Private Air

Got a hot employment or interview tip to help a fellow aviator find a job or looking for a little job advice place your posting here.

Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako

Post Reply
full_flaps
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 46
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:52 pm

Private Air

Post by full_flaps »

Anyone know what Pay,schedule and routes are like at Private Air?
Good place to work ??
---------- ADS -----------
 
delay256
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 45
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2011 11:47 am

Re: Private Air

Post by delay256 »

I am not sure what the current situation is but when I first got my license in 2008, I had a sit down with John and he was extremely friendly and gave me a good outline of the company profile. He's one of the few management pilots that takes the time to answer most of the employment requests he gets. Very Professional.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Caracrane
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 713
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 3:26 pm
Location: Québec City

Re: Private Air

Post by Caracrane »

Is Kelner under PA ?


Their adress is in YQT
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Bushav8er
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 936
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 11:37 am
Location: Northern Can

Re: Private Air

Post by Bushav8er »

Caracrane wrote:Is Kelner under PA ?


Their adress is in YQT
PA is under Kelner.
---------- ADS -----------
 
goleafsgo
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 294
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 10:13 pm

Re: Private Air

Post by goleafsgo »

How much time do they want for FO's?
---------- ADS -----------
 
AllClutch
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 187
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 8:10 pm

Re: Private Air

Post by AllClutch »

99% of what Kelner runs is single pilot
The PC-12 is a lovely one person aircraft the only time you see them run otherwise is mostly medical where the contract specifies 2 crew, I'd be very surprised if these gentleman require a FO.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Johnny
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 255
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 7:37 pm
Location: Toronto

Re: Private Air

Post by Johnny »

AllClutch wrote:99% of what Kelner runs is single pilot
The PC-12 is a lovely one person aircraft the only time you see them run otherwise is mostly medical where the contract specifies 2 crew, I'd be very surprised if these gentleman require a FO.
Hi AllClutch,
While I agree that the PC-12 is a lovely one-person aircraft, I must correct your statement. Most of our flying is done with two crew, under an approved 2-crew operation. This is reflected throughout our manuals, systems, and our policies in all aspects of our operations.

While we retain the capability to operate our aircraft single-pilot, which is the certification level of the aircraft, our stated and practised preference is with two qualified and trained pilots. At minimum, the PIC requires a PPC and the SIC requires a PCC.

The aircraft mentioned in the recent job posting has a full-time co-pilot assigned to it.

Overall, I would estimate we fly less than 5% of our revenue-generating flights single-pilot - and those are unique circumstances reserved for aircraft owner flights (no external charter).

I hope this helps to clarify our operating position with respect to single pilot.
The PC-12 is also a lovely two-person aircraft...

John
---------- ADS -----------
 
Johnny
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 255
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 7:37 pm
Location: Toronto

Re: Private Air

Post by Johnny »

goleafsgo wrote:How much time do they want for FO's?
Good evening,
We are not currently seeking First Officers.
Typically we look for 1,000 hours minimum. We will go lower if a candidate shows exceptional capability in a relevant field/area.

Preference is given to candidates who have some IFR and/or turbine experience, and a working knowledge of charter flying (especially in Canada, USA, Caribbean) is helpful.

We hire from a wide range of backgrounds, not just charter pilots! Pilots who are employed as flight instructors, tow pilots, patrol, etc - looking to make a career change are welcome and encouraged to apply when we are hiring co-pilots.
---------- ADS -----------
 
MagicMilkshake
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 24
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2011 9:56 am

Re: Private Air

Post by MagicMilkshake »

Johnny wrote:We are not currently seeking First Officers..
When is the most likely time you may be seeking for First Officers?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Johnny
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 255
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 7:37 pm
Location: Toronto

Re: Private Air

Post by Johnny »

MagicMilkshake wrote:When is the most likely time you may be seeking for First Officers?
MagicMilkshake,
It is difficult to say when we will next be hiring. It depends on when we have movement within the company.

John
---------- ADS -----------
 
Flap_Operator
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 122
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2012 10:01 pm

Re: Private Air

Post by Flap_Operator »

MagicMilkshake wrote:
Johnny wrote:We are not currently seeking First Officers..
When is the most likely time you may be seeking for First Officers?
When the current one leaves or upgrades to captain! 8)

Im sorry the door was wide open
---------- ADS -----------
 
Tanker299
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 166
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 7:16 am

Re: Private Air

Post by Tanker299 »

Why the requirement for turbine command time no exceptions? After start they are simpler to operate, admittedly if you make a mistake the cost is far higher. Piston engines require far more care and fore thought before you do things. Pistons also fail a lot more then turbines and any FO time on a turbine should be ok. Is it insurance?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Johnny
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 255
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 7:37 pm
Location: Toronto

Re: Private Air

Post by Johnny »

Tanker299 wrote:if you make a mistake the cost is far higher
This is basically what it comes down to.

Insurance requires turbine command experience - whether that is gained (supervised) through our operation during the upgrade process or if we hire externally.
Additionally the aircraft owner wants someone who has turbine command experience.

It is not unusual, in the small business environment, to seek candidates who have very similar previous experience.

Not at all knocking the piston pilots, but we do not operate that type of equipment.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Tanker299
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 166
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 7:16 am

Re: Private Air

Post by Tanker299 »

Thanks for the reply.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Colonel Sanders
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 7512
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 5:17 pm
Location: Over Macho Grande

Re: Private Air

Post by Colonel Sanders »

If you've already spent thousands of hours operating
piston engines (radial, supercharged, turbocharged, geared)
then moving to a turbine is like plumbing.

There's a lot to it, but nothing you can't learn in one day.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Oxi
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 480
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2011 9:33 pm

Re: Private Air

Post by Oxi »

Can anyone shed some light on PA?
---------- ADS -----------
 
B52
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 206
Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2013 5:28 pm

Re: Private Air

Post by B52 »

There are some serious problems in the way Insurance Companies assess risk.
I can think of a string of accidents where I would not have approved coverage
with the combination of pilot, aircraft and environment.

Most accidents are predictable as is the risk of an accident.

Buried deep in those employment interview records, are the key indicators
that are generally ignored or misunderstood.

While CS says that there is nothing that can't be learned in a day about turbines
the reality is that what is learned in a day can be forgotten in a day.

The goal of having PIC Turbine time is that someone else has already suffered the
highest risk time.

PC are to be commended on their duel pilot / single pilot policy.

It's also tragic to see the number of single pilot turbine operations around
the world that do not factor risk versus costs in factoring single v two pilot operation.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “Employment Forum”