RNP "Short Gate"
Moderators: North Shore, sky's the limit, sepia, Sulako, lilfssister, I WAS Birddog
- twinpratts
- Rank (9)
- Posts: 1620
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 5:38 am
- Location: The Wild Wild West.
- Contact:
Re: RNP "Short Gate"
Until it gets offered without asking, I'm going to request it.
I want to die like my grandfather did, peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming in terror like his passengers...
-
- Rank 8
- Posts: 832
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 10:42 pm
Re: RNP "Short Gate"
YHZ was offering to me a bunch of times before I even had the chance to ask... was very nice.
Re: RNP "Short Gate"
+1twinpratts wrote:Until it gets offered without asking, I'm going to request it.
Re: RNP "Short Gate"
I wasn't sure what this RNP was exactly till I was downwind in YWG all the way to Fargo While WestJet came in on their fancy RNP!
What gives! 45 on the nose I was on final for 7 minutes! My last 6 minutes of the day from YAV to YWG turned into 16...thanks.
sorry for the banter.
What gives! 45 on the nose I was on final for 7 minutes! My last 6 minutes of the day from YAV to YWG turned into 16...thanks.
sorry for the banter.
-
- Rank 7
- Posts: 703
- Joined: Sun Feb 29, 2004 7:16 pm
Re: RNP "Short Gate"
first come first serve...you probably would have waited longer if we did our own visual or Standard IFR approach. RNP saves time and gas.
-
- Rank 5
- Posts: 319
- Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 12:31 am
Re: RNP "Short Gate"
...and with both the FAA and Nav Canada NextGen Equipage Policy embracing a "BEST EQUIPPED, BEST SERVED" priority policy rather than the traditional "FIRST COME FIRST SERVE", there's going to be a lot more squawking from the not-so-well equipped.Flightlevels wrote:first come first serve...you probably would have waited longer if we did our own visual or Standard IFR approach. RNP saves time and gas.
-
- Rank 8
- Posts: 832
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 10:42 pm
Re: RNP "Short Gate"
I'm sorry, but was there a 'for those who pay their bills' category? 

-
- Rank 7
- Posts: 703
- Joined: Sun Feb 29, 2004 7:16 pm
Re: RNP "Short Gate"
Might as well get used to the rnp stuff boys cause the EMB's at ac are getting it next. They were out to yyc having a look at it a few weeks back.
Re: RNP "Short Gate"
EMB's are getting the RNP? That's awesome!! Savings for AC, good for the environment, gives ATC more tools to move A/C, and from what I understand, WJA makes a bit of $$$ off the usage of the approaches from other companies!! Win x 4 !!
-
- Rank 4
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2008 8:13 am
Re: RNP "Short Gate"
"...gives ATC more tools to move A/C"
Does that mean we can halt construction of the new runway in YC? What a mess that's going to be.
Does that mean we can halt construction of the new runway in YC? What a mess that's going to be.
-
- Rank 4
- Posts: 281
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 1:46 pm
Re: RNP "Short Gate"
I don't think the construction of a new runway is going to affect the operation into YYC much, it'll only make things better once its done!stickontheice wrote:"...gives ATC more tools to move A/C"
Does that mean we can halt construction of the new runway in YC? What a mess that's going to be.
Re: RNP "Short Gate"
Sure, it gives ATC more tools to move a/c but it doesn't allow for more airplane movements.... They're already being moved as close together as the arrival system allows (in YYC, anyways). IMO, the RNPs are nice 'cause they're a predictable path to final, unlike my vectors which sometimes result in drastic speed adjustmentsstickontheice wrote:"...gives ATC more tools to move A/C"
Does that mean we can halt construction of the new runway in YC? What a mess that's going to be.

Turn right/left heading XXX, vectors for the hell of it.
Re: RNP "Short Gate"
55+ wrote:WJ approved to .1RNP or still at .3RNP
"huh?" and "wha?"

