Why are AC pilots voting for relief pilot pay 30 to 40% less than FO?

Discuss topics relating to airlines.

Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako

Post Reply
HFNav
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2024 8:59 am

Why are AC pilots voting for relief pilot pay 30 to 40% less than FO?

Post by HFNav »

2 identical pilots, same new hire class

number out of hat

one starts relief pilot 787, the other as FO 787
similar work

Why are AC pilots voting for relief pilot pay 30 to 40% less than FO?

787

Year 3 FO - $132.07
Year 3 RP - $101.73
31% more

Year 4 FO - $154.75
Year 4 RP - $109.74
41% more


Where in the United or Delta agreements are these discounts?


New Virgin Australia TA is $183,137 for a 1st year FO
---------- ADS -----------
 
dialdriver
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 336
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 10:09 am

Re: Why are AC pilots voting for relief pilot pay 30 to 40% less than FO?

Post by dialdriver »

Welcome to seniority buddy, you signed up for it.
---------- ADS -----------
 
cdnavater
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2558
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2021 11:25 am

Re: Why are AC pilots voting for relief pilot pay 30 to 40% less than FO?

Post by cdnavater »

It is my understanding that RPs are not trained to the same level, a condensed program, not trained to land the aircraft, only cruise relief duties, therefore paid less
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
flying4dollars
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1410
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 8:56 am

Re: Why are AC pilots voting for relief pilot pay 30 to 40% less than FO?

Post by flying4dollars »

cdnavater wrote: Sat Sep 28, 2024 8:05 pm It is my understanding that RPs are not trained to the same level, a condensed program, not trained to land the aircraft, only cruise relief duties, therefore paid less
Correct
---------- ADS -----------
 
altiplano
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5680
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 2:24 pm

Re: Why are AC pilots voting for relief pilot pay 30 to 40% less than FO?

Post by altiplano »

WB FOs work harder than RPs.

RP is a lifestyle position for most, certainly those still on it after the first couple years.
---------- ADS -----------
 
LandingLights
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2024 12:45 am

Re: Why are AC pilots voting for relief pilot pay 30 to 40% less than FO?

Post by LandingLights »

cdnavater wrote: Sat Sep 28, 2024 8:05 pm It is my understanding that RPs are not trained to the same level, a condensed program, not trained to land the aircraft, only cruise relief duties, therefore paid less
Currently, FOs and RPs go through the exact same training course. The only difference is during the TC Evaluation Event, for which RPs get a few less items ticked off.

AC is the only airline in North America that utilizes RPs. It is a huge cost savings compared to other airlines staffing flights with multiple CA/FOs.

Ideally, everyone should be trained & paid as FO, and bid for desired Operating/Augment flight pairings based solely on seniority.

With the A321XLRs coming, look forward to having A320RP positions :rolleyes: . If not, they shouldn't have any other RP positions.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Canadaflyer46
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 598
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2021 4:27 pm

Re: Why are AC pilots voting for relief pilot pay 30 to 40% less than FO?

Post by Canadaflyer46 »

Does any other NA airline have relief pilots/second officers? Pretty sure the only purpose of the RP program is to drive down costs. Yeah. WCC etc.
---------- ADS -----------
 
TheStig
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 870
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 12:34 pm

Re: Why are AC pilots voting for relief pilot pay 30 to 40% less than FO?

Post by TheStig »

When comparing the wide-body fleet as a percentage of their overall fleets, here's a breakdown for Air Canada, United Airlines, and Delta Airlines:

1. Air Canada: About 50% of its fleet consists of wide-body aircraft. This includes planes like the Boeing 777, 787, and Airbus A330, which are used for long-haul international flights.

2. United Airlines: Approximately 27% of United's fleet is made up of wide-body aircraft, primarily including Boeing 777, 787, and 767s.

3. Delta operates a slightly higher percentage, with about 30% of its fleet comprising wide-body aircraft, such as the Airbus A330 and Boeing 767.

Thus, Air Canada has a significantly larger portion of its fleet in wide-body aircraft compared to both United and Delta, making it more reliant on these aircraft for international operations.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Me262
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 522
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2016 6:35 pm

Re: Why are AC pilots voting for relief pilot pay 30 to 40% less than FO?

Post by Me262 »

How long does it take to bid from RP to FO? Being RP on flat pay is definitely much better, now with only 2 years that could change, but on the old 4 years, that was definitely the way to go.
---------- ADS -----------
 
CaptDukeNukem
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1989
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2022 9:33 am

Re: Why are AC pilots voting for relief pilot pay 30 to 40% less than FO?

