NeverBlue wrote:Man...do we ever have a lot of experts out there with absolutley NO EXPERIENCE in ANYTHING!!
of course not I am a student and thats why I'm asking what other people think (yeah I do go a little off into the deep end with my own opinions, being outspoken runs in my family for at least 3 generations)
NeverBlue wrote:
BigBlue...your student fees go to the Student Union whom YOU elected, not BCIT...a process you'll learn about in the "real world" when you grow up.
the student union might not be BCIT proper but its still part of the picture and yes I'm not entirely sure where exactly all the fees go but I do know we get a bum deal compared to Burnaby campus. also the student union does what it can and I respect that...
NeverBlue wrote:
Has anybody ever been to any other aviation training school?? I think not because if you did there would be no contest.
BCIT's fleet is the biggest of any maintenance training school in all of North America idiot!
Do you know how much an airplane costs??
no because otherwise we wouldn't be at BCIT... but I have taken an equivalent program for another field and though the school was relatively under funded compared to BCIT here was a lot less bullshit, FURTHERMORE I can compare BCIT to BCIT its self because the program is broken up and some parts are more refined then others so its obvious when the quality varies from good to bad (yes I love aviation so much that when I found out you had to take a TC approved course to be an AME I went back to school! Maybe I should have done correspondence but then BCIT had such a good image.....)
I have a pretty good idea what most of BCIT's aircraft would cost in real life, I have no clue what the school paid for them but I'm sure it was still quite a lot, I know how much that campus costs, and I also know that the tool we needed to do the projects that were pencil whipped to please the auditors is less expensive then the plasma TVs in the cafeteria. I think the high cost is part of the problem, to get that kind of money the school needs to keep up a certain image and please a lot of people, and they forget about the students. also how does my school's big fleet make me an idiot? just because BCIT has the biggest penis does not make it the best school.
NeverBlue wrote:
First of all...does anybody know that BCIT's Aerospace programs are audited by Transport Canada?... that they are the governing body of the programs? TC tells the schools what requirements they are not meeting...and the schools have no choice but to comply or lose their approval.
yes I did mention TC's expectations and I'm glad they set standards. but standards only mean so much. I've seen projects pencil whipped so that they would go through the audit even though we did not do them because we did not have the proper tools due to a budget freeze (read the part about plasma TVs) what I meant to say was that on top of TC's expectations BCIT has its own way of doing things that have nothing to do with TC or aviation and it complicates the issue.
NeverBlue wrote:
Imagine...a student re-writing Practical Projects...KNOW IT ALL!!...no wonder it didn't get anywhere...like BigBlue he probably couldn't spell the word impossible.
Isn't it always the case...the students want to tell the teachers how and what they should learn. Every college program I've ever taken has been the same.
he did a very fine job and collaborated with the instructor because unlike the person who wrote the original projects he actually touched the engines. this has nothing to do with students telling the teacher what to do at all and I'm sorry if I gave you that impression. the student who re wrote the sheets did so under the direction of our instructor and really all he did was make new sheets that did not include what the instructor had told us to N/A and a few other changes (I call it a complete rewrite there were PAGES OF N/A in level 2)
NeverBlue wrote:
Does anyone know that all Post Secondary Aerospace training is BASIC TRAINING only!!...maybe you should look up the term "BASIC".
your mom.
actually from what i've heard and this is from more then one instructor is that employers find students dont know the basics at all. I am not asking them to tell us how to overhaul a trent engine, infarct the SCOPE of the program is not bad at all, if anything its too broad, I just wish hey would be consistent in what the DO teach us.
NeverBlue wrote:
This industry is a love/hate industry. The problem with most students today is that they want the job with the best money and don't even care if they really like it. ...a millwright...hmmm...challenging.
if that were true in my case I'd be a rig pig.
NeverBlue wrote:
Here's a little secret...the students who left BCIT Aerospace because they thought is was a rip off find a "better" job actually got kicked out of the school and had no choice...tears and all...
actually not only did the instructor give him a "we need guys like you" speech but he was still on the class list in the next level and since we knew his student number we all saw his marks, they were fine.
NeverBlue wrote:
Nice comment jsmetalbashers...post a dig at BCIT and then say "but if you really want to work on airplanes and your (again misspelled) enthusiastic, you'll do fine"
Do you realize that you've just c-o-n-t-r-a-d-i-c-t-e-d yourself?