Turn right/left heading XXX, vectors for the hell of it.
Re: RNP "Short Gate"
.3 or .1 just refers to increased sensitivity and in some case a .1 = lower mins. Think of it as an RNP value of .3 as a LOC only approach, and a .1 as an ILS (for mins as both give lateral and vertical guidance).
The feet you step on today might be attached to the ass you're kissing tomorrow.
Chase lifestyle not metal.
Chase lifestyle not metal.
Re: RNP "Short Gate"
Sorta figured that but thanks for the clarification anyways.KAG wrote:.3 or .1 just refers to increased sensitivity and in some case a .1 = lower mins. Think of it as an RNP value of .3 as a LOC only approach, and a .1 as an ILS (for mins as both give lateral and vertical guidance).
Turn right/left heading XXX, vectors for the hell of it.
Re: RNP "Short Gate"
about new runway in YYC- what a joke! Its only the odd time I've waited 15 mins for a runway in CYYC. Normally it looks like (from the pilots seat) the time wasted could be reduded by efficiencies gained in ATC procedures. CYYC seems to have some manpower issues, and the new runway will not fix that.
Regarding the future of NAV and RNP-
http://eponline.com/articles/2010/04/26 ... n-ceo.aspx
quote "The International Civil Aviation Organization has predicted that efficiencies made possible by just RNP can cut global CO2 emission by 13 million metric tons per year"
"And in Canada, we designed and currently maintain a network of RNP arrival procedures for WestJet that is saving fuel, cutting emissions, reducing track miles and time enroute. Here in the United States, we are helping Southwest Airlines equip its fleet, train its pilots and make operational changes that will enable them to fly RNP paths," Bolsinger explained
Regarding the future of NAV and RNP-
http://eponline.com/articles/2010/04/26 ... n-ceo.aspx
quote "The International Civil Aviation Organization has predicted that efficiencies made possible by just RNP can cut global CO2 emission by 13 million metric tons per year"
"And in Canada, we designed and currently maintain a network of RNP arrival procedures for WestJet that is saving fuel, cutting emissions, reducing track miles and time enroute. Here in the United States, we are helping Southwest Airlines equip its fleet, train its pilots and make operational changes that will enable them to fly RNP paths," Bolsinger explained
Re: RNP "Short Gate"
Glad to see someone views YYC thru rose colored glasses.fundi wrote:about new runway in YYC- what a joke! Its only the odd time I've waited 15 mins for a runway in CYYC. Normally it looks like (from the pilots seat) the time wasted could be reduded by efficiencies gained in ATC procedures. CYYC seems to have some manpower issues, and the new runway will not fix that.