Post by CaptDukeNukem »

Me262 wrote: Fri Oct 04, 2024 1:30 pm How long does it take to bid from RP to FO? Being RP on flat pay is definitely much better, now with only 2 years that could change, but on the old 4 years, that was definitely the way to go.
Are you sure about that? RPs were getting shit schedules with massive DHs paid at 50% time. The grass isn’t greener
---------- ADS -----------
 
Me262
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 522
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2016 6:35 pm

Re: Why are AC pilots voting for relief pilot pay 30 to 40% less than FO?

Post by Me262 »

CaptDukeNukem wrote: Sat Oct 05, 2024 7:00 am
Me262 wrote: Fri Oct 04, 2024 1:30 pm How long does it take to bid from RP to FO? Being RP on flat pay is definitely much better, now with only 2 years that could change, but on the old 4 years, that was definitely the way to go.
Are you sure about that? RPs were getting shit schedules with massive DHs paid at 50% time. The grass isn’t greener
I'm sure straight from my buddies mouth that said he loved RP. First 4 years was same pay with a much better schedule. Then he bid FO before the 4 years were up, but because he wasn't trained before people below him in seniority got trained, he's getting paid FO now while still doing RP near the top of seniority schedule, waiting to get trained for FO.
---------- ADS -----------
 
CaptDukeNukem
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1989
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2022 9:33 am

Re: Why are AC pilots voting for relief pilot pay 30 to 40% less than FO?

Post by CaptDukeNukem »

Me262 wrote: Sat Oct 05, 2024 9:30 am
CaptDukeNukem wrote: Sat Oct 05, 2024 7:00 am
Me262 wrote: Fri Oct 04, 2024 1:30 pm How long does it take to bid from RP to FO? Being RP on flat pay is definitely much better, now with only 2 years that could change, but on the old 4 years, that was definitely the way to go.
Are you sure about that? RPs were getting shit schedules with massive DHs paid at 50% time. The grass isn’t greener
I'm sure straight from my buddies mouth that said he loved RP. First 4 years was same pay with a much better schedule. Then he bid FO before the 4 years were up, but because he wasn't trained before people below him in seniority got trained, he's getting paid FO now while still doing RP near the top of seniority schedule, waiting to get trained for FO.
Yea…. I don’t think it’s quite as simple. Hearing it from your buddy is one thing. I’m sure he likes it to the extent that he wants it to be. RP is not a bad job.
In my opinion, it shouldnt exists at all. They should all be qualified as FOs. But let’s leave that for another thread.

I think what im trying to get at here, is that RPs are an equivalent role created for airlines to somehow abuse the ranks more.

Sure it can offer someone a better schedule, but it’s really not much of a difference. They used to have flight engineers. When they were needed

Edited for grammar which I probably missed like three other ones
---------- ADS -----------
 
thepoors
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 407
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2022 8:27 am

Re: Why are AC pilots voting for relief pilot pay 30 to 40% less than FO?

Post by thepoors »

Canadaflyer46 wrote: Sun Sep 29, 2024 5:29 am Does any other NA airline have relief pilots/second officers? Pretty sure the only purpose of the RP program is to drive down costs. Yeah. WCC etc.
No, AC is the only one with this bullshit position. Every US airline trains their FOs as FOs and uses them as augments. And you are correct of course, that is exactly it's purpose.

Why anyone would want to be an RP I don't know...just the potential of having to deadhead 16hr flights in Y is enough of a deterrent for me.
---------- ADS -----------
 
lostav8r
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2023 12:54 pm

Re: Why are AC pilots voting for relief pilot pay 30 to 40% less than FO?

Post by lostav8r »

thepoors wrote: Sat Oct 05, 2024 10:43 am
Canadaflyer46 wrote: Sun Sep 29, 2024 5:29 am Does any other NA airline have relief pilots/second officers? Pretty sure the only purpose of the RP program is to drive down costs. Yeah. WCC etc.
No, AC is the only one with this bullshit position. Every US airline trains their FOs as FOs and uses them as augments. And you are correct of course, that is exactly it's purpose.

Why anyone would want to be an RP I don't know...just the potential of having to deadhead 16hr flights in Y is enough of a deterrent for me.
Being a RP sounds like a dream if you want to have a passion project outside flying
---------- ADS -----------
 
200Above
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 10:26 pm

Re: Why are AC pilots voting for relief pilot pay 30 to 40% less than FO?

Post by 200Above »

lostav8r wrote: Mon Oct 07, 2024 9:13 am
thepoors wrote: Sat Oct 05, 2024 10:43 am
Canadaflyer46 wrote: Sun Sep 29, 2024 5:29 am Does any other NA airline have relief pilots/second officers? Pretty sure the only purpose of the RP program is to drive down costs. Yeah. WCC etc.
No, AC is the only one with this bullshit position. Every US airline trains their FOs as FOs and uses them as augments. And you are correct of course, that is exactly it's purpose.

