jazz/atr

Discuss topics relating to airlines.

Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako

User avatar
green bastard
Rank 2
Rank 2
Posts: 84
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 6:30 pm

jazz/atr

Post by green bastard »

The word on the street is Jazz getting ATR's.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
dashx
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1227
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 11:51 am

Re: jazz/atr

Post by dashx »

Which street would that be?
---------- ADS -----------
 
sanjet
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 920
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 8:54 am

Re: jazz/atr

Post by sanjet »

I actually heard they are getting antonov 225's.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
CL-Skadoo!
Rank 8
Rank 8
Posts: 819
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 6:41 pm
Location: Intensity in Ten Cities.

Re: jazz/atr

Post by CL-Skadoo! »

I heard they were re-exploring tri-plane design. I feel Sopwith and Fokker will be competitive in this market.
---------- ADS -----------
 
av8tor_assrope
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 439
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 6:34 pm

Re: jazz/atr

Post by av8tor_assrope »

Shuttle……..Jazz Galactic
---------- ADS -----------
 
I want to die like my grandfather did, peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming in terror like his passengers...
Old fella
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2482
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2007 7:04 am
Location: I'm retired. I don't want to'I don't have to and you can't make me.

Re: jazz/atr

Post by Old fella »

dashx wrote:Which street would that be?

George Street - YYT

:smt040
---------- ADS -----------
 
Inverted2
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3882
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 7:46 am

Re: jazz/atr

Post by Inverted2 »

Seriously, I have heard that rumour from a management person, because ATR makes a 50 seater as well as the 78(?) seat one. Bombardier, on the other hand only makes the Q400 now and Jazz will have to start replacing the 100/300 in the future as they are getting a tad old. Some routes jazz has woudn't support a Q400
---------- ADS -----------
 
DEI = Didn’t Earn It
CanadianEh
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 564
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 2:00 pm
Location: YYZ

Re: jazz/atr

Post by CanadianEh »

Inverted2 wrote:Seriously, I have heard that rumour from a management person, because ATR makes a 50 seater as well as the 78(?) seat one. Bombardier, on the other hand only makes the Q400 now and Jazz will have to start replacing the 100/300 in the future as they are getting a tad old. Some routes jazz has woudn't support a Q400
Bombardier also makes the Q200 and Q300, which seats 37-39 and 50-52 passengers respectively. That seems like it would be the best option, but it makes sense that they would be considering ATRs I guess.

Here's a link: http://www.bombardier.com/en/aerospace/ ... t/q-series
---------- ADS -----------
 
DanJ
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 292
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 11:12 pm

Re: jazz/atr

Post by DanJ »

I've heard that only the 400 is in production now, but that the smaller models are available to order. Not sure if that means a minimum order amount to build them, or if a guy calls up and wants a 200 for a corporate shuttle, they would build it.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Valhalla
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 256
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 2:53 pm
Location: Canada

Re: jazz/atr

Post by Valhalla »

CanadianEh wrote:Bombardier also makes the Q200 and Q300, which seats 37-39 and 50-52 passengers respectively. That seems like it would be the best option, but it makes sense that they would be considering ATRs I guess.
Bombardier has decided to abandon Q200/Q300 production to concentrate production efforts on the Q400. The last Q300 rolled off the line a couple of months ago and is currently being modded over at Field Aviation for the Japanese Coast Guard. The Q300/Q200 jigs and other production machinery have been moved away from the factory already, so that's the end of that...

Maybe Jazz should order some new Viking DHC6-400's instead!
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
dashx
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1227
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 11:51 am

Re: jazz/atr

Post by dashx »

Arkia Airlines decided on ATR's over the Dash 8-400 a few years back.

In any case Jazz (at some point much to everyone's chagrin) will get 400's. no wait....

Star Alliance ........ Continental Q400 (YYZ)

Seems to me (humor me it's a stretch of the imagination) like Jazz already has Q400's at their disposal....
---------- ADS -----------
 
teacher
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2450
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 3:25 pm

Re: jazz/atr

Post by teacher »

They are also exploring the rebuild option being offered by Bombardier for the DHC8-100. Other companies are getting in on it and could provide cockpit and cabin upgrades as well. I'm sure if JHazz does go the Q400 route a deal for the Dash 100 rebuilds will be included.
---------- ADS -----------
 
https://eresonatemedia.com/
https://bambaits.ca/
https://youtube.com/channel/UCWit8N8YCJSvSaiSw5EWWeQ
CanadianEh
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 564
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 2:00 pm
Location: YYZ

Re: jazz/atr

Post by CanadianEh »

Valhalla wrote:
CanadianEh wrote:Bombardier also makes the Q200 and Q300, which seats 37-39 and 50-52 passengers respectively. That seems like it would be the best option, but it makes sense that they would be considering ATRs I guess.
Bombardier has decided to abandon Q200/Q300 production to concentrate production efforts on the Q400. The last Q300 rolled off the line a couple of months ago and is currently being modded over at Field Aviation for the Japanese Coast Guard. The Q300/Q200 jigs and other production machinery have been moved away from the factory already, so that's the end of that...