Turn right/left heading XXX, vectors for the hell of it.
Re: RNP "Short Gate"
"Now, if one were to 'uncross' those two big bits of pavement and place them in a parallel config"...
seriously! So when the wind blows 25kts outta the NW and its "only RW28"....how is that fancy 200 million drag strip gonna help. Last week, we requested RW34 as the crosswind was acceptable, but ATC turned us down. wtf?
Why can US atc have more movements on cross runways? See LGA, SFO, Midway, etc. Even YVR uses RW12 well to allieviate the congestion on the 08's! I believe we have an ATC procedural/ job protectionism/ staff shortage issues in YYC.
But thats just my 2cents worth...thats right, it ain't worth much!!
seriously! So when the wind blows 25kts outta the NW and its "only RW28"....how is that fancy 200 million drag strip gonna help. Last week, we requested RW34 as the crosswind was acceptable, but ATC turned us down. wtf?
Why can US atc have more movements on cross runways? See LGA, SFO, Midway, etc. Even YVR uses RW12 well to allieviate the congestion on the 08's! I believe we have an ATC procedural/ job protectionism/ staff shortage issues in YYC.
But thats just my 2cents worth...thats right, it ain't worth much!!
Re: RNP "Short Gate"
<sigh> I grow fatigued. What else is there to say? You've truly got the whole picture. You summed it up perfectly. Perhaps you should assume the roles of YYC twr manager and CEO Calgary Airport Authority because the incumbents running the show clearly have no idea what they're doing. Let me get straight to my point. With comments like these, you appear to be trolling.
Turn right/left heading XXX, vectors for the hell of it.
-
- Rank 3
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 10:45 pm
Re: RNP "Short Gate"
It's unfortunate when some people have so little humility and believe they know how to do a bunch of peoples jobs better than those that actually do the job everyday. It gives us pilots a bad name, although those personalities exist in all professions.
Probably the same type who would be outraged when someone who knows nothing about flying airplanes dare second guess his decision making.
Fundi is probably much wiser and more balanced than he came across in that post though, but it is just easier to point out how great things are in the US compared to here, even though there are a bunch of differences. I will say that EWR and PHL, as examples, can be gong shows to operate out of. If those are examples of how things could be done, then no thanks.
Probably the same type who would be outraged when someone who knows nothing about flying airplanes dare second guess his decision making.
Fundi is probably much wiser and more balanced than he came across in that post though, but it is just easier to point out how great things are in the US compared to here, even though there are a bunch of differences. I will say that EWR and PHL, as examples, can be gong shows to operate out of. If those are examples of how things could be done, then no thanks.
Re: RNP "Short Gate"
Ryan Coke2 wrote:It's unfortunate when some people have so little humility and believe they know how to do a bunch of peoples jobs better than those that actually do the job everyday. It gives us pilots a bad name, although those personalities exist in all professions.
Probably the same type who would be outraged when someone who knows nothing about flying airplanes dare second guess his decision making.
Fundi is probably much wiser and more balanced than he came across in that post though, but it is just easier to point out how great things are in the US compared to here, even though there are a bunch of differences. I will say that EWR and PHL, as examples, can be gong shows to operate out of. If those are examples of how things could be done, then no thanks.
I agree, everyone thinks they can do every else's job better. I for one think the guys in YYC & YEG are great and do their best to move us around. Doesn't bother me to spin once at EPLUR and get another .2 in the log book.

-
- Rank 6
- Posts: 469
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 3:14 pm
Re: RNP "Short Gate"
Isn't it funny... when YYC is swinging arrivals and departures left right and centre, like clockwork, you never hear a peep from this community about a "job well done!"... You hold one pilot up because of a "big picture" situation and it's a disaster.
Realestate is at a premium sometimes... 20 nm final 28 at 160KIAS and a 50 knot headwind. Elements can throw a curveball into the efficient machine an airport is in a perfect world! I admire ATC in YYC sometimes when they do the Intersecting Runway ops with everything perfectly spaced. Good job!!!
Shortgate RNP is a bonus when it works.
One Q about the new runway... how are the taxi times for departure off of the new 34 going to be. The same as the old one, or is the new runway going to be offset to the north compared to the old???
Realestate is at a premium sometimes... 20 nm final 28 at 160KIAS and a 50 knot headwind. Elements can throw a curveball into the efficient machine an airport is in a perfect world! I admire ATC in YYC sometimes when they do the Intersecting Runway ops with everything perfectly spaced. Good job!!!
Shortgate RNP is a bonus when it works.
One Q about the new runway... how are the taxi times for departure off of the new 34 going to be. The same as the old one, or is the new runway going to be offset to the north compared to the old???
Re: RNP "Short Gate"
From the terminal it'll be a lot quicker. Landing on 28 you'll fly right over or little south of the threshold for 34R. The new runway is offset to the north of what will be 34L/16R. Taxiways will be crossing just north of the AC hanger, lined up with route 1A.Flying Nutcracker wrote: One Q about the new runway... how are the taxi times for departure off of the new 34 going to be. The same as the old one, or is the new runway going to be offset to the north compared to the old???