A successful and uneventful (I assume) driftdown procedure in ETOPS environment.ktcanuck wrote:What did the crew do that was "nice"?
AC 767 Engine Failure
Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister
-
- Rank 3
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 3:11 pm
Re: AC 767 Engine Failure
Re: AC 767 Engine Failure
They also did not cross-feed to the dead engine...
Re: AC 767 Engine Failure
As I said before, I asked you whether you knew something when that "nice" comment. It appears that you didn't. Did you know that they did a nice job? I mean, apart from making it back in one piece? You made a throw-away, meaningless, condescending remark that you didn't know was appropriate or not.flyincanuck wrote:I've been away since the first post. Unbelievable.
So, to the nay-sayers: have you ever said "nice work", "good job", or "well done", after a long day of flying, or a nicely executed touchdown?
I didn't think twice about saying "good work" in the first post.
When someone says "good morning" to you, do you really contemplate whether or not it is a good morning?
Get a life fellas, and stop being so literal.
Now, what do you think about them apples?
-
- Rank 8
- Posts: 975
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 5:27 am
Re: AC 767 Engine Failure
It would be good to know the identities of some posters on here just so that I don't inadvertently congratulate them on a "good job" one day. FFS.
To the AC crew, good job.
To the AC crew, good job.