Maybe Jazz should order some new Viking DHC6-400's instead!
That's a shame!
---------- ADS -----------
 
teacher
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2450
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 3:25 pm

Re: jazz/atr

Post by teacher »

The 200 and 300 were old designs and some parts from what I heard would no longer be supported. It made more sense to abandon the type and focus on the Q400. On a more interesting note due to demand for the 300 still being strong I read somewhere that a shortened Q400 was in the works, say a Q350 which would have parts commonality with the 400. Than again Bombardier has been floating the idea of a 90 seat Q500 too so we'll see what happens. My guess is their waiting for someone to commit to orders before proceeding with the projects.
---------- ADS -----------
 
https://eresonatemedia.com/
https://bambaits.ca/
https://youtube.com/channel/UCWit8N8YCJSvSaiSw5EWWeQ
User avatar
flyinggreasemonkey
Rank 6
Rank 6
Posts: 454
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 12:26 pm

Re: jazz/atr

Post by flyinggreasemonkey »

I hear fat people can buy seats with Jazz that have extra space, but the downside is they send your ass for liposuction before the flight.
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
dashx
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1227
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 11:51 am

Re: jazz/atr

Post by dashx »

Hopefully the jigs are enroute to Viking
Let me see now. Most Companies still like the 100/200/300 series Dash 8.....

Giving the jigs to Viking would be like giving them licence to print money.

no?

I know some equipment went to scrap. Exactly what i can't say.
---------- ADS -----------
 
brownbear
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 259
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 11:31 pm
Location: BC

Re: jazz/atr

Post by brownbear »

The ATR 42-500 is a good replacement for the 300 series 8's.

ATR's are a fine product. You can see the airbus in them......

Bombardier screwed it up big time. No C series for AC and no replacement 8's. Not everyone wants to buy 75 seater.

Embraer and ATR will be the king here.....right in Bombardier soil.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Don't be disgruntled....move on!
User avatar
ETOPS
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 218
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 11:26 am
Location: some godforsaken island...

Re: jazz/atr

Post by ETOPS »

I hope they go with Bombardier. Not too keen on hearing about all these layoffs (some 700 a few weeks ago in Montreal, and over 4000 this year).
Plus the 8s are better looking. :wink:
---------- ADS -----------
 
genetic jack hammer
Rank 7
Rank 7
Posts: 503
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 4:50 pm
Location: right here

Re: jazz/atr

Post by genetic jack hammer »

Mayday on the Discovery channel just ran the American Eagle ATR episode (ice build up). Perhaps, the Q400's would be better choice.
---------- ADS -----------
 
yycflyguy
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2784
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 9:18 am

Re: jazz/atr

Post by yycflyguy »

You didn't stay up late to see that the ATR 72 had its de-ice boot redesigned and they now forbid the use of flap in known icing conditions. There has not been an accident since. The Q400 just recently has had problems with gear collapse and some companies were trying to get rid of their entire fleet of Q400s (SAS).
---------- ADS -----------
 
Inverted2
Rank 11
Rank 11
Posts: 3882
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 7:46 am

Re: jazz/atr

Post by Inverted2 »

Lets forget about them props! Once Calin realizes that AC is the only mainline in North America to operate Embrarer jets and that they are losing money operating them with the current AC costs, we'll get those instead! :lol:
---------- ADS -----------
 
DEI = Didn’t Earn It
desksgo
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2850
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 12:05 pm
Location: Toy Poodle Town, Manitoba
Contact:

Re: jazz/atr

Post by desksgo »

genetic jack hammer wrote:Mayday on the Discovery channel just ran the American Eagle ATR episode (ice build up). Perhaps, the Q400's would be better choice.
That's how most companies do their aircraft feasibility reports; by watching Mayday.

"We're dropping our entire fleet of Boeing products, because, this one time, in Hawaii, this, this, airplane, that was made by boeing, had the roof rip off, and that was bad, and people died and got hurt and stuff, so that's why boeing isn't a good airplane. Can I have a cookie?"
---------- ADS -----------
 
User avatar
Localizer
Rank (9)
Rank (9)
Posts: 1451
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 9:18 pm
Location: CYYZ

Re: jazz/atr

Post by Localizer »

yycflyguy ...
The Q400 just recently has had problems with gear collapse and some companies were trying to get rid of their entire fleet of Q400s (SAS).
Your just as bad as CNN to put your own spin on things ... "some companies" ... SAS the only company to get rid of them, mind you because of their own crappy maintenance practices. And everyone else was jumping in line to get there hands on them. The Q400 is an amazing machine and if Jazz/AC were smart .. (hack, hack!) .. they'd stay away from the ATR's. Not that the ATR is complete junk .. it just doesn't come close to the Q400.
---------- ADS -----------
 
yycflyguy
Rank 10
Rank 10
Posts: 2784
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 9:18 am

Re: jazz/atr

Post by yycflyguy »

Weird, that wasn't any spin, just the facts. Point is, there isn't a single aircraft type out there that doesn't have some sort of dirty laundry.

Good luck with either the ATR or the Q400... either one would be an improvement over the current fleet.

Lets forget about them props! Once Calin realizes that AC is the only mainline in North America to operate Embrarer jets and that they are losing money operating them with the current AC costs, we'll get those instead!
Actually AC is pretty happy with the 190s. They are an improvement over the RJ for efficiency and passenger comfort and they are very competitive on routes that can't support 120+ pax that they have in direct competition with WJ routes. I don't have any of the CASM or RASM numbers but I don't hear any complaints other than the 15 175s should have been 190s. Pretty hard not to make money off that plane when you are only paying for a pilot and a half.
---------- ADS -----------
 
Valhalla
Rank 4
Rank 4
Posts: 256
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2004 2:53 pm
Location: Canada

Re: jazz/atr

Post by Valhalla »

yycflyguy wrote:The Q400 just recently has had problems with gear collapse and some companies were trying to get rid of their entire fleet of Q400s (SAS).
Actually, after SAS sold their Q400s, SAS last year ordered 14 new Q400's plus options... But to save face, they will be operated by Estonian Air, Norway's Wideroe's Flyveselskap A/S and Latvia's airBaltic (all owned by SAS).

Can you name anybody else who are getting rid of Q400s?
---------- ADS -----------
 
Post Reply

Return to “General Airline Industry Comments”