Why on earth would you take the course if you're not interested in airplanes...Duh...LOL
aviation starts with A and some people are too lazy to go through the whole alphabet when choosing a career (I know people like this who are passing with decent marks and will probably make OK AMEs some day if they stick with it or maybe the interest will sink in?) and then their parents are paying for the program (nothing wrong with that my parents are still helping me) and they don't expect you to fail or drop out so you carry on, finish the program and look for a cushy job in Vancouver. Besides the way BCIT markets the program you'd think it was a great choice. and its not like the course is too hard or something the real concern is who is going to hire us after that? (some bits are tough but others are waaaaaay too easy (GRASBY IF YOU ARE READING THIS I AM TALKING ABOUT LEVEL SEVEN WHAT A JOKE)
NeverBlue wrote:
Emoutal...QA doesn't create the exams...cirriculum developers do...qualified ones...didn't you listen in class? What does QA do? I bet you don't even know...and if you've ever read more than one book you would know that textbook authors don't know everything just because they wrote it down and published it...and yes they could be contradicted at times.
well I know the instructors don't want be be embarrassed by bogus exams so it does not make sense that they are responsible for them, THEY blame QA when ever a question comes up that has problems with it. apparently the process for changing exams involves QA people going over it to make sure it still complies with whatever requirements. Sometimes they even warn us ahead of time or just tell us what answer to put down. And thats nice. Really old exams are not usually a problem because they've been fixed but some of the newer ones are, they seem to take a long time to get fixed because the class before and after me will have the same problem. Currently though I cant complain much about the level 8 exams. And yes I know all about textbooks.. thats why its good to have an instructor who knows what hes talking about. (and really most do) when you get a combination of an instructor who is unfamiliar with the material and a bogus exam sometimes they go with whatever the exam says even though we were were taught something completely different and that is a problem. You cant blame the 30 years on heavy jets guy if one day they tell him he's teaching floats but its a real pain in the ass. and stuff like that happened to my class far too often.
since this is now a pissing err I mean spelling contest: the correct spelling is “curriculum”. Also “absolutely”
"It's was crappy but I guess it was adequate", what the hell is that? How the hell does he know if he's been well educated or not...he's still in school.
I just said it was a guess, I can only hope 5 years from now I will look back and say that it wasnt so bad after all. and any idiot can see when you are being taught conflicting information or pencil whipping a project that TC says you should do.
also to "BITEUINTHEASS" (you a student or an instructor?) I WAS a bit out of line on the security thing, I was referring to an incident where one instructor said something that I wont repeat (not profanity just don't want to get too specific) probably because he was locked out of something and to another where an unknown student used a "projectile" "weapon" (quote: BCIT propaganda leaflet) against a security guard ( the weapon was a kiwi )
I don't expect everyone teaching me to know everything but it would be nice if they knew what was on the exam.
the correct spelling is also "definitely", and this is an Internet forum not an essay contest. but I suppose pedantry is actually a good thing for an AME.
its good to see someone with a better opinion of the school even if they cant say anything positive.
at least neverblue pointed out that we have some nice aircraft to work on.
you know I really expected someone to say they had a good experience as a student at this school.
will someone stand up for BCIT or just talk about how bad I am for expressing my opinion and feelings without without paying much attention to spelling and grammar?
to anyone who thinks this is just random BCIT bashing from a disgruntled student you are either missing the point a little bit or I havent made myself clear. I AM pissed off and I know its going to sound like backpedaling but so be it. I don't really mean to say its a COMPLETE waste of time I just feel there is huge room for improvement and there MIGHT be better options, it saddens me when I hear people talk about how much better PVI was or other schools are like SAIT or northern lights (not just twotter btw). I wouldn't go so far as to call BCIT a “puppy farm” (thats too insulting to me as a student) but its pretty hard to believe that it represents what all aviation schools are like... Around level 6 (helicopters, not too bad a level BTW despite what I was told throughout all the previous levels) I lazily searched a couple of Internet forums and I found MUCH more bad then good and now that I'm graduating I am a bit worried about what people think. Now obviously I've done nothing to promote my own image as a BCIT student but I wanted to hear some more opinions.
also I might not be an EXPERT in the field at all but I do know when I've learned something and when I have not learned anything, its hard to comment on the quality of what I've learned but I can comment on the quality of how well its being taught.
Kettle Blue!