There seems to be a lot of titles and things in quotation marks and with respect to wages I dont think any of it makes a difference, or will make a difference.
have heard it said before that AME's are not recognized as a skilled trade but never really cared too much.
As someone who must work within such a highly regulated industry as aviation. one would think that you could grasp the importance of the definitions associated with a title or word. CARs thinks it so important that there is a section dedicated to it CARs 1.1 Interpretation.
The reason that the AME is technically classed as semi skilled is because there is no recognized apprenticeship and no certification. What we are talking about here is to include the AME as a Trade under the Apprenticeship, Trade and Occupation Certification Act.
1) If this happens then the apprentice time is recognized and certified.
2) The applicable trade board would be responsible to administrate the contract between the employer and the employee.
3) The wages of an apprentice would be regulated based on the progress of the apprentice and calculated as a percentage of the journeyman rate for that shop.
4) The apprentice to AME ratio would be regulated.
5) As a recognized trade the skills you have attained as an AME are recognized by other trades. I.e. An journeyman Automotive mechanic is automatically credited 2 years and 2 out 4 modules toward obtaining a Heavy Duty Technician journeyman status.
This is not my opinion. If you voted yes in this poll these would be requirements under the law.
If you took the time to look at a certified trade as I asked you would already know this and when Norskman asked his question you may have something more informed to say rather than” LOL” and “I have heard it said before that AME's are not recognized as a skilled trade but never really cared too much”. Surely you must realize that an outsider would see these statements as a lackluster attitude towards propelling the profession of AME forward as a trade. If you do want to move AMEs forward help us consistently. You posted on other sites about this poll which is great, but the first question asked on the topic you throw you’re hands up in the air. What is sought as the goal here, is to include the AME as a recognized certified trade under the “Apprenticeship, Trade and Occupation Certification Act”. If the AME is to be included as a trade under this act it must work within the framework of the Act. If you want to get an idea of what the resulting AME trade would look like, view a trade currently regulated by this act like an Automotive Mechanic. That is why I suggested you look it up.
Once again this is not my opinion it would be the law and is the framework under which we would be regulated. This being the case do you wish to change you vote?Because hoptwoit I dont think the regulation of apprentice wages is a good idea therefore I don't see why I would research someone elses idea. I will state an opinion, explain my opinion, listen to your opinion and support it or not, but not research your opinion.
_________________
Is there anything on that remote control lower than mute?