
Rouge
Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, I WAS Birddog
-
- Rank 5
- Posts: 342
- Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 7:59 am
Re: Rouge
I'm wondering what will make this operation "low cost" because isn't the only difference the pay for flight crew and attendants? (and if so is it really that much of a difference?) Fuel, landing fees, maintenance etc.... will all be the same, no? Just wondering what edge Rouge has to fly these routes cheaper than mainline is currently doing them.
- YYZSaabGuy
- Rank 8
- Posts: 851
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 7:32 am
- Location: On glideslope.
Re: Rouge
I think the logic is that Rouge will be profitable due to use of a higher-density seating configuration on the aircraft, as well as lower flight crew wages (as you noted above) and more flexible work rules than those governing existing mainline employees. Fare unbundling will also likely play a role. However: I'm guessing the strategic rationale is more important, i.e. to prevent further penetration of AC's customer abse by other low-cost carriers, i.e. Sunwing Vacations, Air Transat, and WestJet.indieadventurer wrote:I'm wondering what will make this operation "low cost" because isn't the only difference the pay for flight crew and attendants? (and if so is it really that much of a difference?) Fuel, landing fees, maintenance etc.... will all be the same, no? Just wondering what edge Rouge has to fly these routes cheaper than mainline is currently doing them.
Re: Rouge
Low Cost is just an illusion in this case because whatever money is saved by lowering flight crew and support staff wages will be eaten up in executive compensation and bonuses while the poor pax will be suffering with their knees jammed into the seat back in front of them while they pay for crappy food.
Rouge = red = the colour of embarrassment = what senior management at AC should be in launching this next to fail effort.
Rouge = red = the colour of embarrassment = what senior management at AC should be in launching this next to fail effort.
- fingersmac
- Rank 7
- Posts: 606
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 4:17 pm
Re: Rouge
I wouldn't be surprised in the least if Rouge was spun off in the future just like Jazz was. Calin & friends will make it look attractive enough for an IPO, cash in and move on. If not, it will go the way of Zip and Tango.
-
- Rank 7
- Posts: 564
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 2:00 pm
- Location: YYZ
Re: Rouge
+1. All the money that they are going to piss away on this imminent failure could have been used to satisfy the demands of employees... the people who ACTUALLY create the value instead of these hair brain ideas that fail time after time.Rockie wrote:History and an eerily consistent track record.delta1 wrote:Geez people....why so much negativity??
Re: Rouge
How do you figure Rouge will fail? From what I can tell it's already been successful, the unions are fractured and having separate labour groups will only weaken the unions negotiating power moving forward. Think about how difficult it will be for mainline employees to achieve any gains while there are LCC employees making so much less with such inferior work rules.CanadianEh wrote:+1. All the money that they are going to piss away on this imminent failure could have been used to satisfy the demands of employees... the people who ACTUALLY create the value instead of these hair brain ideas that fail time after time.Rockie wrote:History and an eerily consistent track record.delta1 wrote:Geez people....why so much negativity??
Aside from that, Rouge does not carry the same the risk that Zip or Tango did, 95% of the flying it will do are already established mainline routes, but with the margins increased thanks to lower labour costs. This unit is simply about reducing seat mile costs to be competitive. Calin what happened to 'culture change'?
Re: Rouge
Isn't the entire Rouge operation being run on contract by Sky Regional?fingersmac wrote:I wouldn't be surprised in the least if Rouge was spun off in the future just like Jazz was. Calin & friends will make it look attractive enough for an IPO, cash in and move on. If not, it will go the way of Zip and Tango.
-
- Rank 0
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 10:28 am
Re: Rouge
I seriously expected more......Athens, Edinbourgh and Venice?????? Thats what I got from thier website. I expected way more than that. Transat and other gonna survive and thrive if thats all for this year on the Atlantic routes.
And the fuel surcharges, OMG.
I have spoken to a few people (including my neighbour), somehow they are under the impression that they will get mainline type seats and service, oh what a nasty surprize they are in for, its gonna be no different than flying Transat or others.
Winter gonna be a different story, already huge excess capacity in the market, going to be tough to make any money there.
Should go the way of Tango and Zip within a few years. Even with pilots and flight attendants making substantially less, the baggage handlers, maintenance, grooming, checkin, management etc etc still gets paid the same as mainline, and has all the same inefficiancies and wastage built in.
Now, if I see Swissport (or similar) suddenly doing the ground handling, grooming, contract checkin, and Wright International (or similar) doing the maintenance etc, then I know that they might be in it for the long haul. Till the, IMO, not gonna last for more than two or three years.
And the fuel surcharges, OMG.
