North Star BT67 put down on lake
Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister
-
- Rank 1
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 7:08 pm
- Location: Ontario, Canada
North Star BT67 put down on lake
couldn't make back to the airport
- Attachments
-
- IMG-20190621-WA0003.jpg (108.85 KiB) Viewed 8643 times
-
- IMG-20190621-WA0002.jpg (100.54 KiB) Viewed 8646 times
Re: North Star BT67 put down on lake
Is that the same plane that went down on a frozen lake 2 years ago?
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
-
- Rank 2
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 7:08 pm
Re: North Star BT67 put down on lake
I cant wait to hear the details of how this came about..
- Daniel Cooper
- Rank 6
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2018 6:38 am
- Location: Unknown
Re: North Star BT67 put down on lake
That one prop doesn't look like it was turning when it hit the water. I'd like to see a pic of the other one.
Re: North Star BT67 put down on lake
I can't see anyone picking up cargo at 1:00 am. I'd imagine this was a fuel hauler. Maybe it was on fire. A hot pump and a leaky hose or something. I'd be wanting to get out of a burning fuel plane asap with tanks full of fuel vapors. Not sure if I'd ditch it or not.
-
- Rank 10
- Posts: 2386
- Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:24 am
Re: North Star BT67 put down on lake
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/thunder- ... -1.5184741
This article says "lost power in both engines shortly after takeoff"
I sure hope they investigate. Crashing two DC3s in 1.5 years isn't a good sign.
This article says "lost power in both engines shortly after takeoff"
I sure hope they investigate. Crashing two DC3s in 1.5 years isn't a good sign.
Re: North Star BT67 put down on lake
I suggest to the TSB that they do a full investigation of both accidents. We get reports for Cessna crashes yet nothing for the previous DC-3 crash.
Re: North Star BT67 put down on lake
If you landed in YPL and forgot to refuel it looks like you'd have just enough fuel to get to YFH but not much more.
Re: North Star BT67 put down on lake
And the idiots hit the ground running. This should be an easy 3 pages of mindless sleuthing by sundown.
Re: North Star BT67 put down on lake
How dark does it get up there at 1 am this time a year? Fairly North, but I imagine it must still have been fairly dark in the middle of the night. To ditch in those circumstances, scary!
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
Re: North Star BT67 put down on lake
Darker than a black steer's tokus on a moonless prairie night.
Please tell us what causes a dual turbine engine failure if not fuel. Volcanic ash? I wonder if they had enough time to get off a mayday call about the "fuel leak".
Re: North Star BT67 put down on lake
lol. too soon...
Liberalism itself as a religion where its tenets cannot be proven, but provides a sense of moral rectitude at no real cost.
Re: North Star BT67 put down on lake
Anyone notice there is a conspicuous lack of fuel on the surface.....






Re: North Star BT67 put down on lake
There can be other reasons for a dual engine failure. Just ask Sully.
-
- Rank 5
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2019 7:27 pm
Re: North Star BT67 put down on lake
Umm, yes you can tell by the ripple effect of the waves behind the rudder that the RH prop is in cruise pitch !!! Yes, That fluid that displaces air in the tanks must have been the problem. ( not enough displacement )
-
- Rank 10
- Posts: 2577
- Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 11:07 pm
- Location: Negative sequencial vortex
Re: North Star BT67 put down on lake
Sully's engines weren't reverse-flow with inertial separators and compressor inlet screens behind a 1900 rpm meat grinder.
If I'd known I was going to live this long, I'd have taken better care of myself
Re: North Star BT67 put down on lake
Meatservo wrote:
Sully's engines weren't reverse-flow with inertial separators and compressor inlet screens behind a 1900 rpm meat grinder.
Touché!
Welcome to Redneck Airlines. We might not get you there but we'll get you close!
Re: North Star BT67 put down on lake
Quartering tailwind with decreasing pressure?
Liberalism itself as a religion where its tenets cannot be proven, but provides a sense of moral rectitude at no real cost.
Re: North Star BT67 put down on lake
OK. How about contaminated fuel like the Cathay A330 guys?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cathay_ ... Flight_780
-
- Rank 10
- Posts: 2577
- Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 11:07 pm
- Location: Negative sequencial vortex
Re: North Star BT67 put down on lake
Could be.pelmet wrote: ↑Sat Jun 22, 2019 3:04 am
OK. How about contaminated fuel like the Cathay A330 guys?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cathay_ ... Flight_780
If I'd known I was going to live this long, I'd have taken better care of myself
Re: North Star BT67 put down on lake
There's no jet fuel in YFH though. So they would have flown there with the contaminated fuel and then have a double flameout on the way back? Possible but not likely. Does anyone know if they carry diesel in the wing tanks also like the 748 does? It's a stretch but I'm wondering if they offloaded their jet fuel from the wings with the diesel by accident.
Re: North Star BT67 put down on lake
.
I guess I should write something here.
Re: North Star BT67 put down on lake
They don't and I'll wager the first thing done was check refueling in YPL and no contamination found.There's no jet fuel in YFH though. So they would have flown there with the contaminated fuel and then have a double flameout on the way back?
Fuel systems are independent and engines are fed from respective main tanks. Fuel is transfered from aux tanks to main tanks as required in flight on longer flights. You can't xfeed from one main tank to another. Engines are xfed by over riding fuel pressure feeding from main tanks through a xfeed valve by boost pump pressure. Want to feed both engines from left main, right boost pumps off and left boost pumps on. Opposite for other engine.
YFH is short flight and only fuel carried in main tanks and about 21/2 hrs range with main tanks. Like any other PT6 the engines will run at low altitude with no boost pumps operating. I doubt both HP pumps failed at the same time.
If there are no crew errors, the only one would be insufficient fuel and I doubt that. Even if they forgot to fuel main tanks would give them enough fuel for 2 trips.
The only system that could cut off fuel would be an electrical fault to the firewall shut off systems. The other possibility would be both engines feathered, like most other PT6 the auto feather system is poor to useless but they stated engines failed so this is unlikely.
Ditching at night, dead stick is likely right up there with worst days. Well done guys. Hopefully for peace of mind I hope the reason why is found.
Black air has no lift - extra fuel has no weight
http://www.blackair.ca
http://www.blackair.ca