Skyward Lawsuit

This forum has been developed to discuss aviation related topics.

Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, I WAS Birddog

Post Reply
User avatar
mbflyer
Rank 1
Rank 1
Posts: 43
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 7:58 pm
Location: Next to my computer

Skyward Lawsuit

Post by mbflyer »

From the Winnipeg Free Press....................




A Manitoba-based airline that went out of business in 2005 has been awarded more than $2.1 million in damages stemming from a fiery 1998 plane crash in Wyoming.
Skyward Aviation learned this week the province's highest court had upheld a lower court decision to hold the Cessna Aircraft Company liable for the accident.

Cessna had been seeking to overturn the ruling but the Manitoba Court of Appeal refused. Cessna was also ordered to pay Nortel $270,000 for loss of cargo during the crash.

The two pilots of the plane, both from Thompson, escaped with their lives just seconds before it went up in flames after a botched takeoff.

When the pilots had trouble getting the plane off the ground, they aborted the flight. But the Cessna Citation's drag chute, installed in 1997, failed when it was deployed.

The plane went down a hill, crossed a road, through a field across another road and smashed through a chain-link fence before crashing into a power pole and two cars 750 metres from the runway.
The Skyward flight had stopped in Rawlins, Wyo. to refuel on a flight from Winnipeg to Los Angeles. No one was hurt in the incident, but witnesses said the pilots were lucky to escape with their lives.

"One of the pilots said that as they were leaving the plane, a ball of fire was following them," Rawlins Police Capt. Mike Reed told the Free Press at the time.

The civil court trial found the pilot made an "error in judgment" when calculating the speed needed for take-off. However, the pilot found himself with little runway to work with when attempting to land.

An investigation revealed the cord which attached the drag chute to the aircraft was severed at the time of deployment.

Queen's Bench Justice Jeffrey Oliphant found the pilot would have been able to stop in time had the chute worked properly.

Skyward argued, successfully, that Cessna was guilty of faulty design of the canister in which the chute was contained and stored prior to its release.

Cessna's theory was that the chute was in proper working order and that Skyward was to blame for improperly installing it on their plane.
---------- ADS -----------
 
2024
Rank 3
Rank 3
Posts: 119
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 4:11 pm

Post by 2024 »

i was going through the threads, isn't skyward the company who owe's alot of employees wages ,and vacation pay? maybe the staff might get their money yet.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Fireflyer
Rank 0
Rank 0
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 6:09 pm
Location: Canada

Post by Fireflyer »

I am pretty sure that all the money is going to the insurance company as they were the ones who sued Cessna. The insurance company would of paid out Skyward when the accident happened.

Besides the only people who win in a case like this one is the lawyers.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Comments”