSB) may also decide to cite as causal factors ... wait for it ... UNAPPROVED FLOAT BALLS.
---------- ADS -----------
 
robertsailor1
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 643
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 6:05 pm

Re: BC Plane Crash - Nakusp

Post by robertsailor1 »

This quote was in the local paper by an eye witness.

Nakusp resident Ray Lythgoe was taking a stroll along the Nakusp waterfront shortly after 8 a.m. He heard a plane engine sputter and die, and looked up to see the descending plane.

"I heard the motor go dead," Lythgoe said, "then a big splash." Conditions were sunny and calm at the time.
---------- ADS -----------
 
robertsailor1
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 643
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 6:05 pm

Re: BC Plane Crash - Nakusp

Post by robertsailor1 »

Take it back, earlier quote. Later quote from the pilot confirms pilot error.
---------- ADS -----------
 
pilotidentity
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 175
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:00 am

Re: BC Plane Crash - Nakusp

Post by pilotidentity »

To all you glassy water experts out there you should read the news update - the 79 year old pilot had been flying for 40 years - he knew how to land on glassy water - he admitted he just f'd it up.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Redneck_pilot86
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1330
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:47 pm
Location: between 60 and 70

Re: BC Plane Crash - Nakusp

Post by Redneck_pilot86 »

Why is it that the First Air thread is full of people complaining about using an accident the speculate on the cause, but in this thread the third poster has all the answers and noone has any problem with this?
---------- ADS -----------
 
The only three things a wingman should ever say: 1. "Two's up" 2. "You're on fire" 3. "I'll take the fat one"
180
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 636
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 2:10 pm

Re: BC Plane Crash - Nakusp

Post by 180 »

Redneck_pilot86 wrote:Why is it that the First Air thread is full of people complaining about using an accident the speculate on the cause, but in this thread the third poster has all the answers and noone has any problem with this?
He was repeating what he read in the news report from the previous poster. The pilot was interviewed and said he was tricked by the glassy water. It's not speculation when it comes from the horse's...
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “Accidents, Incidents & Overdue Aircraft”