Adverse Reactions Poll

[Sulako]

Yes we get tonnes of government spies posting on AvCanada, I did an ip check

Did you know death due to unknown causes is the highest cause of death in Alberta?

More trash that's not true. You're quoting an article from 2022, referencing stats from 2021 as if it's relevant now.

https://calgary.ctvnews.ca/deaths-with- ... -1.5975536

From the same article, which explains the rise. Wanna guess what it actually was?

"We have this impression of surviving COVID and that’s the end of it, and that’s not necessarily true," he told CTV News.

Gregson points to a large study out of the U.S. that found people who had COVID-19 are at a higher risk of heart disease, stroke, pulmonary embolisms and death compared to those who haven’t been infected. The risk is even higher for those who end up in hospital or the ICU with COVID.

"We do expect that there will be deaths that aren’t directly related to COVID, but indirectly related to COVID to occur after the diagnosis in patients after the first month of infection," he said.

"One would expect that some of those patients are going to survive the COVID and then die at home from other complications."

Unknown causes had never made the list in Alberta before 2019. Weird. 'Unknown causes' peaked and subsided substantially in 2021. By 2022 Dementia retook the #1 spot, with unknown causes relegated to #4.

[Bingo Fuel]

Okay, so once again, 99.97% survival is "just a cold", and totally acceptable to Jerry.

99.97% is approximately 1 in 900.

But 1 in 400 is unacceptable.

Here's the point I'm trying to get at:

The people who died from COVID, Jerry doesn't think those lives mattered.

The young people and athletes who supposedly died from the vaccine matter. But the COVID victims don't.

Therefore Jerry cherry picks the lives that matter to him.

As a reminder, the actual chances of dying from the vaccine is 1 in 1.296 million.

Do you remember that many of the deaths of "covid" was actually malpractice? The known incorrect protocol was applied. In addition to not differentiating between with covid and of covid.

We've been over this before. Are you TRYING to be dense or does it just come naturally? Geepers.

Just like how you aren't differentiating dying of the vaccine and with the vaccine.

I wasn't using the government's COVID survival numbers, I was using yours. You repeated that statistic multiple times.

I only ask you treat vaccine deaths the same way you did for COVID deaths.

[Aviatard]

You're being intentionally obtuse in reading that memo as some sort of a "stone tablet" moment, that justifies all your quackery around anti-vaxxing and denying the pandemic.

The guidance listed is that healthcare facilities will no longer be using rapid tests as a guide for patient treatment. Take a nasal swab of suspected COVID or respiratory illness positive patients, and have it lab tested... is the current guidance. Wow, what an earth shattering revelation that is, that a hospital lab result is more accurate than a half-assed rapid test swab job that most people weren't doing correctly to begin with - oh, and from the BCCDC guidance are only accurate in showing infection between 3-7 days after being infected. So, useless in a healthcare setting in guiding treatment...

Again, I'm failing to see your assertion that "...testing kits are erroneous [sic] causing too many false positives. They have been discontinued." As a matter of fact the reporting is quite clear that rapid tests as a diagnostic tool are useful in a non-hospital setting, but when more accurate and sensitive tests are available (such as in a hospital setting) there is guidance to use the more accurate test. All that notwithstanding the clear issues around the efficacy of BTNX (green box) rapid tests.

So, JerryRig posts PROOF that turns out to be bullshit with a 10 second reading of his "EVIDENCE?"

Shocker.

[cdnavater]

81 people know 6 people who died related to the injections.

Your poll is useless because before you modified it, I was one of the dead!
It is proof that you are as gullible as we all think, that’s it!

[JerryRig]

lol ok guys. Bash away. I’m gonna look for y’all in the obituaries, because….karma.

[JustaCanadian]

lol ok guys. Bash away. I’m gonna look for y’all in the obituaries, because….karma.

Why not be happy today that people have the choice? They can take the vaccine if they want it. They don’t have to take it if they don’t want it. And there are no barriers since the government is willing to spend your money to give it to whoever wants it.

But by your logic, the government won’t spend to much money on it because these people will be dead. So by the time they come back for a next booster they will be gone with all that karma you speak of.

Seems like a win for everyone. We meet all the social pillars and are on track to ultimately save the fiscal conservatives money in the long run so even they can stop their bitching.

[TG]

81 people know 6 people who died related to the injections.

Your poll is useless because before you modified it, I was one of the dead!
It is proof that you are as gullible as we all think, that’s it!

Lol, I did the same and voted dead as according to Jerry those who received some vaccination should be dead.

[Aviatard]

81 people know 6 people who died related to the injections.

Your poll is useless because before you modified it, I was one of the dead!
It is proof that you are as gullible as we all think, that’s it!

Lol, I did the same and voted dead as according to Jerry those who received some vaccination should be dead.

Are you saying that a totally scientific poll, which is relied on and quoted by JerryRig as proof of his predictions, can be manipulated and contain false and unvetted data? That due to the poll's open and accessible design and its allowance of unverified reports, incomplete poll data is often used in false claims regarding vaccine safety? Can it be that raw data from polls is not enough to determine whether a vaccine can cause a particular adverse event?

[JerryRig]

Your poll is useless because before you modified it, I was one of the dead!
It is proof that you are as gullible as we all think, that’s it!

Lol, I did the same and voted dead as according to Jerry those who received some vaccination should be dead.

Are you saying that a totally scientific poll, which is relied on and quoted by JerryRig as proof of his predictions, can be manipulated and contain false and unvetted data? That due to the poll's open and accessible design and its allowance of unverified reports, incomplete poll data is often used in false claims regarding vaccine safety? Can it be that raw data from polls is not enough to determine whether a vaccine can cause a particular adverse event?

I’ve already stated this isn’t scientific only an indicator. Good to see you are on the ball.

[Aviatard]

Lol, I did the same and voted dead as according to Jerry those who received some vaccination should be dead.

Are you saying that a totally scientific poll, which is relied on and quoted by JerryRig as proof of his predictions, can be manipulated and contain false and unvetted data? That due to the poll's open and accessible design and its allowance of unverified reports, incomplete poll data is often used in false claims regarding vaccine safety? Can it be that raw data from polls is not enough to determine whether a vaccine can cause a particular adverse event?

I’ve already stated this isn’t scientific only an indicator. Good to see you are on the ball.

Oh really?

And look again at the poll results. The evidence is indisputable.

[JerryRig]

IMG_7137.jpeg (393.28 KiB) Viewed 3439 times

[‘Bob’]

Ironic

[JerryRig]

Ironic

Point of view

[JerryRig]

Fortunately their plan isn’t working. Glad most of you made it to the other side.

https://rumble.com/v41smwz-all-by-design..html

[kgb531]

Your poll is useless because before you modified it, I was one of the dead!
It is proof that you are as gullible as we all think, that’s it!

Lol, I did the same and voted dead as according to Jerry those who received some vaccination should be dead.

Are you saying that a totally scientific poll, which is relied on and quoted by JerryRig as proof of his predictions, can be manipulated and contain false and unvetted data? That due to the poll's open and accessible design and its allowance of unverified reports, incomplete poll data is often used in false claims regarding vaccine safety? Can it be that raw data from polls is not enough to determine whether a vaccine can cause a particular adverse event?

Just for clarification, are you talking about VAERS or Jerry's poll? The parameters are identical.