I would somewhat agree with this statement... if it were not at an airshow where hundreds of clueless public were standing around, looking at classic cars at the show n' shine display on the closed taxiway.PilotDAR wrote:\ That said, there remains a tiny fraction of responsibility of people around airports to recognize that air could be moving, and to account for it (tie planes down, control lock on, leave your shiny car in the parking lot, and shield your kids eyes. If you go to the game, the puck or ball might be coming at you, the airport environment is not that different. There's a balance - but the majority of it falls to the pilot.
This is the real problem, the original poster DOESN'T know how much air he's moving, and neither did the pilot in your example. Both of these pilots I'm sure are good, honest, warmhearted people, never intending to inconvenience anyone, harm anyone, or damage other's property.PilotDAR wrote:\ I believe that five aircraft were left damaged, three no longer flyable. Yes, the planes should have been at the very least chocked. The marshaller should have known much better, but the helicopter pilot, as trusting as he was, caused the damage. He knows how much air he's moving. An unfortunate event all the way around. I have no idea who had to pay for what, but morally, this was not just one person's responsibility....
In your example, it is not common practice for aircraft who just pulled up on a ramp for offloading/loading/waiting for passengers/waiting for fuel... to be tied down. Chocked maybe, set the park brake, sure, but when you chock a plane and a crazy unexpected wind hits it from the side, it has a higher tendency to simply tip on it's wing or flip right over instead of acting like a weather vane.
I was at a COPA for kids event a few years ago where there were 7 planes parked all over the ramp, loading and unloading children in a very controlled manner, when a 212 came in and started lifting planes off the ground. Was it the 7 fixed wing pilots fault for using the ramp in the manner it is intended, or the one helicopter pilots fault for not wanting to walk more than 50 feet?
I firmly believe most helicopter pilots from the time they are a student to the time they are an instructor, simply do not understand the effects they have on anything less stable than flat concrete, and if at one pointthey did, they become complacent over time regarding the tornado of destruction they leave in their path.