Why anyone would want to be an RP I don't know...just the potential of having to deadhead 16hr flights in Y is enough of a deterrent for me.
Being a RP sounds like a dream if you want to have a passion project outside flying
Exactly. I'm a top 25% RP and I work 9 days a month. I have a side hustle.

However, with the new TA, we've been left so far in the dust. It's become hard to justify the pay differential versus the other 3 pilots in the flight deck. I understand I don't takeoff or land, but I set up the approach, I grab the ATIS/WAT, deviate around thunderstorms, do the walk around, make the bunks, print the flight plans, and participate in the threat briefing.

A couple more % of the captain salary would have been appropriate. I also think the FO's should be at a higher percentage.

The RP position is great for lifestyle. But each pilot has to weigh the consequences.
---------- ADS -----------
 
HavaJava
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 364
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2004 6:23 am
Location: anywhere but here

Re: Why are AC pilots voting for relief pilot pay 30 to 40% less than FO?

Post by HavaJava »

200Above wrote: Mon Oct 07, 2024 9:49 am
lostav8r wrote: Mon Oct 07, 2024 9:13 am
thepoors wrote: Sat Oct 05, 2024 10:43 am

No, AC is the only one with this bullshit position. Every US airline trains their FOs as FOs and uses them as augments. And you are correct of course, that is exactly it's purpose.

Why anyone would want to be an RP I don't know...just the potential of having to deadhead 16hr flights in Y is enough of a deterrent for me.
Being a RP sounds like a dream if you want to have a passion project outside flying
Exactly. I'm a top 25% RP and I work 9 days a month. I have a side hustle.

However, with the new TA, we've been left so far in the dust. It's become hard to justify the pay differential versus the other 3 pilots in the flight deck. I understand I don't takeoff or land, but I set up the approach, I grab the ATIS/WAT, deviate around thunderstorms, do the walk around, make the bunks, print the flight plans, and participate in the threat briefing.

A couple more % of the captain salary would have been appropriate. I also think the FO's should be at a higher percentage.

The RP position is great for lifestyle. But each pilot has to weigh the consequences.
You should definitely work-to-rule. “Making the bunks” is not part of your (or any pilots) job description. As an FO I make sure to call out any Captain’s BS if they suggest the RP should make the bunks.
---------- ADS -----------
 
alkaseltzer
Rank 5
Rank 5
Posts: 326
Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2018 6:16 pm

Re: Why are AC pilots voting for relief pilot pay 30 to 40% less than FO?

Post by alkaseltzer »

HFNav wrote: Sat Sep 28, 2024 6:37 pm 2 identical pilots, same new hire class

number out of hat

one starts relief pilot 787, the other as FO 787
similar work

Why are AC pilots voting for relief pilot pay 30 to 40% less than FO?

787

Year 3 FO - $132.07
Year 3 RP - $101.73
31% more

Year 4 FO - $154.75
Year 4 RP - $109.74
41% more


Where in the United or Delta agreements are these discounts?


New Virgin Australia TA is $183,137 for a 1st year FO
RP's are equivalent to fluffers. They are not the main act...but play a key role in making sure it goes well.
---------- ADS -----------
 
altiplano
Top Poster
Top Poster
Posts: 5680
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 2:24 pm

Re: Why are AC pilots voting for relief pilot pay 30 to 40% less than FO?

Post by altiplano »

200Above wrote: Mon Oct 07, 2024 9:49 am
lostav8r wrote: Mon Oct 07, 2024 9:13 am
thepoors wrote: Sat Oct 05, 2024 10:43 am

No, AC is the only one with this bullshit position. Every US airline trains their FOs as FOs and uses them as augments. And you are correct of course, that is exactly it's purpose.

Why anyone would want to be an RP I don't know...just the potential of having to deadhead 16hr flights in Y is enough of a deterrent for me.
Being a RP sounds like a dream if you want to have a passion project outside flying
Exactly. I'm a top 25% RP and I work 9 days a month. I have a side hustle.

However, with the new TA, we've been left so far in the dust. It's become hard to justify the pay differential versus the other 3 pilots in the flight deck. I understand I don't takeoff or land, but I set up the approach, I grab the ATIS/WAT, deviate around thunderstorms, do the walk around, make the bunks, print the flight plans, and participate in the threat briefing.

A couple more % of the captain salary would have been appropriate. I also think the FO's should be at a higher percentage.

The RP position is great for lifestyle. But each pilot has to weigh the consequences.
Get a job!

LOL.

I get the ATIS and make the beds... I participate... not sure if that's sarcasm in your post or if you're serious?

RP is an embarrassment to our group, it's a lifestyle hobby job for sure. Good for new moms and new hires and then it's time to join the ranks of the rest of us. If you are happy to stay there and do little, that's your prerogative, I get it, great way to ride out flat pay or whatever. I rode the middle seat myself for a bit, needed some "me time." But I for one don't want to see another nickel put into a position I'd like to see outright eliminated.

