Midair at DCA
Moderators: lilfssister, North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako
Re: Midair at DCA
I have experienced the white screen issue as well. In my case, it was caused by a conflicting mod that affected the G3000 displays. Removing that mod fixed the problem and the screens returned to normal.white screenI suggest checking any recent mods you’ve installed, especially those related to the G3000 or flight dynamics, and disabling them one by one to identify the cause.
Last edited by encoread on Sun May 18, 2025 8:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Rank 1
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2019 12:46 pm
Re: Midair at DCA
There are no required minimums -- it means don't trade paint.digits_ wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 10:02 pmWhat's the minimum required distance if an aircraft says they'll maintain visual separation? And if there is such a minimum distance and it's getting busted, is ATC not supposed to intervene in class B airspace?atc_is_god wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 9:21 pm Nothing wrong with ATC‘s actions and execution here, from one who knows.
Routing en route aircraft at glideslope height within the last mile of approach to a runway is an insane airspace structure approach though.
-
- Rank 4
- Posts: 254
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2023 5:15 pm
- Location: Upper Rubber Boot Airways
Re: Midair at DCA
The NTSB is now reporting the helicopter pilot was flying 80-100 feet above their maximum altitude of 200 feet.
https://globalnews.ca/news/11311447/dc- ... -altitude/
https://globalnews.ca/news/11311447/dc- ... -altitude/
Safety starts with two
Re: Midair at DCA
To clarify: it sounds like they were flying at the correct altitude as per their altimeter, but the altimeter was 80-100ft out due to errors in the altimeter and/or the altimeter setting was wrong.itsgrosswhatinet wrote: ↑Wed Jul 30, 2025 1:36 pm The NTSB is now reporting the helicopter pilot was flying 80-100 feet above their maximum altitude of 200 feet.
https://globalnews.ca/news/11311447/dc- ... -altitude/
Re: Midair at DCA
The helicopter being above above max altitude is such a red herring.
If the difference between 200 and 300 feet is death, it was never a viable helicopter route.
If the difference between 200 and 300 feet is death, it was never a viable helicopter route.
Re: Midair at DCA
And they didn’t take evasive action when told to by ATC
Welcome to Redneck Airlines. We might not get you there but we'll get you close!
- Daniel Cooper
- Rank 6
- Posts: 444
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2018 6:38 am
- Location: Unknown
Re: Midair at DCA
It's not a cruising altitude of 200'. It's a hard cap altitude.
Re: Midair at DCA
Also they did quite a few things wrong, like going past the turnign point, not seeing the traffic, transponder turned off, etc. If they had just been 100ft high, they wouldn't have had this accident.Daniel Cooper wrote: ↑Wed Jul 30, 2025 7:16 pmIt's not a cruising altitude of 200'. It's a hard cap altitude.
Re: Midair at DCA
THIS!!
As an AvCanada discussion grows longer:
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
-the probability of 'entitlement' being mentioned, approaches 1
-one will be accused of using bad airmanship
Re: Midair at DCA
I get that, but 100 feet is not separation. There needs to be a buffer, like there is everywhere else in the system. Altimeters have errors, pilots make errors, and 100 feet is not a very big one. Normal IFR-VFR separation is 500 feet, or 1,000 feet if it's a medium overflying a light. Even cruising altitudes give you 500 feet of separation from other traffic, so two pilots or their aircraft can be off by 200 feet each and you still won't hit. And that's in random airspace where you're less likely to meet someone than short final at DCA. Furthermore, a visual approach has no lower limit, so the RJ could have been even lower.Daniel Cooper wrote: ↑Wed Jul 30, 2025 7:16 pmIt's not a cruising altitude of 200'. It's a hard cap altitude.
If there's no altitude separation other than "maybe" 100 feet, you might as well not have a hard cap because it can give a false sense of security that if you're at 200 feet, you're safe. But in reality that cap can put you 50-100 feet below an airliner that's almost in the flare, and that's ignoring wake turbulence concerns. The real separation here was supposed to be visual, not merely staying within the confines of a route that provides no built in separation. The helicopter is supposed to see the aircraft and pass behind; unfortunately it seems like they saw the wrong airplane.
- Daniel Cooper
- Rank 6
- Posts: 444
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2018 6:38 am
- Location: Unknown
Re: Midair at DCA
I would never feel "safe" being at a hard cap altitude.