The OP is a troll and unmitigated asshat. Don't bite.
The Wrights and their impossible 1904 flights, 105 in total.
Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, I WAS Birddog
- RedAndWhiteBaron
- Rank 8
- Posts: 813
- Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2020 5:55 pm
- Location: In the left seat, admitting my mistakes
Re: The Wrights and their impossible 1904 flights, 105 in total.
I will dance the sky on laughter-silvered wings.
- RedAndWhiteBaron
- Rank 8
- Posts: 813
- Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2020 5:55 pm
- Location: In the left seat, admitting my mistakes
Re: The Wrights and their impossible 1904 flights, 105 in total.
*RedAndWhiteBaron runs into the thread, does a naked chicken dance while waving his arms and making silly pointy gun gestures with his fingers, and runs away.
I will dance the sky on laughter-silvered wings.
Re: The Wrights and their impossible 1904 flights, 105 in total.
The Wright brothers did not even finish the 1903 plane at Kitty Hawk, NC. Flyer 1 never flew as can be seen in the following 1904 article:
1904-05-30, “A gentlemen visiting this city whose home is in Kitty Hawk”, The Gazette-Messenger, Washington, North Carolina, May 30, 1904, col. 2, p. 2.
That man who worked for Orville and Wilbur said explicitly the 1903 plane was still unfinished as of May 1904. How can I believe the Wrights flew in North Carolina if the independent evidence is against them?!
How can I believe the two brothers performed 105 flights, or even a single one, in 1904 when the September 20, 1904, article in Dayton Daily News (already quoted in full a few posts above) says, citing one of the brothers, that they were in process of perfecting their machine after a few attempts at flight (not even flights).
Unfortunately, the evidence i have is that nobody on this forum opened the book I quoted in my first post so you do not know what is written there. I can not copy and paste here 100 pages of letters, articles and other documents.
1904-05-30, “A gentlemen visiting this city whose home is in Kitty Hawk”, The Gazette-Messenger, Washington, North Carolina, May 30, 1904, col. 2, p. 2.
That man who worked for Orville and Wilbur said explicitly the 1903 plane was still unfinished as of May 1904. How can I believe the Wrights flew in North Carolina if the independent evidence is against them?!
How can I believe the two brothers performed 105 flights, or even a single one, in 1904 when the September 20, 1904, article in Dayton Daily News (already quoted in full a few posts above) says, citing one of the brothers, that they were in process of perfecting their machine after a few attempts at flight (not even flights).
Unfortunately, the evidence i have is that nobody on this forum opened the book I quoted in my first post so you do not know what is written there. I can not copy and paste here 100 pages of letters, articles and other documents.
- Attachments
-
- 1904-05-30, “A gentlemen visiting this city whose home is in Kitty Hawk”, The Gazette-Messenger, Washington, North Carolina, May 30, 1904, col. 2, p. 2.
- 1904-05-30 The 1903 Flyer I was not finished.jpg (34.2 KiB) Viewed 785 times
-
- Rank 5
- Posts: 311
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2016 3:31 pm
Re: The Wrights and their impossible 1904 flights, 105 in total.
RedAndWhiteBaron wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 8:32 pmThe OP is a troll and unmitigated asshat. Don't bite.
RedAndWhiteBaron wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 12:56 am * continues his naked chicken dance
Fúck off, and fúck you.
It’s unfortunate that the OP should get attacked by obscenities for expressing his/her thoughts in a public forum.
If someone posts something that you do not agree with, and which you do not feel is appropriate to be talked about in a public forum ... don’t partake in the discussion.
Why not try the following:
. Flag the post, and let the moderators decide if the subject suits the forum
. Avoid using obscenities and calling the poster names
. Express your rebuttal in a professional manner
. Do Not Bully.
.
Challener’s Rules of Engagement:
Challenger shall not engage those who lack common sense, Intelligence OR those who bring forward id*otic assertions
Challenger shall not engage those who lack common sense, Intelligence OR those who bring forward id*otic assertions
- Petit-Lion
- Rank 0
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 4:13 pm
- Location: Montréal
Re: The Wrights and their impossible 1904 flights, 105 in total.
... or the OP may be some kind of sociologist doing either an experiment or a practical joke at our expense...
Just store this thread between the chemtrails and the flat earth theory.
Just store this thread between the chemtrails and the flat earth theory.
- RedAndWhiteBaron
- Rank 8
- Posts: 813
- Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2020 5:55 pm
- Location: In the left seat, admitting my mistakes
Re: The Wrights and their impossible 1904 flights, 105 in total.
I would like to apologize for my behaviour in this thread.
While I do believe the OP is a troll, my responses were uncalled for, inappropriately vulgar, and inexcusable. I have received a mod warning, and rightfully so. I will not attempt to justify why I behaved the way I did, and only reiterate that my behaviour was unacceptable, and that I understand that.
Should I ever behave in such a manner in the future, it is my hope that I will again be called out for it.
While I do believe the OP is a troll, my responses were uncalled for, inappropriately vulgar, and inexcusable. I have received a mod warning, and rightfully so. I will not attempt to justify why I behaved the way I did, and only reiterate that my behaviour was unacceptable, and that I understand that.
Should I ever behave in such a manner in the future, it is my hope that I will again be called out for it.
I will dance the sky on laughter-silvered wings.
-
- Rank 5
- Posts: 311
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2016 3:31 pm
Re: The Wrights and their impossible 1904 flights, 105 in total.
.RedAndWhiteBaron wrote: ↑Sat Apr 10, 2021 10:15 pm I would like to apologize for my behaviour in this thread.
Your apology demonstrates that you have a strong character PLUS a good set of values.
Kudos to you.
.
Challener’s Rules of Engagement:
Challenger shall not engage those who lack common sense, Intelligence OR those who bring forward id*otic assertions
Challenger shall not engage those who lack common sense, Intelligence OR those who bring forward id*otic assertions