The fact is at 25% RP you could be in any FO position or NB CA position and get paid. If you want to earn you know what to do and it isn't staying there.
---------- ADS -----------
 
yycflyguy
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2784
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 9:18 am

Re: Why are AC pilots voting for relief pilot pay 30 to 40% less than FO?

Post by yycflyguy »

HavaJava wrote: Mon Oct 07, 2024 10:01 am
200Above wrote: Mon Oct 07, 2024 9:49 am
lostav8r wrote: Mon Oct 07, 2024 9:13 am

Being a RP sounds like a dream if you want to have a passion project outside flying
Exactly. I'm a top 25% RP and I work 9 days a month. I have a side hustle.

However, with the new TA, we've been left so far in the dust. It's become hard to justify the pay differential versus the other 3 pilots in the flight deck. I understand I don't takeoff or land, but I set up the approach, I grab the ATIS/WAT, deviate around thunderstorms, do the walk around, make the bunks, print the flight plans, and participate in the threat briefing.

A couple more % of the captain salary would have been appropriate. I also think the FO's should be at a higher percentage.

The RP position is great for lifestyle. But each pilot has to weigh the consequences.
You should definitely work-to-rule. “Making the bunks” is not part of your (or any pilots) job description. As an FO I make sure to call out any Captain’s BS if they suggest the RP should make the bunks.
I bet you’re disgusted by the suggestion of doing the logbook, getting some WAT or making a break schedule. Somebody didn’t play team sports.
---------- ADS -----------
 
newlygrounded
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 614
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2020 8:28 pm

Re: Why are AC pilots voting for relief pilot pay 30 to 40% less than FO?

Post by newlygrounded »

yycflyguy wrote: Thu Oct 31, 2024 9:05 am
HavaJava wrote: Mon Oct 07, 2024 10:01 am
200Above wrote: Mon Oct 07, 2024 9:49 am

Exactly. I'm a top 25% RP and I work 9 days a month. I have a side hustle.

However, with the new TA, we've been left so far in the dust. It's become hard to justify the pay differential versus the other 3 pilots in the flight deck. I understand I don't takeoff or land, but I set up the approach, I grab the ATIS/WAT, deviate around thunderstorms, do the walk around, make the bunks, print the flight plans, and participate in the threat briefing.

A couple more % of the captain salary would have been appropriate. I also think the FO's should be at a higher percentage.

The RP position is great for lifestyle. But each pilot has to weigh the consequences.
You should definitely work-to-rule. “Making the bunks” is not part of your (or any pilots) job description. As an FO I make sure to call out any Captain’s BS if they suggest the RP should make the bunks.
I bet you’re disgusted by the suggestion of doing the logbook, getting some WAT or making a break schedule. Somebody didn’t play team sports.
Is it such a crazy idea for grown ass men to make their own bunks? Team sports don't involve washing the star players car
---------- ADS -----------
 
flyingcanuck
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 531
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:55 am

Re: Why are AC pilots voting for relief pilot pay 30 to 40% less than FO?

Post by flyingcanuck »

newlygrounded wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:54 am
yycflyguy wrote: Thu Oct 31, 2024 9:05 am
HavaJava wrote: Mon Oct 07, 2024 10:01 am

You should definitely work-to-rule. “Making the bunks” is not part of your (or any pilots) job description. As an FO I make sure to call out any Captain’s BS if they suggest the RP should make the bunks.
I bet you’re disgusted by the suggestion of doing the logbook, getting some WAT or making a break schedule. Somebody didn’t play team sports.
Is it such a crazy idea for grown ass men to make their own bunks? Team sports don't involve washing the star players car
I don't get the hate. I'm on the 87. I see it as a nice thing to do for the crew while they're programming and you're twiddling your thumbs. Everyone gets a few more minutes of sleep. Were a team, but some have some really shallow egos who cant handle it I guess.
---------- ADS -----------
 
newlygrounded
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 614
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2020 8:28 pm

Re: Why are AC pilots voting for relief pilot pay 30 to 40% less than FO?

Post by newlygrounded »

flyingcanuck wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2024 2:33 pm
newlygrounded wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2024 10:54 am
yycflyguy wrote: Thu Oct 31, 2024 9:05 am

I bet you’re disgusted by the suggestion of doing the logbook, getting some WAT or making a break schedule. Somebody didn’t play team sports.
Is it such a crazy idea for grown ass men to make their own bunks? Team sports don't involve washing the star players car
I don't get the hate. I'm on the 87. I see it as a nice thing to do for the crew while they're programming and you're twiddling your thumbs. Everyone gets a few more minutes of sleep. Were a team, but some have some really shallow egos who cant handle it I guess.
You've got a very shallow ego if you won't wipe another mans ass too :smt040
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Airline Industry Comments”