Air Canada #4

Discuss topics relating to airlines.

Moderators: sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, North Shore

Post Reply
Genetk44
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 9:31 pm

Air Canada #4

Post by Genetk44 »

Looks like Air Canada isn't the best...number 4 after Alaskan,Delta and American
http://www.jdpower.com/press-releases/2 ... tion-study
---------- ADS -----------
 
Koalemos
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 73
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2012 12:22 pm

Re: Air Canada #4

Post by Koalemos »

The study measures passenger satisfaction with North America airline carriers based on performance in seven factors (in order of importance): cost and fees; in-flight services; boarding/deplaning/baggage; flight crew; aircraft; check-in; and reservation. - See more at: http://www.jdpower.com/press-releases/2 ... CKRAs.dpuf

...

Satisfaction with cost and fees, which has the greatest impact on overall satisfaction, improves to 642 in 2014 from 618 in 2013. - See more at: http://www.jdpower.com/press-releases/2 ... CKRAs.dpuf
Not surprisingly, customers are willing to sacrifice everything to fly cheap. Doesn't matter if the plane is held together by speed tape and the pilots meet bare minimums for experience and training (fifth and fourth place in importance, respectively) ... Until something goes wrong, or the flight is late/delayed, of course. :roll:
---------- ADS -----------
 
bmc
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 4014
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 10:06 pm
Location: Switzerland

Re: Air Canada #4

Post by bmc »

North American airlines are pretty pathetic compared to other parts of the world. Service has been so stripped away, I often wonder what criteria they are rating these airlines on.

That said, AC has an excellent international business class product that is far superior to US carriers business or in some cases first class transatlantic products.
---------- ADS -----------
 
bmc
rxl
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 691
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 6:17 am
Location: Terminal 4

Re: Air Canada #4

Post by rxl »

Ryan Air?? Easy Jet??
---------- ADS -----------
 
Gino Under
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 834
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 12:06 pm

Re: Air Canada #4

Post by Gino Under »

this is my favourite airline...where things get explained!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYAq-7sOzXQ

Gino Under :partyman:
---------- ADS -----------
 
jd832
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2011 6:37 am

Re: Air Canada #4

Post by jd832 »

Koalemos wrote:
The study measures passenger satisfaction with North America airline carriers based on performance in seven factors (in order of importance): cost and fees; in-flight services; boarding/deplaning/baggage; flight crew; aircraft; check-in; and reservation. - See more at: http://www.jdpower.com/press-releases/2 ... CKRAs.dpuf

...

Satisfaction with cost and fees, which has the greatest impact on overall satisfaction, improves to 642 in 2014 from 618 in 2013. - See more at: http://www.jdpower.com/press-releases/2 ... CKRAs.dpuf
Not surprisingly, customers are willing to sacrifice everything to fly cheap. Doesn't matter if the plane is held together by speed tape and the pilots meet bare minimums for experience and training (fifth and fourth place in importance, respectively) ... Until something goes wrong, or the flight is late/delayed, of course. :roll:
I've worked in the States and the training at the regional airlines in the U.S. is a lot harder than it is here in Canada. When it comes the majors airlines in the States, their first officers don't meet bare minimums, they exceed it with thousands of hours of transport category jet time unlike Air Canada who hires first officers without previous 705 experience or jet time not to say they're not qualified, but my point is, new hire FO's at the legacy carries in the U.S. on average have several thousand hours of PIC transport category jet time and if not PIC time, thousands of hours of SIC transport category turbine time and a 4 year university degree. They are highly experience pilots. You cant get an interview without at least 3000hrs+ transport category turbine time at the majors. Military, Part 121, jet part 135 or ICAO equivalent experience is a must to get a legacy job.
---------- ADS -----------
 
True North
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 498
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 6:39 pm

Re: Air Canada #4

Post by True North »

jd832 wrote:I've worked in the States and the training at the regional airlines in the U.S. is a lot harder than it is here in Canada. When it comes the majors airlines in the States, their first officers don't meet bare minimums, they exceed it with thousands of hours of transport category jet time unlike Air Canada who hires first officers without previous 705 experience or jet time not to say they're not qualified, but my point is, new hire FO's at the legacy carries in the U.S. on average have several thousand hours of PIC transport category jet time and if not PIC time, thousands of hours of SIC transport category turbine time and a 4 year university degree. They are highly experience pilots. You cant get an interview without at least 3000hrs+ transport category turbine time at the majors. Military, Part 121, jet part 135 or ICAO equivalent experience is a must to get a legacy job.
I spent the bulk of my career working in the States and that statement is complete and utter BS.
---------- ADS -----------
 
sstaurus
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 734
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 4:32 pm

Re: Air Canada #4

Post by sstaurus »

True North wrote:
jd832 wrote:I've worked in the States and the training at the regional airlines in the U.S. is a lot harder than it is here in Canada. When it comes the majors airlines in the States, their first officers don't meet bare minimums, they exceed it with thousands of hours of transport category jet time unlike Air Canada who hires first officers without previous 705 experience or jet time not to say they're not qualified, but my point is, new hire FO's at the legacy carries in the U.S. on average have several thousand hours of PIC transport category jet time and if not PIC time, thousands of hours of SIC transport category turbine time and a 4 year university degree. They are highly experience pilots. You cant get an interview without at least 3000hrs+ transport category turbine time at the majors. Military, Part 121, jet part 135 or ICAO equivalent experience is a must to get a legacy job.
I spent the bulk of my career working in the States and that statement is complete and utter BS.
Perhaps you'd care to expand then. I don't see it as utter BS, the majority hired at the legacies do spend a lot of time at a regional first, and competition is high so you need to know someone or have extras (like a degree). Can't comment about training being any harder...
---------- ADS -----------
 
AboveTheRuin
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 19
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 11:33 am

Re: Air Canada #4

Post by AboveTheRuin »

True North wrote:
jd832 wrote:I've worked in the States and the training at the regional airlines in the U.S. is a lot harder than it is here in Canada. When it comes the majors airlines in the States, their first officers don't meet bare minimums, they exceed it with thousands of hours of transport category jet time unlike Air Canada who hires first officers without previous 705 experience or jet time not to say they're not qualified, but my point is, new hire FO's at the legacy carries in the U.S. on average have several thousand hours of PIC transport category jet time and if not PIC time, thousands of hours of SIC transport category turbine time and a 4 year university degree. They are highly experience pilots. You cant get an interview without at least 3000hrs+ transport category turbine time at the majors. Military, Part 121, jet part 135 or ICAO equivalent experience is a must to get a legacy job.
I spent the bulk of my career working in the States and that statement is complete and utter BS.
"Complete and utter BS" - I don't think so..
I've seen it first had as well, and view the statement above regarding as highly accurate..
I sure don't recall having to be drilled in a 3 hour oral exam prior to even stepping into the sim for a PPC in Canada either.. Thank God.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
ThatArmyGuy
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 175
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 4:30 pm
Location: GNSS is U/S

Re: Air Canada #4

Post by ThatArmyGuy »

Gino Under wrote:this is my favourite airline...where things get explained!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYAq-7sOzXQ
Maybe College Humour could clarify the training/experience requirements in the US that we're arguing about.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Airline Industry Comments”