I have spoken to a few people (including my neighbour), somehow they are under the impression that they will get mainline type seats and service, oh what a nasty surprize they are in for, its gonna be no different than flying Transat or others.
Winter gonna be a different story, already huge excess capacity in the market, going to be tough to make any money there.
Should go the way of Tango and Zip within a few years. Even with pilots and flight attendants making substantially less, the baggage handlers, maintenance, grooming, checkin, management etc etc still gets paid the same as mainline, and has all the same inefficiancies and wastage built in.
Now, if I see Swissport (or similar) suddenly doing the ground handling, grooming, contract checkin, and Wright International (or similar) doing the maintenance etc, then I know that they might be in it for the long haul. Till the, IMO, not gonna last for more than two or three years.
Re: Rouge
Rouge will be operated my mainline Air Canada pilots represented by ACPA.cj555 wrote:Isn't the entire Rouge operation being run on contract by Sky Regional?fingersmac wrote:I wouldn't be surprised in the least if Rouge was spun off in the future just like Jazz was. Calin & friends will make it look attractive enough for an IPO, cash in and move on. If not, it will go the way of Zip and Tango.
Re: Rouge
There will only be 2 B767s for summer 2013. How many destinations did you expect to have service with 2 aircraft?excv580mech wrote:I seriously expected more......Athens, Edinbourgh and Venice?????? Thats what I got from thier website. I expected way more than that. Transat and other gonna survive and thrive if thats all for this year on the Atlantic routes.
Yup. That's the point.its gonna be no different than flying Transat or others.
Re: Rouge
That's not entirely true Stig, in a spin off situation you would be considered rouge pilots and given a choice, like the choice given to the AVEOS employees. It's a separate company and at least for now they are ACPA pilots, but they are not mainline pilotsTheStig wrote:Rouge will be operated my mainline Air Canada pilots represented by ACPA.cj555 wrote:Isn't the entire Rouge operation being run on contract by Sky Regional?fingersmac wrote:I wouldn't be surprised in the least if Rouge was spun off in the future just like Jazz was. Calin & friends will make it look attractive enough for an IPO, cash in and move on. If not, it will go the way of Zip and Tango.
Re: Rouge
+1delta1 wrote:Geez people....why so much negativity??
Man I've never seen so much hating..! I wonder if those with negative thoughts work for AC.
If so, damn.
Must suck to come into work every day when you hate your company so much.
I fly for a 703-704 operator and am very happy flying to airports in the middle of nowhere with my little turbo prop, no auto pilot, loading pax bags myself, and deicing my own plane. Would feel privileged to fly for AC. Although I do agree many challenges and conflict exits with management and employees, I still think Rouge will help AC be more competitive with all other low cost operators like transat and sunwing. At least I hope it will.
I truly believe only time will tell. Anything else is speculation.
I wish AC and its employees much success.
My two cents..
Cheers
-
- Rank 2
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 11:21 am
Re: Rouge
There are positives about Rouge...
Its a good place to go if your a junior ACPA member
- ACPA Pilots
- Socialized Bidding
- Overtime opportunities
- Productive flying
- Nice equipment (with cool paintjob
)
I can't see how Rouge will fail since they are taking over certain mainline routes with a cheaper operating cost with more seats
I know many Mainline pilots bidding there for their first command.
Its a good place to go if your a junior ACPA member
- ACPA Pilots
- Socialized Bidding
- Overtime opportunities
- Productive flying
- Nice equipment (with cool paintjob

I can't see how Rouge will fail since they are taking over certain mainline routes with a cheaper operating cost with more seats
I know many Mainline pilots bidding there for their first command.
-
- Rank 7
- Posts: 564
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 2:00 pm
- Location: YYZ
Re: Rouge
-ACPA pilots for now...bravowhiskey wrote:There are positives about Rouge...
Its a good place to go if your a junior ACPA member
- ACPA Pilots
- Socialized Bidding
- Overtime opportunities
- Productive flying
- Nice equipment (with cool paintjob)
I can't see how Rouge will fail since they are taking over certain mainline routes with a cheaper operating cost with more seats
I know many Mainline pilots bidding there for their first command.
-Socialized bidding has not been described in the FOS. Nobody knows how it will be implemented.
-There are AVO opportunities at mainline now in the FOS.
-Productive to the point of being onerous. CARs limits with serious fatigue issues.
-The B767s are 30+ years old and they are going to pack in 275 pax. There will be no rest facility, no bunk and I believe no RP.
-The A319s are 25+ years old.
-First command will mean they are back on probation, in charge of planes with multiple MELs and pressure to get the mission done. For many, if they bid command, especially the B767, it will be a pay cut as they will be in year one Captain scale = $118/hr.
... and those are your positives.